• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Palestine and the Real Middle East

I posted about the Israeli ceasefire in *Breaking News* before Hamas realized its stupidity and tried to play catch-up with its own ceasefire.

Look at the time differential in the two stories GENIUS.

Tashah said:
Isn't it a war crime to refuse to end a war?

It would be like me posting that you lost this debate because you have failed to respond to this message that I am still in the process of writing.

That was your question, and I answered it.
 
It would be like me posting that you lost this debate because you have failed to respond to this message that I am still in the process of writing. That was your question, and I answered it.
Hamas had every opportunity to announce a unilateral ceasefire first. They didn't. Israel did it first, and Hamas had to follow suit or take a PR beating.
 
Hamas had every opportunity to announce a unilateral ceasefire first. They didn't. Israel did it first, and Hamas had to follow suit or take a PR beating.

It is _always_ up to the aggressor [they who started the fight, in this case, as always, the Zionists], and not the defender, [in this case, as always, the Palestinian peoples] to "first cry hold, enough". Especially when the aggressor is standing on your property, not his.

Hamas could not call for a ceasefire unilaterally under these conditions, as it would be nothing more than an abject confession of defeat, and an acceptance of any evil the Zionists have committed already, or choose to commit in future.

The only ones taking "a PR beating" are the Zionists; even in the USA, where, since Harry Truman, only Zionists can get elected to public office. Once again the Zionists underestimated the determination of the Palestinian people to resist Zionist enslavement, and the bloodshed lasted so long that the world had no time to turn its head away and forget about it. And so, one more time, Zionism has been shown up again as the most evil ideology since Nazism.

According to you, Tasha, you are an extremely intelligent person. So how can you possibly expect that this rubbish of yours will be taken seriously by any non-Zionist with an above-room-temperature I.Q.?!?
 
The only ones taking "a PR beating" are the Zionists; even in the USA, where, since Harry Truman, only Zionists can get elected to public office.
Lol. Even Arafat would laugh at such contrived crappola.

According to you, Tasha, you are an extremely intelligent person. So how can you possibly expect that this rubbish of yours will be taken seriously by any non-Zionist with an above-room-temperature I.Q.?!?
You can't even spell a name correctly. The IQ of a chipmonk.
 
Lol. Even Arafat would laugh at such contrived crappola.


You can't even spell a name correctly. The IQ of a chipmonk.

What's a "chipmonk"?! Never mind,several hilarious images are already coming to mind.
 
And who does the blockade affect? The 10,000 Hamas militants? Are the other 1.4 million civilians not affected by this blockade?
Like I said before, the blockade's purpose can be anything you want. But the actual effects of this sanction collectively punishes the entire population in Gaza.

:doh

So...And your point is?
Maybe if the 1.4 million had some....whats the word? Oh yea GUTS they wouldn't have ALLOWED the 10k Hamas to destroy their lives.
 
So...And your point is?
Maybe if the 1.4 million had some....whats the word? Oh yea GUTS they wouldn't have ALLOWED the 10k Hamas to destroy their lives.

Majority of Palestinians in Gaza are under the age of 14. Damn those children for not standing up to Hamas!!!!

Maybe if Israel didn't fund Hamas to divide support for the PLO decades ago they wouldn't have this problem.

At least you are agreeing that it IS collective punishment whichever way you want to see it.
 
Majority of Palestinians in Gaza are under the age of 14. Damn those children for not standing up to Hamas!!!!

Maybe if Israel didn't fund Hamas to divide support for the PLO decades ago they wouldn't have this problem.

At least you are agreeing that it IS collective punishment whichever way you want to see it.

Making excuses for Hamas and those the support them is undignified.

You should be ashamed of yourself.
 
Majority of Palestinians in Gaza are under the age of 14. Damn those children for not standing up to Hamas!!!!

Maybe if Israel didn't fund Hamas to divide support for the PLO decades ago they wouldn't have this problem.

At least you are agreeing that it IS collective punishment whichever way you want to see it.

