- Joined
- Aug 17, 2005
- Messages
- 20,915
- Reaction score
- 546
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Parties trading blame on bin Laden
Debate rages over why terror chief wasn't stopped
By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff | September 26, 2006
WASHINGTON -- President Bill Clinton's angry defense of his administration's efforts to eliminate Osama bin Laden has set off a new round of charges about whether Democrats or Republicans are to blame for allowing the Al Qaeda leader to remain a national security threat for more than a decade.
``The Bush administration was absolutely negligent for not paying attention in their first eight months in office," said Michael Scheuer, who headed the CIA's bin Laden task force from 1995 to 1999 and retired from the agency as a senior Al Qaeda specialist in 2004. ``But fair is fair. Clinton had 10 chances and Bush had none."
In an interview with ``Fox News Sunday" reporter Chris Wallace, Clinton grew visibly irate when asked whether he'd done enough to stop bin Laden. Clinton leaned forward in his chair, jabbed his finger at Wallace, and said he'd done all he could to eliminate the Al Qaeda leader.
``I worked hard to try and kill him," Clinton told Wallace. The former president then demanded to know why the Bush administration hasn't faced such criticism for letting bin Laden get away, declaring, ``I got closer to killing him than anybody has gotten since."
Indeed, the only time US forces apparently knew bin Laden's location while Bush has held office was in December 2001, during a pitched battle in the Tora Bora mountains of Afghanistan. Experts and analysts thought the military had bin Laden cornered, but he escaped.
Scheuer recalled numerous occasions in the late 1990s when the United States knew bin Laden's whereabouts and travel routine; the terrorist leader had a higher profile before going underground after the 2001 attacks. However, Scheuer said, Clinton and his top aides -- such as national security adviser Samuel Berger and counterterrorism adviser Richard Clarke -- didn't act.
``In May of 1998 and 1999, we had two opportunities to capture him and eight different opportunities to kill him," Scheuer told the Globe yesterday. ``On every one of those occasions, the president or Berger and Clarke turned down the opportunity" to strike.
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/09/26/parties_trading_blame_on_bin_laden/
There you have it folks Michael Scheuer former head of the CIA's bin-Laden unit has just made the statement that we all already knew Clinton had bin-Laden not once, not twice, but 10 times, and he did nothing.