• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Official: Some Clinton emails too damaging to release

I meant every word I said, and I see no reason to sugar-coat the ugly truth. Obama and Mrs. Clinton are both habitual liars who have contempt for the Constitution and the rule of law. They are also Alinsky-style Marxists who resent most things American and do not wish this country well. Many of their supporters try to portray themselves as "liberals" or "progressives"--the cosmopolitan good guys who are defending all things noble and wondrous against the nativist hordes. A lot of us see through that disguise.

I'm have no doubt that you meant every word you said, and would do it all over again. I just prefer to use different words is all.
 
Good! So you will be able to stand for election as Dog Warden if you want a run at elected office.

I am retired. I only do what I want. You stand for election as dog catcher.
 
If so, and the FBI gets a leak in the dam, we could have a Constitutional Crisis that would make Watergate and Iran/Contra look like an elementary school kid cheating on a test. I truly hope that Obama has more integrity than that.

Hold your breath. I wanna watch. :funny
 
No dice. The whole purpose of the classification system is to prevent information originating within the government from being made public. You can't classify a press article that originated in the public domain, is viewed by millions of people, and remains in the public domain as top secret years later. It never was and it isn't now.

You couldn't be more wrong on so many levels if you worked at it.
 
:lol: once we ran out of food money that we had budgeted for before the month ran out, and when my wife came to tell me about it, I was fresh out of the field and still in Marine mode.

Apparently "Suck it up, buttercup, chow is continuous. Here's half of the MRE I have left, that ought to last you a couple of days" was not the correct answer.

Yeah, that doesn't work.
 
Is that why her own people are asking for them to be released. Never forget person has the right to see the evidence and since the evidence is being used to attack them publically then they have the right to allow the public know the truth.

They know they are top secret and the agency that classified the info top secret won't declassify the information so they can demand all day long and it won't be released. It is a sham to make her look less guilty. Nobody has the right to see top secret information if they don't have a need to know.
 
I don't know. They could still spin it as a vast right wing conspiracy and issue sweeping pardons as "a way to stop the Republicans in Congress from wasting any more time and money on useless investigations ..." and so on. I don't know if that would float, but the bigger the turd, the more buoyant it becomes.

I wonder how many times a day Obama cusses Hillary.
 
:lol: once we ran out of food money that we had budgeted for before the month ran out, and when my wife came to tell me about it, I was fresh out of the field and still in Marine mode.

Apparently "Suck it up, buttercup, chow is continuous. Here's half of the MRE I have left, that ought to last you a couple of days" was not the correct answer.

I got in trouble with a few mothers of Boy Scouts in the troop I was the Scoutmaster over, when at a campout the new boys went over to the first aid box, opened it up and found a mirror on one side with a box of tissues, and a sign on the other that said "Suck it up. Be a man."
 
Are you trying to be misleading here or are you genuinely misinformed?

It is not "the Republicans" who are investigating Hillary Clinton, it is the State Department and the FBI.

It is dishonorable to knowingly lie about a political candidate and a very bad thing for the country when everyone begins participating in lies. 22 of Hillary's Emails are 'Top Secret'; Won't Be Released - Christine Rousselle

One small correction here. The State Department is pretending to investigate it. Kennedy is doing everything he can to cover for Hillary without breaking the law.
Report: State officials hiding extent of classified info on Clinton servers | Washington Examiner
State Dept. withheld newly released Clinton classification forms from Congress | Washington Examiner
How the State Department Caved to Hillary Clinton?s Lawyer on Classified Emails - The Daily Beast
State Department misled on Hillary Clinton emails, investigation concludes - Washington Times
 
They know they are top secret and the agency that classified the info top secret won't declassify the information so they can demand all day long and it won't be released. It is a sham to make her look less guilty. Nobody has the right to see top secret information if they don't have a need to know.

That might make her look even more guilty to a lot of people. They might wonder why, if these communications were so secret the government can't even reveal what was said, she was handling them so carelessly. The average person does not need to know the identities and itineraries of covert U.S. agents overseas, for example, to know that it is intolerable for the Secretary of State or any other senior official with access to that information not to be fastidious--always--about following established procedures for safeguarding it.
 
That might make her look even more guilty to a lot of people. They might wonder why, if these communications were so secret they can't even reveal what was said, she was handling them so carelessly. The average person does not need to know the identities and itineraries of covert U.S. agents overseas, for example, to know that it is intolerable for the Secretary of State or any other senior official with access to that information not to be fastidious--always--about following established procedures for safeguarding it.