Really? Do you have any proof the "Majority" are kids?
Wow you mean back when the PLO was in total power?
collective punishment? No its not collective punishment.
Collective punishment is nuking Gaza... Hmm I wonder?...
Never mind the fall out might drift over Israel.
 
Really? Do you have any proof the "Majority" are kids?
Wow you mean back when the PLO was in total power?
collective punishment? No its not collective punishment.
Collective punishment is nuking Gaza... Hmm I wonder?...
Never mind the fall out might drift over Israel.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/we.html
Majority of Palestinians are kids, if you take 18 years old as reaching adulthood.

Does it matter who was in power? Israel still funded Hamas then.

I suggest you re-read the definition of collective punishment:
Collective punishment is the punishment of a group of people as a result of the behavior of one or more other individuals or groups.
Collective punishment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Also, read this assessment by Amnesty International regarding the blockade of Gaza: http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/a...de-11dd-9394-c975c4bd488d/mde150212008eng.pdf

The blockade is and has always been collective punishment.
 
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/we.html
Majority of Palestinians are kids, if you take 18 years old as reaching adulthood.
No you said UNDER AGE 14. Now back up and admit you lied.

Does it matter who was in power? Israel still funded Hamas then.
Yes it does. The US supported the islamortards in Afghan during the soviet invasion. Do you understand now?


I suggest you re-read the definition of collective punishment:

Collective punishment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Also, read this assessment by Amnesty International regarding the blockade of Gaza: http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/a...de-11dd-9394-c975c4bd488d/mde150212008eng.pdf

The blockade is and has always been collective punishment.

You have to care about a people before you can say they suffered your opinion of "Collective punishment" these sand monkeys (all ages) have shown over and over again they prefer death and destruction to peace so lets be very clear I wouldn't give a rats arse if all of them died tomorrow just like they wouldn't care if the US was destroyed overnight.
 
No you said UNDER AGE 14. Now back up and admit you lied.
And you asked if I had proof the majority of Palestinians were KIDS. Back up and sit back down.
Yes it does. The US supported the islamortards in Afghan during the soviet invasion. Do you understand now?
Sounds like America is half as retarded as Israel.


You have to care about a people before you can say they suffered your opinion of "Collective punishment" these sand monkeys (all ages) have shown over and over again they prefer death and destruction to peace so lets be very clear I wouldn't give a rats arse if all of them died tomorrow just like they wouldn't care if the US was destroyed overnight.
So that is your response to a war crime? I wouldn't expect anything less from someone as ignorant as yourself. Good debating tact. You have nothing to refute that it IS A WAR CRIME, so you just play the name-call, I don't-give-a-flying-f**k card. Good for you.
 
And you asked if I had proof the majority of Palestinians were KIDS. Back up and sit back down.
Thats your response to being caught in a bold face lie?

Sounds like America is half as retarded as Israel.
Maybe, maybe not. Who won the cold war again?
Too bad we have the power to destroy the entire world huh?

So that is your response to a war crime? I wouldn't expect anything less from someone as ignorant as yourself. Good debating tact. You have nothing to refute that it IS A WAR CRIME, so you just play the name-call, I don't-give-a-flying-f**k card. Good for you.

Tell me again why I should care about terrorist sand monkeys that wish for dead Americans?
 
Moderator's Warning:
cherokee, enough with the racial slurs. "sand monkeys" is not acceptable.
 
Thats your response to being caught in a bold face lie?
Yes, that lie was so bold! 38% of Gaza's population is below 14 years old. If I said the majority was under 18 you wouldn't even be trying to refute that.
Maybe, maybe not. Who won the cold war again?
Too bad we have the power to destroy the entire world huh?

Who lost in Vietnam, Korea, and Iraq?
And guess what? A bunch of other countries have the power to destroy the world. India and China to name a couple. And I'm pretty sure the PLA would destroy the US Armed Forces in an all out war. At least China is NFU and doesn't lose nuclear weapons: BBC NEWS | Europe | Mystery of lost US nuclear bomb

Tell me again why I should care about terrorist sand monkeys that wish for dead Americans?

Who told you to care about the terrorists? I most certainly didn't. Although you could say I have a weak heart for the innocent.
 
