Over 1,000 scientists sign declaration that there is no climate emergency

[Olddemocrat]

There are too many to name. Mostly M$Ms like CNN, MSNBC, etc. Any of them who takes a paper, and lies about what it really said.

That's all good and well, but I notice you did not include Fox in that list. Coincidence?
In any event, that is not where I get my information or news from.

 

[Lord of Planar]

Through out this thread I have said what I meant and meant what I said. I side with 70 years of serious climate studies and you, apparently, side with a spurious report of suspect origin. Why is that, I wonder?

How many of them have you actually read? It seems to me you haven't read any of them, and simply believe what the liars are telling you.

 

[longview]

Through out this thread I have said what I meant and meant what I said. I side with 70 years of serious climate studies and you, apparently, side with a spurious report of suspect origin. Why is that, I wonder?

You have not cited any of the peer reviewed studies you supposedly side with, how are we supposed to know what you meant?
Cite something that defines your position?

 

[Lord of Planar]

That's all good and well, but I notice you did not include Fox in that list. Coincidence?
In any event, that is not where I get my information or news from.

I don't know their take on AGW.

 

[CLAX1911]

Can't wait for the electric car worshipers to comment.

Electric car people are not into it for the environment in fact buying an electric car that's the equivalent of the gas-powered car is probably worse for the environment. Also keep in mind it's only the very expensive electric cars that are equivalent to the traditional counterpart.

For them it's about being sophisticated showing off how intelligent Superior they are.

The elevation to buy an electric car it's because you want one.

 

[CLAX1911]

Of course they're not climate scientists. Climate scientists working in the field would be publishing research papers in it, not signing dumbass stunt petitions designed to dupe people like the OP.

A commercial fisherman and a cardiologist. That's the authority the deniers are going to appeal to. Beyond pathetic but typical. After all, they think blogs that say what they want to hear have more weight than peer-reviewed research.

You use religious language in your arguments. Deniers? What are they denying your stupid Doomsday prophecy. That's not denial it's skepticism there is no reason to believe in whatever doomsday you think is coming everyone that ever believes that in the entirety of human history has been wrong.

So it's not denial it's actually intelligence

 

[Lord of Planar]

Electric car people are not into it for the environment in fact buying an electric car that's the equivalent of the gas-powered car is probably worse for the environment. Also keep in mind it's only the very expensive electric cars that are equivalent to the traditional counterpart.

For them it's about being sophisticated showing off how intelligent Superior they are.

The elevation to buy an electric car it's because you want one.

I want one, but it is so far behind other things on my list in priority. It makes no sense to buy one of them until the technology is better, unless it was kept for 50 years, as a classic.

My Camaro is a 97 SS Convertible with matching VIN SLP stickers. I couldn't pass it up when it was for sale. Got a great deal. Only 476 SLP Convertibles were made that year, and only 28 in silver and black with the six-speed. I wonder how many are still in almost like-new shape? I'll bet less that 20.

I could make a pretty penny from the right person wanting it. My two largest expenses were replacing the clutch, and fuel pump. Normal fail items. It runs great.

 

[CLAX1911]

I want one, but it is so far behind other things on my list in priority. It makes no sense to buy one of them until the technology is better, unless it was kept for 50 years, as a classic.

My Camaro is a 97 SS Convertible with matching VIN SLP stickers. I couldn't pass it up when it was for sale. Got a great deal. Only 476 SLP Convertibles were made that year, and only 28 in silver and black with the six-speed. I wonder how many are still in almost like-new shape? I'll bet less that 20.

I could make a pretty penny from the right person wanting it. My two largest expenses were replacing the clutch, and fuel pump. Normal fail items. It runs great.

Yeah I think it's good that they exist in that people want them and they get to buy them that's great diversity in the market is always good.

The only thing I've ever seen that's pretty common problem what does 4th gen Camaros is the rear main bearing. If you use the right oil make sure you change it and stay at a high water I don't think you can have a problem.

 

[Lord of Planar]

Yeah I think it's good that they exist in that people want them and they get to buy them that's great diversity in the market is always good.

