• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Paper: Israel Plans Nuclear Strike On Iran

Sorry but when I read someone calling for the mass murder of 75 million people suggesting that their screen name is apt seems appropriate.

It was more a play on the poster's name than anything else spurred on by the call for genocide something that I cannot accept nor remain silent about under any circumstances.

Is there anything more despicable than someone putting themselves on the same level as a Saddam Hussein because the post that I replied to was written as if Saddam himself were speaking from the grave.

But sorry nonetheless.
To comment on "why" you said what you did is missing the point. The moderator was telling you that, reasons aside, your continual attacks on other posters is unnecessary.
 
To comment on "why" you said what you did is missing the point. The moderator was telling you that, reasons aside, your continual attacks on other posters is unnecessary.
Wrong, again...The mod was referring to a specific post that I wrote in this thread in reply to Cold Dirt's post that called for the nuclear destruction of Iraq and I commented that his screen name was eerily appropriate for the types of things he was writing.

You're reply to this has nothing at all to do with the topic of this thread which is your modus operandi most of the time you post IMHO....
 
Moderator's Warning:
People. Champs addressed the issue and appologized. Stop sniping at each other and get back to the topic. MOVE ON.
 
Wrong, again...The mod was referring to a specific post that I wrote in this thread in reply to Cold Dirt's post that called for the nuclear destruction of Iraq and I commented that his screen name was eerily appropriate for the types of things he was writing.

You're reply to this has nothing at all to do with the topic of this thread which is your modus operandi most of the time you post IMHO....

As usual you are clueless....first I was talking about Iran...learn to read....second, I said I hoped they tried to attack Israel first so israel could level the country full of terrorist.........

Funny how you libs are quick to come running to the defense of the very people acrossing the border to kill US troops.....did it in Vietnam and now doing it in Iraq......

You call yourself an American.....sorry excuse of one if you ask me........

As for my screen name....yes I can be as cold as dirt.......do some time in a combat zone and you would know what I mean.....but we wouldnt have to worry about your type fighting for anything....you will leave that for the real men.......
 
I am a physicist and I thoroughly understand the nuclear fuel cycle. A cascade of one thousand centrifuges can process enough spent uranium byproduct material to yield enough HEU for one nuclear device per year. A typical centrifuge-cascade arcade for producing HEU (Pakistan, N.Korea et. al.) consists of between 3000 and 5000 units.

You must understand something Pete. A nuclear cascade-centrifuge system has one purpose and one purpose only... to produce weapons-grade fissile material. No one invests the time, the money, and the technical and material resources to construct a delicate cascade and then stop in mid-process. To do this would actually destroy the cascade because of the corrosive nature of process-byproducts always present in the system. These corrosive byproducts must be constantly evacuated to avoid a cascade-meltdown.
The assertion, that cascade-centrifuge systems are only there to produce weapons-grade fissile material is simply wrong. There are cascade-centrifuge systems for civil purposes running at this time. An example is the German enrichment facility in Gronau, which runs a cascade-centrifuge system and it supplies material for nuclear power plants, but it does not supply weapons-grade fissile material.
 
As usual you are clueless....first I was talking about Iran...learn to read....second, I said I hoped they tried to attack Israel first so israel could level the country full of terrorist.........

Funny how you libs are quick to come running to the defense of the very people acrossing the border to kill US troops.....did it in Vietnam and now doing it in Iraq......

You call yourself an American.....sorry excuse of one if you ask me........

As for my screen name....yes I can be as cold as dirt.......do some time in a combat zone and you would know what I mean.....but we wouldnt have to worry about your type fighting for anything....you will leave that for the real men.......
I meant to write Iran not Iraq...a mental typo since we all type Iraq so quickly.

Nevertheless for any civilized person to advocate the nuclear destruction of 75 million people under any circumstances is repulsive and in my book there aren't any plausible defenses that someone can write to justify the leveling of an entire nation, not to mention the side effects that would effect all the nations in the region and the entire world politically.

The mere fact that you consistently call for ultra violent solutions clearly defines your "politics" and it is a stance that I find reprehensible and revolting.

What is the most interesting is that you somehow tie machismo into genocide as if being what you perceive of manly makes genocide a viable option.
 
