• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

ODNI Declassification Casts Doubt on 2016 Russian hacking DNC narrative

NOLA Dude said:
The Trump colluded with Russia to win the election has now confirmed to be complete horseshit.
Click to expand...
That Trump directly colluded with Russia was never the core findings of several investigations.
They all determined that Russia did indeed try to influence the 2016 elections in Trumps favor.

RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 U.S. ELECTIONS​


CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT AN OFFENSE AGAINST THE UNITED STATES; FALSE REGISTRATION OF A DOMAIN NAME; AGGRAVATED IDENTITY THEFT; CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MONEY LAUNDERING
www.fbi.gov

RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 U.S. ELECTIONS | Federal Bureau of Investigation

CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT AN OFFENSE AGAINST THE UNITED STATES; FALSE REGISTRATION OF A DOMAIN NAME; AGGRAVATED IDENTITY THEFT; CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MONEY LAUNDERING
www.fbi.gov www.fbi.gov

Senate panel finds Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election​

www.pbs.org

Senate panel finds Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election

The report purposely does not come to a final conclusion, as the other reports did, about whether there is enough evidence that Trump’s campaign coordinated or colluded with Russia to sway the election, leaving its findings open to partisan interpretation.
www.pbs.org www.pbs.org

Senate Intel Releases Election Security Findings in First Volume of Bipartisan Russia Report​

Senate Intel Releases Election Security Findings in First Volume of Bipartisan Russia Report | Senate Select Committee on Intelligence

www.intelligence.senate.gov www.intelligence.senate.gov
 
element94 said:
I'm getting tired of having to post this but here we go again - "Republican-led Senate Committee..."
Click to expand...
Republicans also lied and said Russia hacked our election.

 
KingLeo said:
That Trump directly colluded with Russia was never the core findings of several investigations.
They all determined that Russia did indeed try to influence the 2016 elections in Trumps favor.

RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 U.S. ELECTIONS​


CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT AN OFFENSE AGAINST THE UNITED STATES; FALSE REGISTRATION OF A DOMAIN NAME; AGGRAVATED IDENTITY THEFT; CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MONEY LAUNDERING
www.fbi.gov

RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 U.S. ELECTIONS | Federal Bureau of Investigation

CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT AN OFFENSE AGAINST THE UNITED STATES; FALSE REGISTRATION OF A DOMAIN NAME; AGGRAVATED IDENTITY THEFT; CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MONEY LAUNDERING
www.fbi.gov www.fbi.gov

Senate panel finds Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election​

www.pbs.org

Senate panel finds Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election

The report purposely does not come to a final conclusion, as the other reports did, about whether there is enough evidence that Trump’s campaign coordinated or colluded with Russia to sway the election, leaving its findings open to partisan interpretation.
www.pbs.org www.pbs.org

Senate Intel Releases Election Security Findings in First Volume of Bipartisan Russia Report​

Senate Intel Releases Election Security Findings in First Volume of Bipartisan Russia Report | Senate Select Committee on Intelligence

www.intelligence.senate.gov www.intelligence.senate.gov
Click to expand...
That was debunked yesterday:

Thread 'Declassified 2016 Presidential Daily Briefing from Obama Intelligence Agencies that reveals Russia did not impact the 2016 election' https://debatepolitics.com/threads/...ssia-did-not-impact-the-2016-election.573592/
 
NOLA Dude said:


View attachment 67580603

It turns out the FBI and NSA had "low confidence" in pinning the 2016 DNC and DCCC data leaks on Russia due to insufficient technical evidence. The document even suggests Russia lacked the intent and capability to hack the election, and the IC didn’t assess any impact. This flips the script on the whole Russiagate narrative!

The DNC relied on CrowdStrike instead of letting the FBI directly access the servers which was an immediate red flag.
Click to expand...

Just more revelations on how the Obama administration, the democrat party, the Hillary campaign all conspired to cheat to win an election.
 
SCrider said:
Those documents do not say what you claim they say. I don't blame you though you get your ideas from random pod casters with an agenda.
Click to expand...
Oh well that settles it especially because you were unable to substantiate your claim/sarcasm off
 
NOLA Dude said:
Thread 'Declassified 2016 Presidential Daily Briefing from Obama Intelligence Agencies that reveals Russia did not impact the 2016 election' https://debatepolitics.com/threads/...ssia-did-not-impact-the-2016-election.573592/

Also Mueller report:

View attachment 67580614
View attachment 67580615
Click to expand...
The Mueller Report, another colossal waste of tax-payer money. The Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee later found Trump's contacts with Russian operatives during the 2016 campaign was a grave national security risk, so what in the actual f...
After seeing Mueller at his hearing after the report was released looked like he didn't even know how to answer their questions. Was he fit for this job? It was one hell of a WTF moment!
 
