• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Oregon one of the worst states for retirement, WalletHub says

Moon

Why so serious?
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
20,799
Reaction score
13,115
Location
Washington State
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Oregon is the 39th worst U.S. state for retirement, according to a new WalletHub study.

The 11 states that ranked worse for retirees are Indiana, Hawaii, Arkansas, West Virginia, Rhode Island, New Jersey, New Mexico, Washington, Mississippi, Louisiana and Kentucky, the personal finance website said.

<snip>

WalletHub’s top 10 state for retirement:​

  1. Floria
  2. Minnesota
  3. Colorado
  4. Wyoming
  5. South Dakota
  6. Pennsylvania
  7. New Hampshire
  8. Delaware
  9. North Dakota
  10. Wisconsin

As a resident of Washington, I’m not surprised my state made the “worst” list. It keeps getting more and more expensive to live here and won’t improve once I stop working.
 
If Washington State is so bad, then why do people keep moving there?
It’s a beautiful state, so it’s understandable why people want to come here, plus jobs with Boeing, Amazon, etc. Doesn’t change the fact that it’s expensive which makes it costly to retire here.
 
It’s a beautiful state, so it’s understandable why people want to come here, plus jobs with Boeing, Amazon, etc. Doesn’t change the fact that it’s expensive which makes it costly to retire here.

And yet you're still there.
 
If Washington State is so bad, then why do people keep moving there?

It does seem to offer some perks for retirees (like no income tax), especially in smaller towns in the eastern (less rainy and expensive) part of the state.
 
The article says Oregon is the 39th worst state to retire in. That means only ten state are better than Oregon to retire in. That's pretty damned good.

There should be a penalty for people who don't read the OP they post.
 
The article says Oregon is the 39 worst state to retire in. That mean only ten state are better than Oregon to retire in. That's prett damned good.

There should be a penalty for people who don't read the OP they post.
You’re reading that backwards.
 
No, they're two separate states.
Then why does the thread title talk about Oregon and you mention Washington?
 
Then why does the thread title talk about Oregon and you mention Washington?
The article was written in Portland Oregon. I live in Washington. Washington ranked worse than Oregon.
 
I’m surprised that South Dakota made the top 10 (best) for retirement states and that Texas didn’t.
Florida ranked #1, but I wouldn’t want to live there. Also surprised Texas didn’t make the list.
 
Interesting how there ends up being so little political correlation in lists like these.

4 red states, 4 blue states, and 2 swing states in the top 10. 5 red states and 5 blue states in the bottom 10.
 
I never understood people who moved far away from their families to retire - unless they have already decided that their kids will be more trouble than they are worth once the problems of aging and the inevitable physical and cognitive decline that comes with it. Personally, I want my family near by.
 
I never understood people who moved far away from their families to retire - unless they have already decided that their kids will be more trouble than they are worth once the problems of aging and the inevitable physical and cognitive decline that comes with it. Personally, I want my family near by.
That’s certainly a consideration as well.
 
It’s a beautiful state, so it’s understandable why people want to come here, plus jobs with Boeing, Amazon, etc. Doesn’t change the fact that it’s expensive which makes it costly to retire here.
I'm starting to think that is just about everywhere except some of the dirt poor southern states.
 
I’m surprised that South and North Dakota made the top 10 (best) for retirement states and that Texas didn’t.
The major cities in Texas have also become very expensive. Aside from that, I'll agree that it's a great place to live.
 
Interesting how there ends up being so little political correlation in lists like these.

4 red states, 4 blue states, and 2 swing states in the top 10. 5 red states and 5 blue states in the bottom 10.

Makes you think it was massaged.
 
The major cities in Texas have also become very expensive. Aside from that, I'll agree that it's a great place to live.

Major cities almost everywhere are more expensive, but we live inexpensively (on our SS retirement incomes) about 25 miles SSE of Austin, Texas.
 
Major cities almost everywhere are more expensive, but we live inexpensively (on our SS retirement incomes) about 25 miles SSE of Austin, Texas.
Dripping Springs area? I have friends that live there.

Dallas is ridiculously expensive these days. We moved here 18 years ago and probably couldn't afford it now.
 
Back
Top Bottom