- Joined
- Jun 9, 2011
- Messages
- 2,320
- Reaction score
- 1,033
- Location
- Planet Earth
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Yay! Four...FOUR WHOLE PEOPLE that this P.O.S. law helps. What about the tens of thousands who got their hours cut because of 0bamaCare? What about the thousands flat-out laid off? What about the MILLIONS who will have their deductibles and monthly fees jacked up higher than 0bama's nose in the air, because of it?
If four is all you have then piss on those four. Socialists should be well versed in the "not for the individual, but for the collective" groupthink.
There is no actual indication that this is happening. The statistics aren't showing a huge burst in employees losing hours. Just *cough* anecdotes.Yay! Four...FOUR WHOLE PEOPLE that this P.O.S. law helps. What about the tens of thousands who got their hours cut because of 0bamaCare?
Millions were laid off... because of the recession. Unemployment is slowly dropping. Oh, and people have been leaving the workforce since 2001; that's a demographic issue (retiring Baby Boomers), not a health care issue.What about the thousands flat-out laid off?
Health insurance costs are actually coming in much lower than initially expected.What about the MILLIONS who will have their deductibles and monthly fees jacked up higher than 0bama's nose in the air, because of it?
Yeah, too bad that the ACA is fundamentally a conservative idea, posited as a free-market solution that stops people from freeloading on the system, and that keeps the insurance companies in business, and is working out fine in Massachussetts. Romneycare vs. Obamacare: Lessons for today's 'shutdown' debacle (+video) - CSMonitor.comSocialists should be well versed in the "not for the individual, but for the collective" groupthink.
Yay! Four...FOUR WHOLE PEOPLE that this P.O.S. law helps. What about the tens of thousands who got their hours cut because of 0bamaCare? What about the thousands flat-out laid off? What about the MILLIONS who will have their deductibles and monthly fees jacked up higher than 0bama's nose in the air, because of it?
If four is all you have then piss on those four. Socialists should be well versed in the "not for the individual, but for the collective" groupthink.
Like most COBRA participants Jessica Stephens, a 29-year-old Chicagoan, pays the full cost of insurance sponsored by her former employer—$518 a month. Most employers include a 2 percent administrative fee.Stephens, who now makes about $25,000 working as a cook at a restaurant that doesn’t offer insurance, says she took a part-time job to pay her COBRA bill. She’s likely to qualify for exchange tax credits that would allow her to buy a policy starting in January for less than $200 a month.
“That’s wonderful. I would definitely take the exchange” once it becomes available, she said. “I thought I could squeeze by financially doing COBRA, but the last nine months have told me that’s not possible.”
Diving Mullah
You mean the millions of workers that got their hours cut because of the Bush recession don't you? Because the rate has been falling since 2009 so Obamacare has nothing to do with it.
PPACA is a terrible policy, no matter how many times you repeat the phrase to yourself in your head "it's all because of Bush's Recession, it's all because of Bush's Recession."
Read the graph if you are so smart. Lying about it will not make it fail, no matter how hard you try.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?