...President Obama’s operating principle is: If Congress won’t do what I want, I’ll do it on my own through executive orders, Constitution be damned. The president’s approach here has to be understood in the wider context of the Democratic party’s newfound commitment to totalitarianism: attempting to repeal the First Amendment, seeking to lock people up for expressing unpopular political opinions, proposing that Americans be stripped of their constitutional rights (with no due process, trial, or appeal) if the president puts their names on a secret list, outlawing unapproved criticism of political figures by private citizens, denouncing political opponents as “traitors” and demanding that nonconformists be punished for “disloyalty” while making glib references to martial law, etc....
If Steven Hayes of the Weekly Standard can be deprived of his constitutional rights because his name appears on a secret presidential list, then so can Paul Krugman or Rachel Maddow. If the Second Amendment can be treated as optional at the president’s discretion, then so can the First. If Pfizer can be sanctioned by the federal government for making entirely legal and ethical business decisions that the president doesn’t like, so can Microsoft, Google, and Facebook. If President Obama can circumvent Congress in both domestic and international affairs simply because he’s unhappy with the way the people’s elected representatives are conducting their business, then so can President Cruz, President Rubio, President Fiorina . . .
Or, angels and ministers of grace defend us, President Trump. Last week, the civically illiterate reality-television grotesque declared before a meeting of a policemen’s union that one of his first acts in office would be to issue an executive order mandating capital punishment for anybody convicted of murdering a police officer. Never mind that the president has no such power and that Trump doesn’t seem to understand the difference between state and federal law; we have so quickly accustomed ourselves to believing that anything that sounds good to us is right and proper (“constitutional” in 2015 anno Domini means “I like it”) that no one other than a few persnickety constitutionalists even bothered to note how nuts Trump’s promise is. In this, as in many things, Trump resembles Barack Obama and the Clinton mob, who have been, it bears remembering, his traditional political allies....
Remember, Democrats: These are your rules.
Kevin Williamson excellently makes a point that I've made several times in here whenever the Presidents' supporters cheer on his (often either Constitutionally questionable or downright destructive) expansions of Executive Power, whether it is re-writing laws, refusing to enforce laws, or changing national policy beyond his prerogative. He is setting a precedent, and you may be less excited about the way that power gets used in the next administration.
"President Cruz Announces that the IRS will use prosecutorial discretion and not punish anyone who chooses simply to pay a flat tax" has a nice ring. "President Rubio has signed an executive order ordering the government to immediate cease implementing all rules and regulations in Obamacare", too.I seem to remember some folks on this sight that all but wet themselves then it was proposed that McConnell use the nuclear option in one instance, ignoring the fact that it was Harry Reid that brought it to the forefront. Short term thinkers. When the Republican wins I will not approve of the use of the power that Obummer has used but I will revel in the wailing and gnashing of teeth when the left starts the whinerfest. We can then say, "Obama did it" and be totally correct.
I seem to remember some folks on this sight that all but wet themselves then it was proposed that McConnell use the nuclear option in one instance, ignoring the fact that it was Harry Reid that brought it to the forefront. Short term thinkers. When the Republican wins I will not approve of the use of the power that Obummer has used but I will revel in the wailing and gnashing of teeth when the left starts the whinerfest. We can then say, "Obama did it" and be totally correct.
I seem to recall the Republican teeth-gnashing, and all anyone had to do to stop that was say "Bush did it."
"President Cruz Announces that the IRS will use prosecutorial discretion and not punish anyone who chooses simply to pay a flat tax" has a nice ring. "President Rubio has signed an executive order ordering the government to immediate cease implementing all rules and regulations in Obamacare", too.
Kevin Williamson excellently makes a point that I've made several times in here whenever the Presidents' supporters cheer on his (often either Constitutionally questionable or downright destructive) expansions of Executive Power, whether it is re-writing laws, refusing to enforce laws, or changing national policy beyond his prerogative. He is setting a precedent, and you may be less excited about the way that power gets used in the next administration.
I really am not for more power for the President regardless of the party that president comes from. I do, however, love karma. We need to really reel back the power that a president has for long term. It is going to be interesting.
The power of impeachment has lately been underrated.
I don't think a GOP POTUS would need to resort to such tactics as long as the Senate and House are both GOP controlled.
And BHO needs to be ever vigilant now because the House can impeach him and the Senate send him home early.
What bothers me is what the Republicans did the last time they controlled all three houses. The spent like a bunch of Democrats.
If it weren't for that darn Obama, executive powers would never have existed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?