• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

ODNI Declassification Casts Doubt on 2016 Russian hacking DNC narrative

NOLA Dude said:
Its called context. We dont want Russia or anyone interfering in our elections. But when we catch them doing what we do on a much more massive scale its laughable when Democrats act like it was the next Pearl Harbor.
Click to expand...
So you trying to down pay it does not play right into their hands. Good job comrade.
 
NOLA Dude said:
Its called context. We dont want Russia or anyone interfering in our elections. But when we catch them doing what we do on a much more massive scale its laughable when Democrats act like it was the next Pearl Harbor.
Click to expand...
Republicans called a CBS interview with Kamala Harris "election interference". LOLOL
 
element94 said:
  • Paul Manafort’s presence on the Trump Campaign and proximity to then-Candidate Trump created opportunities for Russian intelligence services to exert influence over, and acquire confidential information on, the Trump Campaign

There's some well worded bullshit in the above quote because there was acknowledgment of Trump campaign team contact with Russian operatives, maybe not Kislyak 😏 but other Russian operatives.
Click to expand...
Mueller report:

1000008784.webp
 
SCrider said:
Deflection and spin.
Click to expand...
The Epstein stuff must be even more effective than I realized. You can tell because Trump is throwing out OBAMA to the very not racist base.
 
The Brad Dad said:
The Epstein stuff must be even more effective than I realized. You can tell because Trump is throwing out OBAMA to the very not racist base.
Click to expand...
100%
 
The Brad Dad said:
The Epstein stuff must be even more effective than I realized. You can tell because Trump is throwing out OBAMA to the very not racist base.
Click to expand...
Not sure about the racism part, but it coordinates with Trump trying to claim Obama was responsible for the Epstein files. If Gabbard can convince the MAGA rubes that Obama is criminally culpable for "Russia, Russia, Russia!" maybe they'll believe the Epstein files are a Democratic hoax.
 
Airyaman said:
Not sure about the racism part, but it coordinates with Trump trying to claim Obama was responsible for the Epstein files. If Gabbard can convince the MAGA rubes that Obama is criminally culpable for "Russia, Russia, Russia!" maybe they'll believe the Epstein files are a Democratic hoax.
Click to expand...
They are really trying hard to make what is going to come out and embarrass Trump to look not credible.

But it is the dumbest conspiracy ever.
 
Airyaman said:
Not sure about the racism part, but it coordinates with Trump trying to claim Obama was responsible for the Epstein files. If Gabbard can convince the MAGA rubes that Obama is criminally culpable for "Russia, Russia, Russia!" maybe they'll believe the Epstein files are a Democratic hoax.
Click to expand...
All Trump has to do to put a cattle prod up this base's ass is say the words "Barack Hussain Obama".
 
Jezcoe said:
They are really trying hard to make what is going to come out and embarrass Trump to look not credible.

But it is the dumbest conspiracy ever.
Click to expand...
Trump admitted the other day that he is in the Epstein files.



"So I would imagine if they were run by Chris Ray and they were run by Comey, and because it was actually even before that administration, they've been running these files, and so much of the things that we found were fake with me."
 
element94 said:
I've already given my opinion on the Mueller Report, and yet still(!) the republican-led Senate Committee found contacts by Trump's campaign team posed a "grave national security threat". You, apparently, are OK with that.
Click to expand...
The Mueller investigation had endless resources but you want us to believe that the Senate found what Mueller couldn't and they didn't provide any additional evidence in addition to what Mueller found. Hmmm
 
Jezcoe said:
Yeah.... they didn't have the evidence make a link.

One of the reasons why they couldn't get the evidence was because Manafort and others destroyed evidence.

From page 10 of the Mueller Report.

View attachment 67580623
Click to expand...
But the Senste intelligence report was able to find that evidence they destroyed? 😆
 
NOLA Dude said:
The Mueller investigation had endless resources but you want us to believe that the Senate found what Mueller couldn't and they didn't provide any additional evidence in addition to what Mueller found. Hmmm
Click to expand...
LOL When was the last time you heard a presidential candidate's campaign was a Senate declared "grave national security risk"? The running cover for this slime "president" is just absolutely astonishing.
 
element94 said:
LOL When was the last time you heard a presidential candidate's campaign was a Senate declared "grave national security risk"? The running cover for this slime "president" is just absolutely astonishing.
Click to expand...
Its meaningless when they dont provide any evidence for the claim.
 
NOLA Dude said:
But the Senste intelligence report was able to find that evidence they destroyed? 😆
Click to expand...
The Senate Intelligence Report unlike the Mueller Report wasn't a tool to make criminal prosecutions.

Mueller was bound by different standards than the Senate in that if he was to make a prosecutable claim then he would have to have the evidence to back it up in court beyond reasonable doubt.

That standard is one of the reason's why the Durham report is trash... he failed to prove his central claims in a court of law but still included them in his report.
 
NOLA Dude said:
Its meaningless when they dont provide any evidence for the claim.
Click to expand...
What we do know is that Manafort gave inside campaign information directly to Russian Intelligence.

What happened with that information is fuzzy because there is no certain proof as to what they did with it.

But at the end of the the head of a Presidential Campaign gave their inside polling data directly to Russian Intelligence and that is something that we all used to agree is a bad thing to do.
 
NOLA Dude said:
Its meaningless when they dont provide any evidence for the claim.
Click to expand...
🤔
The nearly 1,000-page report, the fifth and final one from the Republican-led Senate intelligence committee on the Russia investigation, details how Russia launched an aggressive effort to interfere in the election on Trump’s behalf. It says the Trump campaign chairman had regular contact with a Russian intelligence officer and that other Trump associates were eager to exploit the Kremlin’s aid, particularly by maximizing the impact of the disclosure of Democratic emails hacked by Russian intelligence officers.
Click to expand...
apnews.com

Trump campaign's Russia contacts 'grave' threat, Senate says

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump campaign’s interactions with Russian intelligence services during the 2016 presidential election posed a “grave” counterintelligence threat, a Senate panel concluded Tuesday as it detailed how associates of Donald Trump had regular contact with Russians and expected to be
apnews.com apnews.com
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom