And Westboro Baptists are clearly connected to Christianity. Right?
NAMBLA is pedophiles.
There are straight pedophiles. In fact most pedophiles are straight.
Therefore straight marriage is far more a threat to unleashing social acceptance of pedophilia than same-sex marriage.
YOU FAIL on every level.
Stop associating same-sex marriage with NAMBLA and therefore trying to link same-sex marriage with socially acceptable pedophilia.
Straight people pose far more danger to children than gay people do. Now that's FACT.
People who support gay marriage need to understand that when marriage is redefined in LAW it lays the foundation for all different types of sexual orientations to be pursued in the name of Civil Rights and that their practices be recognized lawful. Since morality in a religious sense can't be used as an argument against gay marriage, it can not be used in relationships like what NAMBLA promotes either. Nor can it be used as an argument against incest relationships. In other words because of changing the definition of marriage and all the discrimination laws associated with it has open the door for all sexual orientations to have rights. Some of them you may not be willing to support just like those today who do not support gay marriage but because of the discrimination laws being written today over gay marriage and sexual orientation, you will be forced to. And just like you are not willing to respect the religious conscience of those who deny services over gay marriage claiming them to be discrimination, some day down the road when you can no longer support something, you too will be charged with discrimination and because you were unable to stand up for the rights of conscience of others, will be denied your rights.
Let the buyer beware.
You can call it a slippery slope logical fallacy all you want, but in LAW it has legs.
How come interracial marriage didn't open the doors for pedophilia?
Anybody around here support the NAMBLA agenda ?
I always laugh when i see this dishonest, illogical, inane argument, its always a complete strawman and failure. Does anybody ever fall for it?
reminds me of all the failed arguments people had in the past for equal rights for women and minorities and interracial marriage. THey were stupid and failed arguments then and that remains true today.
The stupid and failed argument is one where a person can not differentiate interracial marriages between a man and a woman and the redefining of marriage to include same sex. A stupid and failed argument is from a person that believes discrimination laws should be allowed to trump the right of conscience of others in the name of equality. A stupid and failed argument is one which denies the consequences to come from the laws and opinions being written on defining discrimination today.
The stupid and failed argument is one where a person can not differentiate interracial marriages between a man and a woman and the redefining of marriage to include same sex. A stupid and failed argument is from a person that believes discrimination laws should be allowed to trump the right of conscience of others in the name of equality. A stupid and failed argument is one which denies the consequences to come from the laws and opinions being written on defining discrimination today.
Anybody around here support the NAMBLA agenda ?
Well anybody?
at lest you admit its stupid and failed, the other fact you arent admitting is that your examples are factually difference
if you disagree PLEASE PLEASE provide FACTS that make the precedence for equal rights for gays lend itself solely to pedophile marriage? we cant wait to read this fail for further entertainment.
I never stated that. I stated that Nambla defines itself as a civil rights activist group from the beginning had ties with the founder of the first gay rights activist group ever formed in this country. That is a fact that can not be denied.
Redefining marriage has consequences. With traditional marriage no longer the standard, who knows what it will evolve into meaning. Marriage has the potential to now become whatever someone wants it to be. And the new laws being passed are laying the foundation for it to occur not tomorrow but years down the road.
1,)I never stated that. I stated that Nambla defines itself as a civil rights activist group from the beginning had ties with the founder of the first gay rights activist group ever formed in this country. That is a fact that can not be denied.
2.)Redefining marriage has consequences.
3.) With traditional marriage no longer the standard
4.) who knows what it will evolve into meaning.
5.) Marriage has the potential to now become whatever someone wants it to be. And the new laws being passed are laying the foundation for it to occur not tomorrow but years down the road.
Anybody around here support the NAMBLA agenda ?
Redefining marriage has consequences. With traditional marriage no longer the standard, who knows what it will evolve into meaning. Marriage has the potential to now become whatever someone wants it to be. And the new laws being passed are laying the foundation for it to occur not tomorrow but years down the road.
thats what i thought you got nothnig and YES your statement implies they are the same, good back pedal
1.) yeah so what KKK also founded its self the same way and had ties with churches? whats that mean?
oh thats right, NOTHING
2.) nobody is redefining marriage Gay marriage exists in BC and what are these fantasy strawman consequences.
3.) what is traditional marriage, it never was the standard depending on who you ask its a made up thing
4.) equal rights is the only think evolving
5.) no it factually does not
6.) there is ZERO foundation being laid except ending discrimination and granting equality. All good things.
like your presented argument is a complete failure and history, facts and reality proves it to be a stupid argument also.
This argument sounds dishonest. You don't really believe people don't know the difference between interracial and SSM right? You both know the difference, except it only bothers you. It doesn't bother most people because it doesn't affect them. Why does it affect you?The stupid and failed argument is one where a person can not differentiate interracial marriages between a man and a woman and the redefining of marriage to include same sex. A stupid and failed argument is from a person that believes discrimination laws should be allowed to trump the right of conscience of others in the name of equality. A stupid and failed argument is one which denies the consequences to come from the laws and opinions being written on defining discrimination today.
man/boy relationships were quite popular in ancient Greece and Rome. Young male prostitutes in the Edo period of Japan were called kagema. Their clients were mainly adult men.
In southern areas of Central Asia and Afghanistan adolescent males between twelve and sixteen years old perform erotic songs and suggestive dancing and are available as sex workers. Such boys are known as bacchá.
In India, a hijra is a physically male or intersex person who may sometimes enter into prostitution. Not all hijras are prostitutes, however, and many consider themselves to have a female identity in a male body and accept this as a sacred condition or gift. Hijras dress as women and dance at weddings.
Nothing new under the sun.....who knows maybe these practices will become the new norm in this country some day.
man/boy relationships were quite popular in ancient Greece and Rome. Young male prostitutes in the Edo period of Japan were called kagema. Their clients were mainly adult men.
In southern areas of Central Asia and Afghanistan adolescent males between twelve and sixteen years old perform erotic songs and suggestive dancing and are available as sex workers. Such boys are known as bacchá.
In India, a hijra is a physically male or intersex person who may sometimes enter into prostitution. Not all hijras are prostitutes, however, and many consider themselves to have a female identity in a male body and accept this as a sacred condition or gift. Hijras dress as women and dance at weddings.
Nothing new under the sun.....who knows maybe these practices will become the new norm in this country some day.
1.) man/boy relationships were quite popular in ancient Greece and Rome. Young male prostitutes in the Edo period of Japan were called kagema. Their clients were mainly adult men.
2.) In southern areas of Central Asia and Afghanistan adolescent males between twelve and sixteen years old perform erotic songs and suggestive dancing and are available as sex workers. Such boys are known as bacchá.
In India, a hijra is a physically male or intersex person who may sometimes enter into prostitution. Not all hijras are prostitutes, however, and many consider themselves to have a female identity in a male body and accept this as a sacred condition or gift. Hijras dress as women and dance at weddings.
Nothing new under the sun.....who knows maybe these practices will become the new norm in this country some day.
I get tired of the Association Fallacy.
1. NAMBLA is a homosexual organization.
2. NAMBLA wants to legalize adults having sex with minors.
3. Therefore, all homosexuals want to legalize adults having sex with minors.
That is the crux of the logic. Anyone who cannot see how that is fallacious or baiting is probably not worth trying to convince otherwise.
man/boy relationships were quite popular in ancient Greece and Rome. Young male prostitutes in the Edo period of Japan were called kagema. Their clients were mainly adult men.
In southern areas of Central Asia and Afghanistan adolescent males between twelve and sixteen years old perform erotic songs and suggestive dancing and are available as sex workers. Such boys are known as bacchá.
In India, a hijra is a physically male or intersex person who may sometimes enter into prostitution. Not all hijras are prostitutes, however, and many consider themselves to have a female identity in a male body and accept this as a sacred condition or gift. Hijras dress as women and dance at weddings.
Nothing new under the sun.....who knows maybe these practices will become the new norm in this country some day.
oh ****
wait a minute
i have a mustache
Hitler has a mustache
oh no, i must be Hitler!!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?