The Clinton team always doubles down. She insisted that all of her emails be made public when the personal server became public. Now the releases are eating her campaign alive. They always think short term. That is what happens with liars, get out the bind they are in now and they will deal with fallout later.
 
I got in trouble with a few mothers of Boy Scouts in the troop I was the Scoutmaster over, when at a campout the new boys went over to the first aid box, opened it up and found a mirror on one side with a box of tissues, and a sign on the other that said "Suck it up. Be a man."

See, but that's exactly what boy scouts should be.

"Alright, gents, we can see that Billy here has fallen and shoved a sharpened stick through his thigh. Billy, this is going to be your test-out for self-aid. Once he's done, each of you are going to unwrap his bindings and practice applying buddy-aid. If Billy makes it through this without passing out from blood loss, all of you get your merit badges."
 
See, but that's exactly what boy scouts should be.

"Alright, gents, we can see that Billy here has fallen and shoved a sharpened stick through his thigh. Billy, this is going to be your test-out for self-aid. Once he's done, each of you are going to unwrap his bindings and practice applying buddy-aid. If Billy makes it through this without passing out from blood loss, all of you get your merit badges."

Sounds like the way we did it.
 
The Clinton team always doubles down. She insisted that all of her emails be made public when the personal server became public. Now the releases are eating her campaign alive. They always think short term. That is what happens with liars, get out the bind they are in now and they will deal with fallout later.

Exactly. That is always what trips up arrogant liars like Lady Cankles. They get intoxicated by the idea that they are so damn clever they can always cover one lie with another. But at some point so many lies build up that they contradict each other, and it's no longer possible to keep the story straight. At that point, the person is cornered, like the witness in those old movies who the prosecutor finally roars at: "Were you lying then, or are you lying now?"
 
The Delaware Dunce and Pocahontas! A numbskull who's barely fit to be mayor of Dover, and another damned lying commie much like the Belle of Benghazi. What did the United States ever do to deserve that?

It's the best the democrats may be able to come up with, but there'll be ardent supporters for those two here on DP. If Rasputin ran with a "D" behind his name and he called himself a progressive, there'd be some here all in for that.
 
It's the best the democrats may be able to come up with, but there'll be ardent supporters for those two here on DP. If Rasputin ran with a "D" behind his name and he called himself a progressive, there'd be some here all in for that.

The bottom line is that even hardened democrats believe she is not a leader, has no character, lacks integrity, refuses to admit any mistakes, and will do or say anything to achieve her goal to be Commander in Chief.
 
Enough to buy beer for all the staff each week on the quarters he has to put in the "Swear Jar."

wonder if the white house looked like this


and now back to the discussion about hillary's pending indictment. i'll drink to that
 
I am retired. I only do what I want. You stand for election as dog catcher.

In only notionally democratic Sweden nobody much is elected. Not judges, police chiefs, school boards or even dog catchers. Every four years we get to vote for party lists - not people - for parliament, the EU pretend-parliament, the commune council and that's it.
 
Well. I wonder if this is some of the material behind the "we may resign" rumors floating out of the FBI.

It doesn't f*ing matter. The Obama admin just announced they will not demote Petreous. ????? Why???????? so those miserable aholes can take cover when the corrupt liberal muthaf^chas at the Obama DOJ announces not prosecute Hillary;
 
It doesn't f*ing matter. The Obama admin just announced they will not demote Petreous. ????? Why???????? so those miserable aholes can take cover when the corrupt liberal muthaf^chas at the Obama DOJ announces not prosecute Hillary;

I would bet that was part of the consideration, yes.
 
There is no news here!!!


the slimy a$$ zero-character liberal douche-bags could not care less for the Constitution or the Rule of Law. As long as their representative of their **** values gets the nomination.
 
They know they are top secret and the agency that classified the info top secret won't declassify the information so they can demand all day long and it won't be released. It is a sham to make her look less guilty. Nobody has the right to see top secret information if they don't have a need to know.
The Clinton camp is become ever more brazen in the hope that the party faithful (Los Stupidos) will remain loyal.
Hillary Clinton’s campaign is accusing the Intelligence Community Inspector General and congressional Republicans of coordinating against its candidate to damage her electoral chances, in the latest flare-up of the nearly yearlong scandal over her use of a private server while secretary of state.
Read more: 2016 election: Hillary Clinton campaign accuses GOP of 'coordinated leak' in email scandal - POLITICO
 
Back
Top Bottom