• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ohio Supreme Court sets aside ban on transgender medical care for teens.

Lisa

salem ac leporem,
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 3, 2019
Messages
48,568
Reaction score
41,882
Location
Ohio
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Progressive
Maybe now Mike DeWine, Dave Yost, and the Ohio GOP will leave medical care decisions in the hands of patients and providers, where they belong.

COLUMBUS- In a victory for transgender Ohioans and their families, the Supreme Court of Ohio has rejected a request by the state to narrow a temporary restraining order granted by a lower court blocking the state from enforcing its ban on gender-affirming medical care for trans youth.


On Wednesday, April 24, the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Ohio, and the global law firm Goodwin Procter filed a motion to intervene in the mandamus case, Yost v. Judge Holbrook. The legal organizations, representing two Ohio families whose children are at risk of losing critical life-saving medical care, urged the Ohio Supreme Court to deny the state’s emergency request that Judge Holbrook, of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, drastically narrow the scope of the temporary injunction he placed on House Bill 68.

The TRO, issued on April 16, blocks the ban on gender-affirming care for transgender youth and the ban on transgender girls and women participating on girls or women’s sports teams from taking immediate effect. In his emergency mandamus motion, Attorney General Yost claimed that the trial court lacked authority to enjoin enforcement of the constitutionally suspect statute.

Today’s decision by the court denies the state’s effort to narrow the scope of the TRO, and allows the case to proceed in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, where a trial is currently scheduled for July 15.

“This decision was correct. The state’s request was egregious. The scope of the temporary restraining order was necessary and appropriate to prevent the constitutional violations and other irreparable harm that would immediately occur if HB 68 were permitted to take effect. Our legal battle will continue until this cruel restriction is permanently overturned,” added Freda Levenson, Legal Director at the ACLU of Ohio.

“The state’s claim that this was an ‘emergency’ because it could not enforce an unconstitutional statute was utterly absurd. Far from creating an emergency, the challenged temporary injunction merely maintains the status quo in Ohio – that trans youth be permitted to access life-saving medical care with support from parents and doctors. We’re thankful the court did not allow the state to subvert the rights of trans youth and their families” said Harper Seldin, Senior Staff Attorney, American Civil Liberties Union.

 
giphy.gif


I'm glad the OHIO Government didn't succeed in taking children or women's medial care away this year!! (y)
 
Maybe now Mike DeWine, Dave Yost, and the Ohio GOP will leave medical care decisions in the hands of patients and providers, where they belong.

In all fairness, IIRC Mike Dewine had vetoed this bill. Which was then overridden by Ohios Trumptard GQP legislature.
 
Maybe now Mike DeWine, Dave Yost, and the Ohio GOP will leave medical care decisions in the hands of patients and providers, where they belong.
Good news. (On a personal level, now I don't have to worry about our out-of-state transgender grandkids, who are due to travel to the Buckeye state in the near future.)

DeWine did veto the bill, but the GOPer assholes overrode it:


...Republican lawmakers passed House Bill 68 last year as the "Ohio Saving Adolescents from Experimentation Act," to block gender-transition treatments for minors and to ban trans athletes from participating in K-12 and collegiate girls and women's sports.

It was vetoed by Gov. Mike DeWine, who said going forward with gender-affirming treatments are "gut-wrenching decisions that should be made by parents" and informed by doctors and medical professionals. Republican lawmakers overrode his veto, with one saying that "there is no such thing as gender-affirming care."...
 
giphy.gif


I'm glad the OHIO Government didn't succeed in taking children or women's medial care away this year!! (y)

When "childrens medical care" involves unnecessary castration, there are questions that probably should be asked IMO. Personally in this matter I am fine with deferring to a body like the AMA and not go with what politicians say.
 
When "childrens medical care" involves unnecessary castration, there are questions that probably should be asked IMO. Personally in this matter I am fine with deferring to a body like the AMA and not go with what politicians say.
I believe you have to be 18 for sex realignment surgery. Regardless, I assume all those questions were presented.
 
When "childrens medical care" involves unnecessary castration, there are questions that probably should be asked IMO. Personally in this matter I am fine with deferring to a body like the AMA and not go with what politicians say.
The AMA, pediatricians, psychologists and psychiatrists supports gender affirming care for teens and adults.

The chemical and then surgical castration is a very welcome part of transgender care if someone chooses to transition. They cannot effectively transition to the body that aligns with their gender identity without stopping/blocking/removing the hormones that their body naturally creates.


 
Last edited:
In all fairness, IIRC Mike Dewine had vetoed this bill. Which was then overridden by Ohios Trumptard GQP legislature.

Ahem

 
The AMA, pediatricians, psychologists and psychiatrists supports gender affirming care for teens and adults.

The chemical and then surgical castration is a very welcome part of transgender care if someone chooses to transition. They cannot effectively transition to the body that aligns with their gender idneity without stopping/blocking/removing the hormones that their body nature creates.



What if I identify as a double amputee?

Should a doctor lop my arms off for me if thats what I want?
 
What if I identify as a double amputee?

Should a doctor lop my arms off for me if thats what I want?
How do you identify as a double amputee? Would that be a male or female double amputee?

I'd see a psychologist for a diagnosis and then they can help you work on a treatment plan.
 
What if I identify as a double amputee?

Should a doctor lop my arms off for me if thats what I want?
This isn't - or, at least, at some time in the past, wasn't - so far out as some might think.

I've read about this, although it's been a number of years, possibly pre-pandemic.
 
What if I identify as a double amputee?

Should a doctor lop my arms off for me if thats what I want?
They might, but you could definitely get your kids a nose job, and or a boob job so they fit in at school with little trouble. Plastic surgery is common among teens in our country, people don't even bat an eye.

They bat an eye at this because they've been told to dislike queers. It's political.
 
How do you identify as a double amputee? Would that be a male or female double amputee?

I'd see a psychologist for a diagnosis and then they can help you work on a treatment plan.

OK*
 
We’re debating whether surgically or chemically castrating confused teens is a good idea.

The world gets dumber by the day.
 
They might, but you could definitely get your kids a nose job, and or a boob job so they fit in at school with little trouble. Plastic surgery is common among teens in our country, people don't even bat an eye.

I'm not so sure that nobody batted an eye as you say.

Anyone that allows their minor child to get a boob job and plastic surgery should be relieved of their children and imprisoned IMHO. Now of course a necessity is a different story such as to fix a deformity or disfigurement etc.

They bat an eye at this because they've been told to dislike queers.

Uh huh. I remember being told that. I was told to dislike queers, and so I did. I do as I'm told. :rolleyes:
 
We’re debating whether surgically or chemically castrating confused teens is a good idea.

The world gets dumber by the day.
"Confused" is your layman's opinion.

Counseling and social transitioning are among the steps transgenders take prior to surgery.
 
We’re debating whether surgically or chemically castrating confused teens is a good idea.

The world gets dumber by the day.
This treatment protocol is what has been proved the most effective for both transgender adults and teens for the past 50+ years. Denying effective transgender care has deadly effects, even when they do survive suicide attempts because of the depression and dysphoria.

Where did you get your medical or psych graduate degree? Dazzle me with your brilliance if you know so much more.
 
Last edited:
I'm not so sure that nobody batted an eye as you say.

Anyone that allows their minor child to get a boob job and plastic surgery should be relieved of their children and imprisoned IMHO. Now of course a necessity is a different story such as to fix a deformity or disfigurement etc.



Uh huh. I remember being told that. I was told to dislike queers, and so I did. I do as I'm told. :rolleyes:
You weren't and I know that, but "you" know MAGAs are. You're not that foolish. If you want to jump on this train, you're now taking the ride.

We've had this talk before, and while I admire that you think all plastic surgery should be kept in the adult atmosphere, something I might agree on, fighting along side of the prejudice discriminating Christian Right on this issue isn't going to save you from judgement.

Start a thread on plastic surgery and youth, from a health perspective. This isn't that thread. This is a political agenda against transgenders. This isn't the only law purposed by Christian cons against this community, and it won't be the last.
 
Heres how utterly despicable the Ohio GOP is (well most of them). When i called the guy sponsoring the ectopic pregnancy bill and told him several OBGYN professionals are saying this is not only impossible but deadly, the ****head little snake said hes got professionals that say its possible, guess who he pointed me to?

Some guy who tried to but failed 100 years ago! These people are utter demons.
 
Heres how utterly despicable the Ohio GOP is (well most of them). When i called the guy sponsoring the ectopic pregnancy bill and told him several OBGYN professionals are saying this is not only impossible but deadly, the ****head little snake said hes got professionals that say its possible, guess who he pointed me to?

Some guy who tried to but failed 100 years ago! These people are utter demons.
Good Gawd!! That's horrid!! My brain curdles thinking about these dudes in charge of my health. :eek:
 
Like im far from a professional when it comes to female reproductive systems, i dont have any experience with them. Ya know what i dont do? I dont use my ignorance to immiserate the lives of women like the guy i spoke to wants to do. That displays not only a severe lack of maturity but also an almost demonic lack of empathy.
 
Back
Top Bottom