Yes, that lie was so bold! 38% of Gaza's population is below 14 years old. If I said the majority was under 18 you wouldn't even be trying to refute that.

You posted
Majority of Palestinians in Gaza are under the age of 14. Damn those children for not standing up to Hamas!!!!

West Bank

Population
2,407,681
note: in addition, there are about 187,000 Israeli settlers in the West Bank and fewer than 177,000 in East Jerusalem (July 2008 est.)

0-14 years: 38% (male 469,754/female 445,999)
15-64 years: 58.3% (male 719,267/female 684,790)
65 years and over: 3.6% (male 36,606/female 51,265) (2008 est.)

This have been proven by your own link to be a lie. You just like all the other islamotards you have tried to twist the facts to fit your own belief. When questioned on your supposed facts you tried to change the numbers to
"under 18" to raise your numbers. Guess what? You stilled failed.


Who lost in Vietnam, Korea, and Iraq?
And guess what? A bunch of other countries have the power to destroy the world. India and China to name a couple. And I'm pretty sure the PLA would destroy the US Armed Forces in an all out war. At least China is NFU and doesn't lose nuclear weapons: BBC NEWS | Europe | Mystery of lost US nuclear bomb

In Vietnam the US won every major battle including the TET offensive but weak minded people like yourself thought otherwise so the US pulled out.

In Korea the US has never signed a peace treaty, but I'm sure you knew that didn't you? Btw Nk is starving its people into nothingness while SK lives on building a far better life. The capita income for NK is about $1,800 while the capita income for SK is $24,500. You do the math and tell me just who won.


Who told you to care about the terrorists? I most certainly didn't. Although you could say I have a weak heart for the innocent.

Maybe its because you sound like the rest of the islamtards
Just a guess.

BTW Prove those killed are innocent.
 
[QUOTE/] BTW Prove those killed are innocent.[/QUOTE]

As an former Marine, I would assume that you are familiar with battles in dense Urban Terrain. It is fair to say that firing even accurate high-explosive bombs and artillery rounds into dense urban terrain are going to kill a ot of non-combatants (military speak for innocent civlians).

Unless you are willing to cross some steep humanitarian and morale lines to simply scoop the majority of Palestinians who are merely fathers, mothers, brothers, and sisters under the guise of 'Hamas Terrorists' to declare them all combantants, there is a good bet that you are killing innocent civilians.

If you take that step you will also be unilaterally abborgating the Geneva and Hague Conventions, and that is a sure way to inflame rather than quell and enemy.

What that has to do with Arab Nations desire to avoid involvement in unecessary killing is beyond me.
 
[QUOTE/] BTW Prove those killed are innocent.

As an former Marine, I would assume that you are familiar with battles in dense Urban Terrain. It is fair to say that firing even accurate high-explosive bombs and artillery rounds into dense urban terrain are going to kill a ot of non-combatants (military speak for innocent civlians).

Unless you are willing to cross some steep humanitarian and morale lines to simply scoop the majority of Palestinians who are merely fathers, mothers, brothers, and sisters under the guise of 'Hamas Terrorists' to declare them all combantants, there is a good bet that you are killing innocent civilians.

If you take that step you will also be unilaterally abborgating the Geneva and Hague Conventions, and that is a sure way to inflame rather than quell and enemy.

What that has to do with Arab Nations desire to avoid involvement in unecessary killing is beyond me.[/QUOTE]

Actually, dead and crippled civilians, including small children are what the USA calls "collateral damage", and the Israeli armed forces call "human shields". No matter the euphemism you dress it up with, a deliberately murdered human being, 'collateral damage' or 'human shield' or 'innocent bystander' or whatever, that person is still the deliberately murdered/crippled victim of an evil doer.
 
Jakers, I see you are still up to your polemics?

The intent of the previous post was to point out demanding proof of innocence death in densely populated areas is silly, as combat in these areas will involve the death of innocent civilians. It is why I, and so many Arab governments, were so critical of Hamas’s decision to resort to war (and not coincidentally why I started this thread).

There is that concept called the reality on the ground. I know this seem somewhat obtuse to you, but it is the reality of combat in any war. When people start killing one another, it is not exactly a safe sport without consequences. Some examples:

As an Israeli soldier, while taking mortar rounds in Gaza, would you call for counter battery fire on the mortar even in dense urban terrain? Or would you let your friends and fellow soldiers die to meet some esoteric concept of morality?

As a Hamas militant (a terrorist to some), would you not fire those rockets toward Israel because they are inaccurate and will most likely also cause ‘collateral damage?’

I would challenge you to drop the emotionally laced charges of one sided evil doing in war. On both sides there are very real people that are in most cases trying to the best they can. Some do it honestly but poorly. Some do it well. Some are merely mediocre. Some simply do not care. Very few are the kind of pure evil you find in Hitler, and neither side in the Middle East fits that pattern.
 
Jakers, I see you are still up to your polemics?

The intent of the previous post was to point out demanding proof of innocence death in densely populated areas is silly, as combat in these areas will involve the death of innocent civilians. It is why I, and so many Arab governments, were so critical of Hamas’s decision to resort to war (and not coincidentally why I started this thread).

There is that concept called the reality on the ground. I know this seem somewhat obtuse to you, but it is the reality of combat in any war. When people start killing one another, it is not exactly a safe sport without consequences. Some examples:

As an Israeli soldier, while taking mortar rounds in Gaza, would you call for counter battery fire on the mortar even in dense urban terrain? Or would you let your friends and fellow soldiers die to meet some esoteric concept of morality?

As a Hamas militant (a terrorist to some), would you not fire those rockets toward Israel because they are inaccurate and will most likely also cause ‘collateral damage?’

I would challenge you to drop the emotionally laced charges of one sided evil doing in war. On both sides there are very real people that are in most cases trying to the best they can. Some do it honestly but poorly. Some do it well. Some are merely mediocre. Some simply do not care. Very few are the kind of pure evil you find in Hitler, and neither side in the Middle East fits that pattern.

It's all very well to skip over the original cause of the horrors of armed combat, and say, well, now that we're in it, there ain't no bad guys, just folks doin' bad stuff because, without them having any say in the matter, they found themselves killing and crippling other human beings, many of whom were not trying to kill or cripple them.

The truth is, those that initiate a great evil bear the brunt of the moral responsibility for every particular evil that follows from that evil. The political theory of Zionism, i.e.,"the Jewish State built on other people's property, to the exclusion of non-jews, including the present residents", was the original evil, and its implementation and and continuance are morally to blame, to a large extent, for every drop of blood shed by both 'sides' from start to present.

It does not matter that this individual or that is not what he or she thinks of as, 'a bad person'. Those who who do cruel and unjust acts for an evil purpose, or who support others who do such things for an evil purpose, are not 'good people'. They may be ordinary human beings, but if they have not taken the time to closely examine their own consciences [if they have such a thing--many do not] and see where what they believe is wrong/evil, and what they do is wrong/evil because what they believe is wrong/evil, so that even what they passively condone is wrong/evil, then they will never take any measures to end their wrong/evil, and that is just plain wrong/evil.

So I'm not impressed with hand-waving away the moral responsibility for slaughter and suffering on the basis that wars 'just happen', and once you're in one 'sh-t happens', and so nobody is 'really' morally corrupt, it's all just some kind of accidental mess that people 'fell into' so nobody is is evil, because nobody is to blajme for any of it. That kind of moral rationalization can be heard from any self-excusing criminal.
 
akers, do you enjoy emotional outbursts, filled with hyperbole and emotion rhetoric? It would seem that your latest response contains nothing but emotional accusations and has no bearing on any of the actual issues presented.

So, Israel is ‘evil’ in your opinion, even though it was Hamas abrogated the cease fire and returned the issue to the state of a shooting war. And yes Jakers, once a shooting war starts, your simplest characterization of morality changes markedly. Soldiers do not start wars, they fight them. Soldiers on both sides fight to win, and, quite literally, the fight with their very lives to win. Not unimportantly, soldiers on both sides are using horrific violence to try and kill the other side, and it is the same in any and every war that ever was and will be fought.

Some salient points you failed to address in your tirade? How is Israel evil for fighting a war they did not start (but doing so well), so bombs are bad, and how is Hamas the good guys for fighting a war they started poorly (so rockets are somehow imbued with morality – they are somehow righteous and their victims are …. Well somehow not dead?)

In your latest spiel, you declare Israel evil and subject to your moral pronunciation of guilt. So what shall we do with your emotionally declarative guilt? Shall we muster and Army and remove the stain of Israel from existence? Shall we kill even more and with equal indiscrimination because you have branded an entire nation as ‘evil doers’?

What you have managed to prove is that you are young, have clearly never seen combat or its consequences, and have no idea of what the consequences are of your positions if acted upon. The reality of what happens on the ground seems to elude both your intellect and your moral pronunciations.

So please, if you choose to debate, debate. And, for the record, you debate by selecting key point that you differ with and providing fact based analysis in response. The emotional diatribes are neither helpful nor desired. And, so you know, inferring that those that disagree with you are closet criminals does not strengthen your position (which isn’t fact based to begin with). It is rude and improper for a debate forum.

Main point: If Israel is wrong by launching bombs, then why is Hamas right by launching rockets? Please respond without the word ‘evil,’ and try to base your opinion on facts. What is happening in Palestine is not about you.
 
Who lost in Vietnam, Korea, and Iraq?


The US did not lose these wars. We in Korea and Vietnam a ceasefire was agreed upon. The Koreans kept their end ... the Vietnamese did not.

Cease your baseless liberal propaganda.
 
akers, do you enjoy emotional outbursts, filled with hyperbole and emotion rhetoric? It would seem that your latest response contains nothing but emotional accusations and has no bearing on any of the actual issues presented.

You say that my post wrt the occupation of a portion of the Middle East by an ethnic European Jewish population committed to a political ideology called Zionism, wherebye the original inhabitants are to be displaced so that henceforth Jews might have their own "state", wherein, by law, they shall always make and sustain their own numerical/political majority, and dominance, at any cost, "has no bearing on any of the actual issues presented" I say that's ridiculous.

So, Israel is ‘evil’ in your opinion, even though it was Hamas abrogated the cease fire and returned the issue to the state of a shooting war.

Yes, Israel is an evil country created out of an evil political ideal that was and is still is sustained solely by violence and terror. You claim Hamas is responsible for the latest round of blood-letting. In fact, even that is not true. More importantly, this is just the latest battle in a long string of battles in a war started by an invading Zionist population. It is the evil of the invasion, and the war it ignited, that started and is responsible for all the evil to follow. Trying to pretend that there was no history to the current carnage and that somehow the victims are responsible for their own suffering is lower than low.

And yes Jakers, once a shooting war starts, your simplest characterization of morality changes markedly. Soldiers do not start wars, they fight them. Soldiers on both sides fight to win, and, quite literally, the fight with their very lives to win. Not unimportantly, soldiers on both sides are using horrific violence to try and kill the other side, and it is the same in any and every war that ever was and will be fought.

Gee, thanks for condescending to tell me what I already know. I guess you missed the part where I said that Zionist ideology was ultimately to blame, or at least, everyone who accepts and supports the Zionist ideology is ultimately, largely to blame for all the evil committed by both sides, but that does not excuse any individual who takes it upon himself to increase that evil by, say, destroying buildings that are known to shelter non-combatants. Or as you guys call them, 'human shields'. When you're not referring to them as 'monkeys', or whatever.

Some salient points you failed to address in your tirade? How is Israel evil for fighting a war they did not start

Salient point #1-- the Zionists did start and have incessantly continued their war of invasion and occupation of a land they have no right to possess, even if they have illegitimately carved a 'state' out of 80% of it, and are actively seeking to annex the remaining 20%.

So let let us hear no more nonsense about how the Zionists did not start the war. They did. And they have restarted it whenever it suited them. As in the current battle in Gaza.