Poor MAGA, you guys never learn.

football.gif


Did Trump collude with Russia? Evidence does not support, learned that years ago.
Did Russia hack Democrat organizations' emails? Evidence we learned years ago supports that.
Did Russia try to use social media and other measures to influence the 2016 election? Yes, even the Senate concluded that.

Gabbard is trying to conflate the issues to build a strawman to distract MAGA rubes so they'll stop talking about Trump/Epstein.

Not going to work.
 
Airyaman said:
You know you've lost the plot when even the Dilbert guy sees through your bullshit.



Like I said, nothing more than a distraction for the MAGA rubes.
Click to expand...

Man... When Scott Adams sees what is going on... you have gone full on stupid.
 
Integrityrespec said:
Just more revelations on how the Obama administration, the democrat party, the Hillary campaign all conspired to cheat to win an election.
Click to expand...
Nope not what that says at all.

It says that Russia did not hack the system. That is all it says.

Getting your information from CT asking for tips on X is a bad way to go.
 
NOLA Dude said:
Oh well that settles it especially because you were unable to substantiate your claim/sarcasm off
Click to expand...
The documents say Russia ddi not Hack the system to change votes.
These documents do not touch the other aspects of what Russia did through Social Media and fake posts.

They system is not hackable so these documents don't mean shit.

read the documents and not the words of the CT kooks asking for money on X.
 
NOLA Dude said:
That was debunked yesterday:

Thread 'Declassified 2016 Presidential Daily Briefing from Obama Intelligence Agencies that reveals Russia did not impact the 2016 election' https://debatepolitics.com/threads/...ssia-did-not-impact-the-2016-election.573592/
Click to expand...
'Debunked'?
No.
A different opinion from the other multiple investigations?
Yes.
Did Russia attempt to interfere in the 2016 election?
Yes.
Did Russia and other countries try again in the 2020 and even the latest 2024 elections?
Yes.

A look at the foreign influences trying to interfere with the U.S. election​

The U.S. government has disrupted Russian influence operations targeting U.S. voters. And it says Iran is behind attempts to hack the campaigns of both presidential candidates.
 
This is how Russia interfered in the election:

apnews.com

Right-wing influencers were duped to work for covert Russian operation, US says

An indictment alleges a media company linked to six conservative influencers — including Tim Pool, Dave Rubin and Benny Johnson — was secretly funded by Russian state media employees.
apnews.com apnews.com

From the posts here from certain CT MAGAs i would say they are still doing it.
 
SCrider said:
This is how Russia interfered in the election:

apnews.com

Right-wing influencers were duped to work for covert Russian operation, US says

An indictment alleges a media company linked to six conservative influencers — including Tim Pool, Dave Rubin and Benny Johnson — was secretly funded by Russian state media employees.
apnews.com apnews.com

From the posts here from certain CT MAGAs i would say they are still doing it.
Click to expand...
Cool. Now do the US interference in foreign elections. I believe the number is 81 foreign elections the US has interfered in that we know of.
 
NOLA Dude said:


View attachment 67580603

It turns out the FBI and NSA had "low confidence" in pinning the 2016 DNC and DCCC data leaks on Russia due to insufficient technical evidence. The document even suggests Russia lacked the intent and capability to hack the election, and the IC didn’t assess any impact. This flips the script on the whole Russiagate narrative!

The DNC relied on CrowdStrike instead of letting the FBI directly access the servers which was an immediate red flag.
Click to expand...

Then its weird trump went to all that trouble to collude with them.
 
NOLA Dude said:
Cool. Now do the US interference in foreign elections. I believe the number is 81 foreign elections the US has interfered in that we know of.
Click to expand...
So is your point that Russia didn't interfere or that we do it too so it's all fair?
 
NOLA Dude said:
Cool. Now do the US interference in foreign elections. I believe the number is 81 foreign elections the US has interfered in that we know of.
Click to expand...
Yes, we do and often with disastrous long term results.

Not sure why that gives you cover for falling for the same thing here?
 
SCrider said:
Yes, we do and often with disastrous long term results.

Not sure why that gives you cover for falling for the same thing here?
Click to expand...
Once they asked you that I lost the point of the thread.
 
SCrider said:
Yes, we do and often with disastrous long term results.

Not sure why that gives you cover for falling for the same thing here?
Click to expand...
Its called context. We dont want Russia or anyone interfering in our elections. But when we catch them doing what we do on a much more massive scale its laughable when Democrats act like it was the next Pearl Harbor.
 
Airyaman said:

Rubio Statement on Senate Intel Release of Volume 5 of Bipartisan Russia Report | Senate Select Committee on Intelligence

www.intelligence.senate.gov www.intelligence.senate.gov
Click to expand...
  • Paul Manafort’s presence on the Trump Campaign and proximity to then-Candidate Trump created opportunities for Russian intelligence services to exert influence over, and acquire confidential information on, the Trump Campaign

There's some well worded bullshit in the above quote because there was acknowledgment of Trump campaign team contact with Russian operatives, maybe not Kislyak 😏 but other Russian operatives.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom