There is no other reason people would think it is remotely possible to know who won Texas son election night. Obviously no Electoral College map shows Texas as a navy state; they are either tossup, pink, or light blue. So there is no way to know who won without all of the ballots being counted, which is mathematically impossible in just four hours.
I hear you but several things come to mind. If early voting is a proxy for turnout, this is good for Dems. Also, early voting over a two-week period limits lines. Wouldn't it be a table-turner, if the GOP has long lines on Nov 4, the way they used to suppress the vote in black neighborhoods by causing long lines?It's probably not a great idea to get too excited about early voter turnout because Republicans are just going to make up a lot of the difference on election day. I can certainly understand the temptation though because of the conventional wisdom that high voter turnout is usually good for Democrats.
I'm a big AZ Cardinals fan. I certainly enjoyed the beatdown the cowgirls received on Monday night.Yeah, but the Cowboys still suck!!
Actually, Texas does count mail in/absentee ballots the week before election day. They start tabulating early in person votes on Election Day afternoon. All this to say, we could have a pretty good idea how Texas voted by late in the evening. If, huge if, Texas were to record say 9 million votes for Biden early, that would be it. Texas has about 17 million registered voters and is a winner take all state. Not predicting that it will happen but it could.
I take it there is no concern about mail-in ballots changing the way others will vote in 13 days? My mom told me for that reason, our ballots cannot be counted until after all polls close on November 3 even though we voted on September 29.
This still does not change the state's current tossup status. It would have to a blowout for either candidate to hear he won Texas shortly after all the polls close.
I hope there won't be any substantial issue of fraud. I hope that you're correct and that we'll know on election night who won. I expect, irrespective of who wins and because of what contentious, poor-sport crybabies we seem to have become, that whichever side loses will demand a recount, sigh.
I hope not either; we need to retain some kind of confidence in our system of governance. What I find asking myself every time Trump bashes mail in voting is "well, you're the president, so what are you doing about that?". I don't expect the president himself to solve it, but surely more could have worked with those who can to ensure voters can trust the mail in voting process rather than have the president cast all sorts of doubts about it.
They could have long lines in Texas on Election Day. I believe Republicans changed the ballots so you can no longer vote a straight ticket. That makes voting take longer because you have to vote each race individually so the lines could be longer. Apparently they thought Beto got close to taking down Cruz because too many people voted a straight Democrat ballot.I hear you but several things come to mind. If early voting is a proxy for turnout, this is good for Dems. Also, early voting over a two-week period limits lines. Wouldn't it be a table-turner, if the GOP has long lines on Nov 4, the way they used to suppress the vote in black neighborhoods by causing long lines?
I hear you but several things come to mind. If early voting is a proxy for turnout, this is good for Dems. Also, early voting over a two-week period limits lines. Wouldn't it be a table-turner, if the GOP has long lines on Nov 4, the way they used to suppress the vote in black neighborhoods by causing long lines?
His opinion, like most of them, didn't influence me. What influenced me was my own experiences with the Post Office and rural carriers. Just this past week a package was delivered a day late because my driveway was allegedly blocked. No, it wasn't.
They could have long lines in Texas on Election Day. I believe Republicans changed the ballots so you can no longer vote a straight ticket. That makes voting take longer because you have to vote each race individually so the lines could be longer. Apparently they thought Beto got close to taking down Cruz because too many people voted a straight Democrat ballot.
Do you think that situation is so common that it would throw off an election by thousands of ballots? Some states have managed to do mail in ballots with little to no issue.
Do you think that situation is so common that it would throw off an election by thousands of ballots? Some states have managed to do mail in ballots with little to no issue.
I'm a big AZ Cardinals fan. I certainly enjoyed the beatdown the cowgirls received on Monday night.
I my "Texas - going blue?" thread from 3 days ago I noted that Texas is far ahead of others in relative volume of early votes. In fact, yesterday it already passed TOTAL early vote of 2016 with more busy early voting ahead.
I showed that the polls still had Texas squarely in red territory (-5, -4, -5, -7 points in Trump direction) but they were all polls from a couple weeks earlier.
So with such heavy early voting volume, I wondered...
I finally got my answer today.
Quinnipiac University: a tie!!
Data for Progress: Biden +1!!
Trump has been complaining that because of absentee ballots not counted as of election night, we won't know right away who won. He wanted the SCOTUS to rule that ballots couldn't be counted after election day.
I hope not either; we need to retain some kind of confidence in our system of governance. What I find asking myself every time Trump bashes mail in voting is "well, you're the president, so what are you doing about that?". I don't expect the president himself to solve it, but surely more could have worked with those who can to ensure voters can trust the mail in voting process rather than have the president cast all sorts of doubts about it.
They could have long lines in Texas on Election Day. I believe Republicans changed the ballots so you can no longer vote a straight ticket. That makes voting take longer because you have to vote each race individually so the lines could be longer. Apparently they thought Beto got close to taking down Cruz because too many people voted a straight Democrat ballot.
I am sure you know what the rattlesnake was doing about it. He tried very hard to minimize the number of mail-in ballots by defunding the USPS and did not keep his intentions a secret. His fear was not voter fraud, but the partisan disparity, knowing most ballots will be filled out by Democrats.
Yeah, it's an absolute crapshow. That the president of the US has stated the only way he will lose is if there is fraud says all you need to know about his stance. Not acknowledging the very clear possibility a significant amount of the population doesn't want to vote for him is pretty absurd.
... Kentucky a week+ ago (the discovery of ballots that had been dumped) ...
I take it there is no concern about mail-in ballots changing the way others will vote in 13 days? My mom told me for that reason, our ballots cannot be counted until after all polls close on November 3 even though we voted on September 29.
This still does not change the state's current tossup status. It would have to a blowout for either candidate to hear he won Texas shortly after all the polls close.
It is impossible to prevent someone from voting straight ticket. Even if the letters D and R do not appear on ballots, everyone knows who to vote for except those who paid no attention to federal and state politics all year.
He knows the real reason people don't want to vote for him and has been lying about the risk of voter fraud. At least one other member said even Trump himself votes by mail.
Trump is the best thing to happen to democrats since the Roosevelt presidency.
Dunno about Texas but I have lived in states where the ballot included boxes for "Democrat" and "Republican" as well as for individual candidates. You only had to check the party box to vote a straight ticket. Or you could split the vote by checking boxes for each race.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?