The only thing I've ever seen that's pretty common problem what does 4th gen Camaros is the rear main bearing. If you use the right oil make sure you change it and stay at a high water I don't think you can have a problem.

I bought a new Z28 in April of 2000. It had that problem, and I had the shop fix it under warranty. My understanding is that it was just the first few years of the new LS1 engine with that issue. 1997 was the last year they used the tried and true, LT1.

 

[Olddemocrat]

You have not cited any of the peer reviewed studies you supposedly side with, how are we supposed to know what you meant?
Cite something that defines your position?

-Now you are just being silly and stupid. Side with your lonesome paper of tissue...I don't know what...Imma gonna stick with the mainstream smart people.

 

[Olddemocrat]

I don't know their take on AGW.

Really? Amazing! You have been outed, my friend.

 

[Lord of Planar]

Really? Amazing! You have been outed, my friend.

You sure do assume too much. I don't watch any news programs. I don't listen to news radio. I only have internet, cut my cable service more than a decade ago. I know of what CNN and the likes say about AGW, because those believing in it as a problem, are constantly posting such news links. I don't recall anyone posting Fox news links about AGW. I haven't looked.

Do you like talking out your ass? Assuming you outed me?

 

[Olddemocrat]

You sure do assume too much. I don't watch any news programs. I don't listen to news radio. I only have internet, cut my cable service more than a decade ago. I know of what CNN and the likes say about AGW, because those believing in it as a problem, are constantly posting such news links. I don't recall anyone posting Fox news links about AGW. I haven't looked.

Do you like talking out your ass? Assuming you outed me?

Oh, come on. You pretend to know all about M$M(what in the hell is that), CNN, NBC and one would assume others, as smart and informed as you are, and not be aware of Fox? You just lost credibility with just about every marginal critical thinker. That is such a bald faced lie!

 

[Lord of Planar]

Oh, come on. You pretend to know all about M$M(what in the hell is that), CNN, NBC and one would assume others, as smart and informed as you are, and not be aware of Fox? You just lost credibility with just about every marginal critical thinker. That is such a bald faced lie!

LOL....

You're losing it.

 

[Glitch]

I want one, but it is so far behind other things on my list in priority. It makes no sense to buy one of them until the technology is better, unless it was kept for 50 years, as a classic.

My Camaro is a 97 SS Convertible with matching VIN SLP stickers. I couldn't pass it up when it was for sale. Got a great deal. Only 476 SLP Convertibles were made that year, and only 28 in silver and black with the six-speed. I wonder how many are still in almost like-new shape? I'll bet less that 20.

I could make a pretty penny from the right person wanting it. My two largest expenses were replacing the clutch, and fuel pump. Normal fail items. It runs great.

I want a nuclear-powered vehicle, but I'm not holding my breath. Until that happens I will settle for the most practical and cost-effective vehicle I can afford for my environment. Which turned out to be two vehicles in my particular case. The one I drive most often is a Toyota Corolla sedan. However, when there is more than a foot of freshly fallen snow on the ground the only way I can get to the highway is by using my 4x4 Nissan pick-up. Even then I some times have to wait until the snow gets compacted down by snow machines.

I don't use the pick-up often because it only gets 10 mpg, but I do use it every 6 to 8 weeks when I take my household trash to the landfill. The good news is that it is an 1987 Nissan pick-up. Which means that it has no computers.

An electric vehicle would be a detriment in my environment.

 

[Glitch]

You sure do assume too much. I don't watch any news programs. I don't listen to news radio. I only have internet, cut my cable service more than a decade ago. I know of what CNN and the likes say about AGW, because those believing in it as a problem, are constantly posting such news links. I don't recall anyone posting Fox news links about AGW. I haven't looked.

Do you like talking out your ass? Assuming you outed me?

I can't get cable where I'm located. I did have a satellite service with Dish Network for a couple years from 2004 until 2006. However, when I couldn't get more than 20 days of decent service out of every 30 they provided, I cancelled my subscription. They told me I needed a 3 meter dish. I told them to get screwed. I haven't had any cable or TV services since 2006, and I don't miss it.

