• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Out-of-office messages blaming Democrats for shutdown sent on behalf of some federal workers without their consent

We did? What elections have stopped being held? Votes no longer taken or counted? Offices changes personnel with the newly elected?
When the government can use public websites and voice mail systems to make partisan speech that blames one political party, that will sway voters.
 
There are already lawsuits about this, but it's tricky. Compelled speech is illegal, but if the employees are seen as speaking for the government, then Trump will likely win.
You actually think it’s a “tricky” issue when the government attributes statements to individuals that could very well cause them legal issues.
It’s not tricky at all… it’s F****** illegal!!
 
We did? What elections have stopped being held? Votes no longer taken or counted? Offices changes personnel with the newly elected?
I see you are new. What you will find is a pattern and practice of the far left liberals here, who dominate this forum, to puppet what their tribal Chieftains yell and scream out on CNN, MSNBS and other TV stations operated on behalf of the Democrats spew out on a daily basis. When they hear a tribal leader say stupid crap like "Trump will not give up power in 2028" the posters here run with that as if it was some priestly utterance at mass. And in order to deflect away from them, the tribal chieftains will call their favorite propaganda stations and get hour long interviews to tell their tribal members they must be in FEAR of ___________________ (fill in the blanks)

So, these posters hear that sort of garbage on TV, don't bother to research it, and just parrot what they heard, like the advertisement of "As seen on TV".

Worse yet, they will see a clickbait headline and hurriedly slap it up as if everything in the article they didn't read must be true because some dope TV anchor or alleged reporter who has zero training in investigative journalism said it or wrote it.
 
When the government can use public websites and voice mail systems to make partisan speech that blames one political party, that will sway voters.
you mean the 10 people that actually read govt email responses LOL
 
You got that backwards. The government is speaking for the employees — and worse, in a one sided partisan manner.
The former vegetable-in-chief would never do such a thing, would he?
 
So voting doesn't count? The voice of the people are ignored?
I mean, essentially he is saying that elections don't matter.
No he's saying find some other corrupt POS to elect/appoint he's corrupt and erecting the middle finger to someone by proxy............welcome to politics its all in the game
 
Mike Johnson refuses to swear in a newly elected Congresswoman.
Why?
Because the minute he does there will be a vote forced on releasing the Epstein files. And his boss, for some reason, doesn’t want that even though doing that was one of his biggest applause lines/lies during the campaign.
 
Employees has complained on social media that their automatic replies had been changed, without their consent, to one containing an explicit criticism of the Democrats. Don't you have laws? Departments are supposed to be non-political in a democracy... Do you have democracy?


"One employee said they went into their email system twice over the last 24 hours to change the automatic message to a generic one, but it was reverted back to the message blaming Democrats."

Republicans: Finding new dirty ways to make government partisan.
 
No he's sayi9ng find some ohter corrupt POS to elect or he's corrupt and erecting the middle finger to someone by proxy............welcome to politics its all in the game
No, he is.
A person was elected BY THE PEOPLE to represent them.
Mike Johnson is saying "I refuse to accept democracy and am ignoring the votes and the voice of the people."

Why do MAGA support ignoring democracy, voting, and the voice of the people?
 
Because the minute he does there will be a vote forced on releasing the Epstein files. And his boss, for some reason, doesn’t want that even though doing that was one of his biggest applause lines/lies during the campaign.
I know why.
Johnson is a testicle free loser who is willfully ignoring democracy. Those people deserve representation. Its in the constitution. And he's ignoring that.
He is a piece of shit.
 
Employees has complained on social media that their automatic replies had been changed, without their consent, to one containing an explicit criticism of the Democrats. Don't you have laws? Departments are supposed to be non-political in a democracy... Do you have democracy?


"One employee said they went into their email system twice over the last 24 hours to change the automatic message to a generic one, but it was reverted back to the message blaming Democrats."
LOL. Nothing is non political.
 
Wrong. It is NOT his right or duty to keep the people from her district in Arizona from having their representation in the House.
That poster is fine with not following the constitution.
To MAGA, the constitution is just some old piece of paper.
 
No he's saying find some other corrupt POS to elect/appoint he's corrupt and erecting the middle finger to someone by proxy............welcome to politics it’s all in the game
Not his choice. He is not a voter from that district in Arizona.
 
No he's saying find some other corrupt POS to elect/appoint he's corrupt and erecting the middle finger to someone by proxy............welcome to politics its all in the game
So you hate the very idea of elections.
 
Wrong. It is NOT his right or duty to keep the people from her district in Arizona from having their representation in the House.
According to Congressional procedure it is.
 
Back
Top Bottom