I think it’s a world that doesn’t want to see a terrorist supporting government with nuclear weapons. The same government that openly calls for the destruction of an entire country and its people. It’s not just the US, no one in the Middle East wants Iran to have nuclear weapons. They understand the dangers that it would only be a matter of time before Iran gave a weapon to one of its terrorists groups. They understand a nuclear Iran will destabilize the entire region.
If no one in the mid-east wants them to have weapons then if we are to disarm them we need their support as well as EU, Russia and China. You think Iraq is difficult, Iran will be much worse. If we are not to use nuclear weapons, it will be a long bloody war and success is questionable.
The world has tried, we have provided other options but Iran doesn’t want them.
They want weapons.
Well if I was the president I wouldn’t talk to Iran either. How many attacks has the US suffered by Iran’s terrorists groups? Find the answer to that and get back to me.
Well then try again. See answer above, it will not be pretty. We certainly do not need to go at it alone and I would rather see them with weapons than the USA at war with them without world support. Think if the EU nations, the USA, Russia, other mid-east countries and China said "30 days to dismantle or WWIII will be declared on Iran" think they might listen? I have a feeling they might. They are damn sure not going to listen to us! They have all but said go screw yourself.
 
The absolute racism in this thread sickens me. Let's consider a few things here shall we.....

1) In the six day war, the Soviet Union started a rumor about Israel. The rumor was that Israel was going to attack Syria. The result of this rumor was an Egyptian military movement of tanks towards Israel to show Arab solidarity. Furthermore, Egypt announced that the Straits of Tiran would be closed to "all ships flying Israeli flags." The result was an Israeli military measure to destroy Egypt's air power and to eventually address Syria.

Six-Day War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Of course, many people like to only concern themselves with this history as if it started with the Isreali attack on Egypt. Attempts to show that the rumor was true just because Israel reacted to Egypts aggression and eventually attacked Syria is supposed to prove the rumor correct. (Even America and the Soviet Union used to travel the seas in what is called "Gator Squares" to avoid setting off an enemy reaction to aggression.)

2) The Battle of Jenin was quite a display of how unified human monsters and anit-Semites everywhere can be when there's a chance to bash Jews. It was a terrible dissapointment to people that the "massacre" at Jenin turned out to be a Palestinian hoax. Can anyone produce a German newspaper article that retracted any of their brutal articles that celebrated the "evils" of those Jews in Isreal before the UN revealed the truth?

Battle of Jenin - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And now we have a situation where the Israelis are being chastized for their protection measures. Are people this ignorant of the world or are they so consumed with shame, hate and resentment that they would surrender their integrity to lies, rumors, hoaxes, and basic survival tactics when it comes to Jews? Perhaps this sentiment that Israelis aren't supposed to protect themselves against tyranny will again spur up violence.

Being a U.S. Marine of 15 years, I can attest that our country has attack plans and defense plans for alomost every contingency. These plans do indeed include the use of nuclear weapons. Are people so stupid that they can't fathom that a defense plan against China doesn't have a nuclear index in the book? I guess we "plan to nuclear strike" Beijing. This is true for every nation of good sense in the world. Wherever there is a perceived threat the government in questions has the right and the duty to form a plan to protect its people.

I guess such things are an accepted truth of reality until we include a Jew into the equation. People around the globe, especially in Europe, seem to cling to a shred of hope that if they convince themselves that others are as loathsome now as some of them once so recently were that all of history will be forgotten. Explicit Arab calls for the massacre of Israelis are downplayed while Germans speak indignantly of Israeli "genocide" against Palestinians. Words of nation destruction and genocide by an Iranian leader on international television are downplayed while Europeans and Arabs everywhere stand back and scoff at an Israeli response to defend itself.

The truth is that many Europeans resent historical events not for what occurred, but for what did not. Many wish in vain that Germany had gotten to finish the job they set out to do (while America preserved the self-righteous French). No matter what Israelis do or fail to do, they will be blamed. Europeans, especially many Germans, need to believe that Israelis are every bit as bad as their own grandparents were when they murdered Jews all morning, sat down for lunch, played some cards, and then murdered Jews all afternoon.
 
What did the Germans do here? A German correspondent did some investigation about this article, called one of the experts who has been interviewed for this article by one of the authors of this article and came to the conclusion, that this article is simply wrong.

He did so within a few hours, kudos to him :mrgreen:
 
The assertion, that cascade-centrifuge systems are only there to produce weapons-grade fissile material is simply wrong. There are cascade-centrifuge systems for civil purposes running at this time. An example is the German enrichment facility in Gronau, which runs a cascade-centrifuge system and it supplies material for nuclear power plants, but it does not supply weapons-grade fissile material.

Are you stating that this system is the same type of system that Iran has set up? Further, are you stating that the product that it yields is not weapons grade?
 
You call yourself an American.....sorry excuse of one if you ask me........

Moderator's Warning:
Second and last warning, folks. I don't care who started it...stop the personal attacks.
 
Are you stating that this system is the same type of system that Iran has set up? Further, are you stating that the product that it yields is not weapons grade?
I expect the Iranian system to be more modern. The cascade-centrifuge system in Natanz consists of 164 centrifuges, this is not a reasonable number to produce weapon grade material and it's more for collecting experiences. The new Natanz plant which is being built at this time will have about 3000 centrifuges, this is theoretical sufficient to produce weapons-grade material for one weapon within one year.

As far as I know, the German plant in Gronau could be modified to produce weapons-grade material, if there would be an ok by the government.

Only like 4 to 5 % enrichment are needed to run a nuclear power plant, about 93 % is needed for a weapon.
 
Cherokee I can understand you problems... BUT HERE IS MY PROBLEM..... THE ONLY PERSON WHO BENFITTED IN THAT ENTIRE DEBACLE WITH THE CIA counterinteilligence unit WAS KHAN HIMSELF!!!!!!!
look at how many people SUFFERRED BECAUSE OF THAT DIASTER!!!! prove me WRONG!!! I I'll listen to your debate.....
but again...


THE ONLY PERSON WHO PROSPERRED WAS KHAN!!!!
therefore one has to wonder if Carter WASN't an operative of his...
 
The absolute racism in this thread sickens me.
.



This, and any other thread into which these racists slog.

I swear that if online political forums are any indication (this being not the only one by a long shot) Europe is so thoroughly antisemitic as to be beyond redemption.

The fact that they lie so frequently in regards to Ahmadinejad ("why he's never threatened Israel, [eye bat, eye bat]" is simply a product of their indoctrination and reveals their fundamentalist nature. They lie like this rather than tell the truth because they live in a culture that ostracises anybody who doesn't toe the same antisemitic line, and the reason they toe this line is beyond their ability to comprehend.

Europe whores for it's oil, and the form of its whoring is their taking on the same racist points of view as those with whom they are attempting to curry favor. Over the last 40 years, European media has so thoroughly indoctrinated people in the Eurabian point of vew that we have now arrived at a point much like the classic passage in 1984 where the inquisitor holds up two fingers and Winston Smith rapturously declares he sees 3 that what counts isn't what the Iranian leadership keeps saying, it's what people want to believe.

Heck, and nobody even needed to torture them, either.
 
This is an interesting move to make this an Euro-bashing thread considering that I have been warned to stay on topic exclusively here :roll:
 
This is an interesting move to make this an Euro-bashing thread considering that I have been warned to stay on topic exclusively here :roll:

Have you ever considered telling the truth rather than lying? I can't speak for the moderators here, but perhaps if you were to start acting in an honest fashion you would find yourself warned less often.
 
Have you ever considered telling the truth rather than lying?
Yes, I prefer to tell the truth upstairs.

I can't speak for the moderators here, but perhaps if you were to start acting in an honest fashion you would find yourself warned less often.
Awww, you would like to be a moderator here, now wouldn't you?

The topic here is an article about alleged plans and training units of Israelian forces against Iran.
 
Awww, you would like to be a moderator here, now wouldn't you?

.

Actually, no. No I wouldn't, and the chief reason for that would be that I can envision a particular bone of contention between myself and some or all of the other moderators and administrators here when it comes to the proper handling of those completely without merit.
 
Actually, no. No I wouldn't, and the chief reason for that would be that I can envision a particular bone of contention between myself and some or all of the other moderators and administrators here when it comes to the proper handling of those completely without merit.
Yes, contention would be probable, I guess.

Now don't be completely without merit according to the topic of the thread.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Volker and Gardener - Disengage, take it to PM, take it to the Basement. Those are your three options. No more of this upstairs
 
Back
Top Bottom