Since the late 1990s I have been getting my news from:

Online Newspapers: World Directory

An extensive directory of Online Newspapers from every country of the world provided to you by OnlineNewspapers.com

onlinenewspapers.com

 

[Olddemocrat]

LOL....

You're losing it.

Nope! Just found it!

 

[Olddemocrat]

Can you point to something in the declaration that is incorrect?
Why do you refuse to support your position?
At least cite one of those scientist you claim exists.

You mean other that the fact that it is a climate denier web site? Funded by a climate denier organization? Not really but then I shouldn't have to, should I? Falls neatly into post #566

 

[Olddemocrat]

How many of them have you actually read? It seems to me you haven't read any of them, and simply believe what the liars are telling you.

You are citing a report from an unabashedly denier web site, funded by a denier organization, and you expect people to take it seriously? People that are alive? People who can think, and possess critical thinking skills? Do you truly understand how silly, and sad, and foolish, and pathetic that makes you look? I have read a number of your posts, and other than this subject, you seem to be fairly intelligent and well informed. Just not on climate. I am curious as to how and why you have gone so far off of the rails.

 

[Olddemocrat]

You have not cited any of the peer reviewed studies you supposedly side with, how are we supposed to know what you meant?
Cite something that defines your position?

You really take this seriously? Really? I don't. That silly list is from and was created by an unashamedly proselytizing denier web site and you expect me to take it seriously? If I have not already done so, I would refer you to post #566.

 

[longview]

You really take this seriously? Really? I don't. That silly list is from and was created by an unashamedly proselytizing denier web site and you expect me to take it seriously? If I have not already done so, I would refer you to post #566.

It bears quoting you empty platitudes from post #566

These things pop up from time to time from God only knows where. There is scarcely a single serious scientist or journalist who doesn't look at this and just cringe. Anyone with the most rudimentary critical thinking skills immediately recognizes it for what it is, namely, a towering pile of stinking, fetid BS. And yet, here come the mindless thundering horde rushing in to defend this aforementioned pile as some divine truth known only to them. It would be vastly amusing if only it wasn't so sad.

Also worth noting, that you still have not supported your position!

 

[Lord of Planar]

I want a nuclear-powered vehicle, but I'm not holding my breath. Until that happens I will settle for the most practical and cost-effective vehicle I can afford for my environment. Which turned out to be two vehicles in my particular case. The one I drive most often is a Toyota Corolla sedan. However, when there is more than a foot of freshly fallen snow on the ground the only way I can get to the highway is by using my 4x4 Nissan pick-up. Even then I some times have to wait until the snow gets compacted down by snow machines.

I don't use the pick-up often because it only gets 10 mpg, but I do use it every 6 to 8 weeks when I take my household trash to the landfill. The good news is that it is an 1987 Nissan pick-up. Which means that it has no computers.

An electric vehicle would be a detriment in my environment.

Yes, an electric isn't practrical, especially for an ebvironment that gets as cold as it does where you live. The Cycber Truck may be useful for the snow, if it had the range you need in the cold. At least Tesla has a way of the batteries warming themselves before starting. Still, the cost would be impractical for most beyond vanity.

 

[Lord of Planar]

You are citing a report from an unabashedly denier web site, funded by a denier organization, and you expect people to take it seriously? People that are alive? People who can think, and possess critical thinking skills? Do you truly understand how silly, and sad, and foolish, and pathetic that makes you look? I have read a number of your posts, and other than this subject, you seem to be fairly intelligent and well informed. Just not on climate. I am curious as to how and why you have gone so far off of the rails.

You like you logical fallacies to go by.

You have no merit in your words.

 

[Olddemocrat]

They all have their "theories" and "questions" (loaded) and can't seem to "think" beyond

It bears quoting you empty platitudes from post #566

Also worth noting, that you still have not supported your position!

Against that obvious pile of stinking, fetid, smelly crap? Nah, you can embrace it and roll around in it. As for me, no thanks.

 

[longview]

Against that obvious pile of stinking, fetid, smelly crap? Nah, you can embrace it and roll around in it. As for me, no thanks.

More empty platitudes, have you got anything that actually supports your position?