(but doing so well), so bombs are bad, and how is Hamas the good guys for fighting a war they started poorly (so rockets are somehow imbued with morality – they are somehow righteous and their victims are …. Well somehow not dead?)

You choose to believe that Hamas began this latest battle. I see no hard evidence that a/ Israel ever complied with the terms of the ceasefire, meaning that there never was a true cease fire to violate, and b/ everybody with any sense can see that the Zionist politicians in Israel were looking for a way to jack themselves up in the polls, particularly before their buddy Bush and his gang of neo-cons [read, Zionists] were replaced by a less zealous and not quite so totally biased crew under Barack Obama. The only people who can't see through the smoke you guys are blowing are either singularly stupid, utterly uninformed, or totally committed to Zionism and the growth and maintenance of a purely Jewish state [racial purity, and all that] on other people's property.

In your latest spiel, you declare Israel evil and subject to your moral pronunciation of guilt. So what shall we do with your emotionally declarative guilt? Shall we muster and Army and remove the stain of Israel from existence? Shall we kill even more and with equal indiscrimination because you have branded an entire nation as ‘evil doers’?

Are you seriously asking me what I believe the right, just, and moral thing to do would be? Even though you know that those responsible for the evil, from the beginning until now, will never ever do the right and moral thing? Not until everyone, particularly the USA, puts pressure on them [let's try an international embargo, see how they like it, shall we?] to do so, they won't. But, thanks to the political makeup of the USA, that's never going to happen, either. Nothing to do but watch the carnage until the Zionists have killed or driven off the last Palestinian from their homeland.


But still, I'll tell you what the first step should be, anyway, even though I've already told you it a hundred times. Abandon Zionism and consign it to the rubbish heap of very bad political ideas. Since this first step is never going to happen, there's no point in outlining the follow-up.

Main point: If Israel is wrong by launching bombs, then why is Hamas right by launching rockets? Please respond without the word ‘evil,’ and try to base your opinion on facts. What is happening in Palestine is not about you.

What is happening in Palestine is about me, and about every other human being on this planet. In this modern world, there is no tin pot squabble in some foreign land that is none of my concern and everyone else's. We are all involved.

Resistance to an evil aggressor like the Zionist invaders is self-defense, something that all but the most extreme pacifists would consider moral and just. That is why Hamas, or Palestinians generally, do no evil when they fight back with whatever pathetic means are available to them.

Dropping bombs on whomever you please, whenever you please, wherever you please, in order to extort that which you want from the unwilling, is just gangsterism. Worse, since to my knowledge not even Al Capone would kill his enemy's wives and children in order to get what he wanted. Israel kills 'no matter who' as carelessly as if it were swatting flies, and does it nearly as often as the average picnic-goer smacks a bug.
 
Jakers:
You failed even a simple challenge. You are apparently unable to write even a single post without using the word 'Evil'?

And of course, you failed to address the main point (yet again).

The main point is that if Israeli bombs are dropped and thus evil, how are rockets fired from Hamas .... good?

Here is some more of that reality on the ground. I've worked with the IDF. I have worked with the militaries of many Arab nations. On both sides, I have found considerate, honorable men and women, who are trying their hardest to do what is best for their people. Your emotive calls delivered between boughts of X-box do not meet with the reality of the very real people actually living in the ME. A place you apparently, and despite your calls of concern, don't care enough about to even visit.

In fact, one of the most honorable men I know is an Iraqi General. Just a few years ago, as a member of the Iraqi military, he was painted with the same broad brush of 'evil' you use so easily when Saddam held the reigns.

Saddam was evil. His policies were horrific. And when his caustic influence was removed, men like this Iraqi General who had been moving behind the scenes to prevent what atrocities they could came to the forefront. In this case, this General took over a JAM riddled security organization, demanded loyalty to the constitution of Iraq and purged every member of that organization that disagreed with that approach or had different politics. He installed competent subordinate commanders and promotes based on merit rather than loyalty. The result, in less than two years has been the complete turn around of an organization that was on the verge of being disbanded. His forces alone stood in the initial assault in Basarah, and are now involved in every sensitive spot in Iraq where their loyalty to the Iraqi constitution has kept them out of emotional local politics and made them into the honest brokers so badly needed in Iraq. As security improves, as the politics of Iraq come down to less emotional levels, this General is now working behind the scenes, as he once did at the risk of his own life, to set the stage for economic development inside Iraq.

