- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
- Messages
- 134,496
- Reaction score
- 14,621
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Not to worry, Adam, the worst thing that could happen right now would be if Obama was ahead by large margin. This way GOP donors will put their money on Perry. About Texas Governors... Fool me once, shame you, fool me twice shame on me.
Not to worry, Adam, the worst thing that could happen right now would be if Obama was ahead by large margin. This way GOP donors will put their money on Perry. About Texas Governors... Fool me once, shame you, fool me twice shame on me.
Would love to have either one of you provide for me the record of Obama's that beats the Bush record using the average over 8 years of Bush and the average of 2 1/2 years for Obama. I believe you both will find that the "fool me once, shame on your, fool be twice shame on me" will relate to the Obama record, not the Bush record. I anxiously await your results but fully expect you both to run.
The total Bush Administration hands down beats Carter and Obama so don't even go there because you have no clue as to what you are talking about. It will be the Obama record on the ballot and things are worse today than when he took office on the all important jobs, misery index, and debt which is contrary to what he promised.
Not according to the scholars who study these things. Although I'm sure they're not as unbiased as you are. :2rofll:
Aggregate Rank:
Carter - 27
Shrub - 34 (two spots below Nixon)
Historical rankings of Presidents of the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Why thank you. Not that I agree, mind you.You have been, and continue to be, one of the least informed persons on the board.
I suppose, for the sake of argument, that you would include yourself as one of the more informed.You continue to make these unsubstantiated statements that contribute nothing to healthy debate, but only serve to raise the blood pressure of the more informed.
From what I have seen nothing would change your mind.Stop being so shallow. This is DEBATE politics, not 3rd grade playground argument.
I know enough. I know that policy drove the crash of the mortgage markets. I know that powerful democrats were behind that policy. I know that corrupt democrats sheltered Fannie And Freddie. Take a look. And if you want more I can offer you more.You have much to learn about the housing crisis... why don't you do some homework before your next post and actually teach us something while making your point. I have no issue with you taking positions contrary to me or others. I do have issue with trite comments from the ill-informed.
Do you not understand that banks were pressured by the Congress and the Administration to make those loans? If they did not make the loans they were prevented from growing. The right answer is always less government, not more government.true......but the banks made the loans.
Only fourteen more months of the one term Marxist president? We ought to have a countdown clock for it.Lucky for Obama the election is still 14 months away, eh?
The House Republicans passed a bill to eliminate Obamacare. That is the beginning of jobs. In the next Congress I hope we will see them begin to roll back the administrative state with its 80,000 regulations. I hope they will reduce the size of each of the extra-constitutional departments and agencies. And is subsequent years I hope they fire all the people, sell the buildings and free us from tyranny by unaccountable administrators.Uhmmm so these new Republicans that ran on jobs, jobs, jobs what have they proposed in the way of jobs? Or maybe a jobs bill?
I know you don't want to read it, but seriously, I don't want you to be surprised on Wed. Nov. 7, 2012. The guy isn't just guessing, he knows why President win. Ignore this at your own peril.Would love to have either one of you provide for me the record of Obama's that beats the Bush record using the average over 8 years of Bush and the average of 2 1/2 years for Obama. I believe you both will find that the "fool me once, shame on your, fool be twice shame on me" will relate to the Obama record, not the Bush record. I anxiously await your results but fully expect you both to run.
Tell me how a Balanced Budget amendment that would take years if ever to pass help???
:lamo This is just plain stupid, thanks for the laugh.Why thank you. Not that I agree, mind you.
I suppose, for the sake of argument, that you would include yourself as one of the more informed.
From what I have seen nothing would change your mind.
I know enough. I know that policy drove the crash of the mortgage markets. I know that powerful democrats were behind that policy. I know that corrupt democrats sheltered Fannie And Freddie. Take a look. And if you want more I can offer you more.
If you don't like it here, move to Somalia, I'm sure there isn't any regulations there.The House Republicans passed a bill to eliminate Obamacare. That is the beginning of jobs. In the next Congress I hope we will see them begin to roll back the administrative state with its 80,000 regulations. I hope they will reduce the size of each of the extra-constitutional departments and agencies. And is subsequent years I hope they fire all the people, sell the buildings and free us from tyranny by unaccountable administrators.
What kind of bull**** comparison is that? You want to compare the years Bush benefited by the housing bubble with Obama, who's record has only been damaged by it.Would love to have either one of you provide for me the record of Obama's that beats the Bush record using the average over 8 years of Bush and the average of 2 1/2 years for Obama.
Do you not understand that banks were pressured by the Congress and the Administration to make those loans? If they did not make the loans they were prevented from growing. The right answer is always less government, not more government.
What kind of bull**** comparison is that? You want to compare the years Bush benefited by the housing bubble with Obama, who's record has only been damaged by it.
... and ... which party controlled the House in 2004? ... which party controlled the Senate in 2004? ... which party controlled the Executive Branch in 2004?Do you not understand that banks were pressured by the Congress and the Administration to make those loans? If they did not make the loans they were prevented from growing. The right answer is always less government, not more government.
I know you don't want to read it, but seriously, I don't want you to be surprised on Wed. Nov. 7, 2012. The guy isn't just guessing, he knows why President win. Ignore this at your own peril.
Never-Wrong Pundit Picks Obama to Win in 2012 - Washington Whispers (usnews.com)
... and ... which party controlled the House in 2004? ... which party controlled the Senate in 2004? ... which party controlled the Executive Branch in 2004?
:roll:
"Thanks to our policies, home ownership in America is at an all-time high." ~ George Bush, 9.2.2004, RNC acceptance speech
That's an opinion piece by the right wing WSJ.:roll:It is 2011 in case you missed it and don't have a calendar
Mary Kissel: Justice's New War Against Lenders - WSJ.com
No President in modern history has ever won with unemployment over 8% or the rest of his record like Obama's. Some never pay any attention to results and you and the rest of the Obama supporters are going to do everything you can to divert from the Obama record. There is always a first time for everything and the Obama record doesn't warrant re-election.
That's an opinion piece by the right wing WSJ.:roll:
Did you read the article???
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?