Oklahoma teacher’s certificate revoked over largely unenforceable law (1 Viewer)

[ColdHardTruth]

The criminals in the government of Oklahoma willingly violated the law and illegally revoked a teacher's teaching credentials.

This is going to court. Oklahoma is going to lose and it's going to cost them money.

It's time for the coward governor of Jokelahoma to fire Ryan Walters and disband the Nazi board he ran.

MSN

 

[Hamish Howl]

So great. She can move to a state that isn't trying to be 1950s Mississippi and teach there.

I would encourage teachers in other backwards-ass states to do the same if they can.

 

[Integrityrespec]

Is there actually a story here somewhere?

 

[Grand Mal]

Is there actually a story here somewhere?

You might want to click the link and read it.
Or not.

 

[Loulit01]

Is there actually a story here somewhere?

None you can find without reading.

 

[VySky]

The criminals in the government of Oklahoma willingly violated the law and illegally revoked a teacher's teaching credentials.

This is going to court. Oklahoma is going to lose and it's going to cost them money.

It's time for the coward governor of Jokelahoma to fire Ryan Walters and disband the Nazi board he ran.

MSN

Looks like the law was enforced. '


Oklahoma teacher’s certificate revoked

 

[BirdinHand]

So great. She can move to a state that isn't trying to be 1950s Mississippi and teach there.

I would encourage teachers in other backwards-ass states to do the same if they can.

Yep.

 

[ColdHardTruth]

Looks like the law was enforced. '


Oklahoma teacher’s certificate revoked

No, that law was deemed unenforceable by a federal court. Oklahoma new that and used it anyway.

The state's officials countermanded the order of a federal judge. They WILL pay for what they did.

Defending them is a bad look.

 

[Loulit01]

No, that law was deemed unenforceable by a federal court. Oklahoma new that and used it anyway.

The state's officials countermanded the order of a federal judge. They WILL pay for what they did.

Defending them is a bad look.

You'd have to read the OP to know that.

 

[Helix]

So great. She can move to a state that isn't trying to be 1950s Mississippi and teach there.

I would encourage teachers in other backwards-ass states to do the same if they can.

It's very difficult to do that even if one isn't living on a teacher's salary.

 

[element94]

None you can find without reading.

But there would also need to be understanding.

 

[ColdHardTruth]

You'd have to read the OP to know that.

Indeed... and exactly my point.

Jokelahoma violated the orders of a federal court, and they must be held in contempt. Every last member of that board needs to spend 30 days in jail.

 

[Hamish Howl]

It's very difficult to do that even if one isn't living on a teacher's salary.

I'm aware.

But what has she got there? No more career and surrounded by knuckle-dragging flyovers.

 

[Helix]

I'm aware.

But what has she got there? No more career and surrounded by knuckle-dragging flyovers.

Could be family, and probably little means to pull up roots and buy a place to live in a blue state. You also have to remember that right to work for less states pay lower wages, which can make it difficult to save enough to get the **** out of them.

 

[Buckeyes85]

I read the story, and frankly can't understand what is being alleged/argued.
What specifically did she allegedly due that purportedly violated what specific portion of the statute?
Perhaps their revocation was intentionally vague as to those details? Can't rule it was in violation of the injunction if they can't figure out what the decision was actually based on?

I did like the part of gratuitously throwing in "nothing in this decision relies upon parts of the statute that a federal judge has ruled cannot be enforced at present." As if everyone would just say- Ok, we know they weren't relying upon any unenforceable parts of the statute- because they said so!

 

[ColdHardTruth]

I read the story, and frankly can't understand what is being alleged/argued.
What specifically did she allegedly due that purportedly violated what specific portion of the statute?
Perhaps their revocation was intentionally vague as to those details? Can't rule it was in violation of the injunction if they can't figure out what the decision was actually based on?

I did like the part of gratuitously throwing in "nothing in this decision relies upon parts of the statute that a federal judge has ruled cannot be enforced at present." As if everyone would just say- Ok, we know they weren't relying upon any unenforceable parts of the statute- because they said so!

Specifically, a federal judge ruled the law used in that case unenforceable. This means, as a matter of case law, the state is prohibited from going anywhere near enforcement of that law. In this case, the knuckle-dragging republican morons in the government of that state, including the scumbag who tried to force religion into schools, use a law suspend by a judge, to strip a teacher of her license.

This needs to cost Oklahoma 10 figures and it should cost everybody on that board their jobs and their professional licensure, the pensions, and their benefits.

 

[Hamish Howl]

Is there actually a story here somewhere?

Yes.

"Idiotic right wing proto-Nazis ruin woman's life."

Not that I expect that to bother you.