I learned what real leadership is from an Iraqi General. I learned what moral courage was from a man once painted in the same broad brush of evil you wield with detached aplomb. My life has been greatly enriched by having met this hitherto ‘evil’ man.

Your passion may be admirable, but passion unconstrained by wisdom and the bounds of our own morality is a dangerous thing. In short Jakers, if bombs are evil, then so too are rockets and we must find a policy that prevents either from being used.
 
Jakers:
You failed even a simple challenge. You are apparently unable to write even a single post without using the word 'Evil'?

What do I care for your challenges. Who the heck are you, when you're at home? And yes, I am able to post about Israel without using the word 'evil', but I can think of no good reason why I should do so. Evil is as evil does, and a spade should be called a spade.

The main point is that if Israeli bombs are dropped and thus evil, how are rockets fired from Hamas .... good?

I told you that. Are some answers so unwanted that you just can't see them?!? Palestinian insurgents fighting to save what's left of their property, and their children's property, from the theiving hands of an EVIL invader, is a morally good, just, honourable, and morally laudable act. Even kamikaze self-destruction, when your own life is all you've got to fight with.

Bombing the hell out of crowded cities, towns, and buildings in order to kill or terrorize enough people that they'll run away and leave their property in your bloody hands, that's bone EVIL. Got it, this time?!?!?

Here is some more of that reality on the ground. I've worked with the IDF.

Why am I not surprised to hear that?!?

I have worked with the militaries of many Arab nations. On both sides, I have found considerate, honorable men and women, who are trying their hardest to do what is best for their people. Your emotive calls delivered between boughts of X-box do not meet with the reality of the very real people actually living in the ME.

The heck you say. I know very well that human beings are the same everywhere. I never claimed that decent people do not get caught up in places where they end up doing evil things, [and often suffering terribly cfor it the rest of their lives, in nightmares awake or sleeping]. Do not try to lecture me about the human condition. I dare say I know at least as much about it as you ever will. What I do say that when people do things for EVIL reasons, their acts are EVIL. US pilots who napalmed Vietnamese villages committed EVIL acts, no matter that they were real nice guys back home in Wichita or Bangor or wherever. And anyone back home in Wichita, Bangor, or wherever, who applauded the napalming, or even the simple machine-gunning, of Vietnamese people because they believe that "America is always right and good and just, and those commies have to be stopped somehow, anyhow", also committed EVIL.

A place you apparently, and despite your calls of concern, don't care enough about to even visit.

What makes you think I've got my own jet airplane? Besides, there are enough cesspools and abattoirs right around home, and I don't visit them either, if I can avoid it.

In fact, one of the most honorable men I know is an Iraqi General. Just a few years ago, as a member of the Iraqi military, he was painted with the same broad brush of 'evil' you use so easily when Saddam held the reigns.

He wasn't so painted by me, so what's your point? In fact, I'm pretty sure that everyone who did so paint him were neo-cons, aka, Zionists.


My life has been greatly enriched by having met this hitherto ‘evil’ man.

Good. Irrelevant, a red herring as far as this issue or my posts are concerned, but good for you anyway.

Your passion may be admirable, but passion unconstrained by wisdom and the bounds of our own morality is a dangerous thing.

Gee, how very wise. Are you cautioning me against throwing a bomb at somebody, or something?

[quote
In short Jakers, if bombs are evil, then so too are rockets and we must find a policy that prevents either from being used.[/QUOTE]

Bombs and rockets are tools, nothing more, no9thing less. There is neither evil nor good in them. The morality of anything lies in the person who uses the tool, and the reasons why. Without EVIL political agenda, good men do not make themselves EVIL by dropping insensible, amoral bombs on women, children, and other civilians, under the pretext that they were 'human shields', or that it was only an accident, the 100th just like it this week.
 
Back
Top Bottom