To comment on "why" you said what you did is missing the point. The moderator was telling you that, reasons aside, your continual attacks on other posters is unnecessary.Sorry but when I read someone calling for the mass murder of 75 million people suggesting that their screen name is apt seems appropriate.
It was more a play on the poster's name than anything else spurred on by the call for genocide something that I cannot accept nor remain silent about under any circumstances.
Is there anything more despicable than someone putting themselves on the same level as a Saddam Hussein because the post that I replied to was written as if Saddam himself were speaking from the grave.
But sorry nonetheless.
Wrong, again...The mod was referring to a specific post that I wrote in this thread in reply to Cold Dirt's post that called for the nuclear destruction of Iraq and I commented that his screen name was eerily appropriate for the types of things he was writing.To comment on "why" you said what you did is missing the point. The moderator was telling you that, reasons aside, your continual attacks on other posters is unnecessary.
| Moderator's Warning: |
Wrong, again...The mod was referring to a specific post that I wrote in this thread in reply to Cold Dirt's post that called for the nuclear destruction of Iraq and I commented that his screen name was eerily appropriate for the types of things he was writing.
You're reply to this has nothing at all to do with the topic of this thread which is your modus operandi most of the time you post IMHO....
The assertion, that cascade-centrifuge systems are only there to produce weapons-grade fissile material is simply wrong. There are cascade-centrifuge systems for civil purposes running at this time. An example is the German enrichment facility in Gronau, which runs a cascade-centrifuge system and it supplies material for nuclear power plants, but it does not supply weapons-grade fissile material.I am a physicist and I thoroughly understand the nuclear fuel cycle. A cascade of one thousand centrifuges can process enough spent uranium byproduct material to yield enough HEU for one nuclear device per year. A typical centrifuge-cascade arcade for producing HEU (Pakistan, N.Korea et. al.) consists of between 3000 and 5000 units.
You must understand something Pete. A nuclear cascade-centrifuge system has one purpose and one purpose only... to produce weapons-grade fissile material. No one invests the time, the money, and the technical and material resources to construct a delicate cascade and then stop in mid-process. To do this would actually destroy the cascade because of the corrosive nature of process-byproducts always present in the system. These corrosive byproducts must be constantly evacuated to avoid a cascade-meltdown.
I meant to write Iran not Iraq...a mental typo since we all type Iraq so quickly.As usual you are clueless....first I was talking about Iran...learn to read....second, I said I hoped they tried to attack Israel first so israel could level the country full of terrorist.........
Funny how you libs are quick to come running to the defense of the very people acrossing the border to kill US troops.....did it in Vietnam and now doing it in Iraq......
You call yourself an American.....sorry excuse of one if you ask me........
As for my screen name....yes I can be as cold as dirt.......do some time in a combat zone and you would know what I mean.....but we wouldnt have to worry about your type fighting for anything....you will leave that for the real men.......
If no one in the mid-east wants them to have weapons then if we are to disarm them we need their support as well as EU, Russia and China. You think Iraq is difficult, Iran will be much worse. If we are not to use nuclear weapons, it will be a long bloody war and success is questionable.I think it’s a world that doesn’t want to see a terrorist supporting government with nuclear weapons. The same government that openly calls for the destruction of an entire country and its people. It’s not just the US, no one in the Middle East wants Iran to have nuclear weapons. They understand the dangers that it would only be a matter of time before Iran gave a weapon to one of its terrorists groups. They understand a nuclear Iran will destabilize the entire region.
Well then try again. See answer above, it will not be pretty. We certainly do not need to go at it alone and I would rather see them with weapons than the USA at war with them without world support. Think if the EU nations, the USA, Russia, other mid-east countries and China said "30 days to dismantle or WWIII will be declared on Iran" think they might listen? I have a feeling they might. They are damn sure not going to listen to us! They have all but said go screw yourself.The world has tried, we have provided other options but Iran doesn’t want them.
They want weapons.
Well if I was the president I wouldn’t talk to Iran either. How many attacks has the US suffered by Iran’s terrorists groups? Find the answer to that and get back to me.
The assertion, that cascade-centrifuge systems are only there to produce weapons-grade fissile material is simply wrong. There are cascade-centrifuge systems for civil purposes running at this time. An example is the German enrichment facility in Gronau, which runs a cascade-centrifuge system and it supplies material for nuclear power plants, but it does not supply weapons-grade fissile material.
You call yourself an American.....sorry excuse of one if you ask me........
| Moderator's Warning: |
I expect the Iranian system to be more modern. The cascade-centrifuge system in Natanz consists of 164 centrifuges, this is not a reasonable number to produce weapon grade material and it's more for collecting experiences. The new Natanz plant which is being built at this time will have about 3000 centrifuges, this is theoretical sufficient to produce weapons-grade material for one weapon within one year.Are you stating that this system is the same type of system that Iran has set up? Further, are you stating that the product that it yields is not weapons grade?
The absolute racism in this thread sickens me.
.
This is an interesting move to make this an Euro-bashing thread considering that I have been warned to stay on topic exclusively here :roll:
Yes, I prefer to tell the truth upstairs.Have you ever considered telling the truth rather than lying?
Awww, you would like to be a moderator here, now wouldn't you?I can't speak for the moderators here, but perhaps if you were to start acting in an honest fashion you would find yourself warned less often.
Awww, you would like to be a moderator here, now wouldn't you?
.
Yes, contention would be probable, I guess.Actually, no. No I wouldn't, and the chief reason for that would be that I can envision a particular bone of contention between myself and some or all of the other moderators and administrators here when it comes to the proper handling of those completely without merit.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?