• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Palin says Obama should boycott Copenhagen over hacked e-mails

Nope you just ignored the numbers and hero worshipped Palin then scutted off.

-------->http://www.debatepolitics.com<---------

Nope. That's just your imagination eclipsing your honesty again.

:kitty: :kitty: :kitty:

Besides, this is a completely different thread. If you weren't so intent on melting down for us, you would at least attempt to stay on topic in this thread.

:kitty: :kitty:
 
You wouldnt know honesty if it climbed up to your lap and gave you a handjob. You were wrong in that thread much like you're wrong now. In that thread you lost sanity and just kept celebrating and then nanced away. I responded to poll numbers someone cited which were inaccurate. Tell me which part of your rant about Reverand Wright in this thread was on topic and not a "meltdown" as you keep claiming?
 
Last edited:

I don't really see how any of this addresses this thread topic. I find you a little bothersome when you are melting down and staying on topic with your tantrum. I find it much more difficult to overlook your intellectual shortcomings when you are just randomly trolling threads like this and doing nothing to address the topic.

:kitty: :kitty: :kitty:
 

You should look a little farther than a source that meets your pre-conceptions.

From an article at the National Catholic Reporter:


WikiAnswers - What church denomination is Sarah Palin


A Visit to Palin?s Church | Newsweek Religion | Newsweek.com

I guess it just depends on where she is on Sunday.
 

Uhhhhhhh....... it's Sunday, and that's where they live? :2wave:
 
I'm sure Cheney had one too when he looked at these numbers :lol:

Naaaaa.... he's not due for a new stent for at least another 3 years. :mrgreen:
 
aw more hypocrisy from jall. You werent on topic when you were discussing Obama and reverand Wright but you want to call me out when I address a point someone made. The only one trolling here is you Jall. You've been whining a lot the last few days about other people. You whine off topic when someone creates a thread about Palin. You whine when there's a topic about fox without ever addressing the topic. Thats an awfully big glass house youmre living in. Once again jall im sorry to disappoint you but Im not your type stop making topics about other people and focus on yourself. Its obvious you cant play with the adults so you come to whine. Nance along now.
 
Last edited:

I was directly on topic using an illustration to rebutt a point made during the course of discussing the topic.

You, however, keep mindlessly trolling this thread looking for some vindication for your trolling through discussing me.

Your meltdown continues.

:kitty: :kitty: :kitty:
 
I was directly on topic using an illustration to rebutt a point made during the course of discussing the topic.

:ssst:

Freudian slip?
 
Ummm, because it's Israel...homeland of the Jews? And it's what they've been doing since Israel was founded.

Just a guess.:shrug:



Uhhhhhhh....... it's Sunday, and that's where they live? :2wave:

What does Sunday have to do with being Jewish? And, 'they' live everywhere .... however, she said the Jews would be gathering in Israel in the weeks and months ahead in response to a question about continuing building settlements.

 
Last edited:
Got it.....I apologize then.

However, should Palin also decry some of the more extreme teachings of evangelicals?


Why? She's not a theologian. She's not responsible for decrying other people's religious beliefs.
 
I don't see any evidence she is an Evangelical. I see evidence she has attended a few Evangelical churches.

Just like there was no evidence Obama was a "black liberation" theology adherent. He just attended a black liberation theology church.


Palin attended evangelical churches for decades. Why is it wrong to call her an evangelical? Unlike the Catholic Church, where you actually have to be baptised a Catholic, I'm not aware of anything similar in Protestant churches. You are baptized a Christian, and you 'are' whatever denomination you choose to worship as.


I don't understand why Palin would choose to attend a Pentecostal church if she wasn't Pentecostal, though? :shrug:







And, btw, Barack Obama's church was a mainline protestant church. You, as a Catholic, are not responsible for the rantings of a Catholic priest (and they are legion), neither is Barack Obama responsible for the rantings of Rev Wright.
 
Which means he SHOULD'VE been responsible and walked out


If you say so. I never understood the whole 'church shopping' debate. But, I grew up Catholic - you went to the Catholic Church in town, regardless of how bat**** crazy the priests were (and some of them were very crazy). The Lutheran, or Episcopalian Churches, or any of the others were just not an option. :shrug:
 
Forunately, Palin is not in any position to influence US foreign policies, but unforunately, her ignorant blathering is given a lot of attention.
 

Ok...Jall...you really need to get rid of those Hello Kitty's....they're creeping me out a little.

You need to find a little picture of Stich!.....
 
Forunately, Palin is not in any position to influence US foreign policies, but unforunately, her ignorant blathering is given a lot of attention.
It's a good thing yours isn't.
 
well, let's see. what we DO know of her beliefs are consistent with evangelical doctrine, and she attends evangelical churches. she's been exorcised.

e·van·gel·i·cal (vn-jl-kl, vn-) also e·van·gel·ic (-jlk)
adj.
1. Of, relating to, or in accordance with the Christian gospel, especially one of the four gospel books of the New Testament.
2. Evangelical Of, relating to, or being a Protestant church that founds its teaching on the gospel.
3. Evangelical Of, relating to, or being a Christian church believing in the sole authority and inerrancy of the Bible, in salvation only through regeneration, and in a spiritually transformed personal life.
4. Evangelical
a. Of or relating to the Lutheran churches in Germany and Switzerland.
b. Of or relating to all Protestant churches in Germany.
5. Of or relating to the group in the Church of England that stresses personal conversion and salvation by faith.
6. Characterized by ardent or crusading enthusiasm; zealous: an evangelical liberal.
n.
Evangelical A member of an evangelical church or party.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Palin says Obama should boycott Copenhagen over hacked e-mails



Is this chick for real? What scares me is that people actually listen to her.


What scares me is that people turn a blind eye to this ponzi scheme that is AGW

The Emperor not only has no clothes, she's an empty-headed twit to boot.



Uhm Palin as far as I can tell didn't win, nor did McCain die... Your analogy fails. You should choose more intelligent discourse before calling people twits. Just sayin.... :lol:
 
Why? She's not a theologian. She's not responsible for decrying other people's religious beliefs.

I'm not saying that she should....but those who are the loudest about Obama's involvement with Wright's church...tend to want to give Palin a pass on the teachings of her right-wing churches.
 
Palin has her own pastor problems...


Under God: Palin's Pastor Problem - David Waters
 
Palin says Obama should boycott Copenhagen over hacked e-mails



Is this chick for real? What scares me is that people actually listen to her.

The Emperor not only has no clothes, she's an empty-headed twit to boot.

What folks like yourself are missing here is the fact that there are two seperate arguments, or issues, at work here. One is the data/facts. The other is the hype of dire predictions formulated by the research findings.

Palin is essentially targetting the hype when she criticizes the hacked emails. Al Gore responds to her statements by bringing up the melting ice sheets (fact). She never questioned the current state of the planet. And when he did speak about the emails, he mischaracterized them.

It is fact there are changes in the metrix. But there is no proof of pending doom that will eclipse anything man has faced thus far.
 
Last edited:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…