Boo Radley
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2009
- Messages
- 37,066
- Reaction score
- 7,028
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
At one time that was probably true, however, in today's market the only benefit I can actually say they provide their workers is that job security that others don't have, but they do it at the expense of future generation have the opportunity of having that job due to the fact that todays union thugs act more like petulant children screaming mine, mine, mine, and more, more, more....
They are the new dinosaur that is on its way out.
j-mac
Thanks !!! you gave me my laffer for the day, but you do owe me for a keyboard since I spit my coffee all over mine.
You NEVER answer, you obfuscate, change the subject, bring up strawmen, and accuse others of doing exactly what you do. And besides that, you obviously are having problems following discussions as evidenced by your comments above.
In other words, you have become one of the most hyperpartisan hacks on this board.
Making a "good wage" at the expense of expanded job force, and a current employee pool that works to the least productive level without fear of losing their job is what produced this turd
j-mac
That's your opinion, but even job security in today's world is worth something. Giving busniess all the cards will not make things better. Again, the only way to appease business enough, espeically big busniess, is to work for nothing, do away with benefits, and pay them to stay. There's a book by a former Michigna governor I heard about last, showing that giving business everything didn't work. They left anyway. But, I'll look for that later.
The fact is demonizing workers who tried to work together to make things better, while ignoring the greed and poor decisions of business says somethign about the person doing that than it does unions. Tone it down a bit. Quit seeing everyone who sees it differently as the enemy or crooks or any other such label.
How the hell does Obama know how high is too high? :lamo
Why is there the little green emoticon at the end of a rather ridiculous and terrible unfunny statement?
What you do not seem to get is that WORK RULES are more of a reason why unions have fallen out of favor. You want to make this about wages only which I think you know is untrue.
Work rules are like government regulations. By that I mean we certainly need some so business does not get out of control. However it is also important to understand that we need sensible regulations or work rules, make sure that we make sure the rules are followed. But if in the case of business it creates to much featherbedding then it works for neither the company nor the worker long term.
Aww, don't get snarky professor....It doesn't suit you well. The fact remains that UAW bloat, and golden pension systems are strangling the company. Unions are for that part of the work force that could never succeed on their own without protection.
j-mac
It was conservatives of the time who wanted the status quo, it was the liberals who sought revolution.Interesting. Based on your arguments I believe you would have opposed the first American revolution. I know you will oppose the second one. But that is where your arguments ultimately take us. If there is not redress, of there is no stepping back from disaster then disaster will come.
It was the Wall Street gang who brought our economy to near collapse, just like in 1929.That is his goal. It is a tenet of Marxism to wreck capitalism with steeply progressive taxation. Guess what the one term Marxist president continues to propose?
Socialist utopia can only come after all are made uniformly miserable. The dictatorship of the proles will endure forever.
You talk about facts, but you haven't given any. How about this source?First of all, this opinion that you have posted from Media Matters of all places, is the view of the liberal progressive left in this country, and we know that. Nothing new in that, and nothing to back up their assertion that Cap Gains cuts, or Corporate tax relief would only be short term, in fact just the opposite.
The CBO, although being quoted in true cherry pick fashion by both sides, is as a matter of actual fact often wrong in their assertions due to the fact that the way they are set up to score certain things boxes them in to only the information that any given side of the argument gives them, and can not make their own true evaluation through independent research.
Now, Media Matters well known for cherry picking, and completely out of context argument purposely swayed against anything not in the progressive wheelhouse is disconcerting that anyone would post from them honestly.
It would be to me like taking something from an opinion based right wing source, and passing it off as fact based, like say from the American Thinker. I like their articles, but they are opinion, and should be represented as such.
The other end of that argument that I detest these days is the fallacy of the infallable un named generalization. So before you throw out there that "many", or "most" agree with ANYTHING you have to type in defense of your class war division of this country, know that it is crap before you start.
So stick to facts, and we will all be better for it....Thanks.
j-mac
remind me of your experience and dealing with capital gains income PB
Conservative/libertarians think low wages make a thriving economy - it does just the opposite.if making a good wage and getting decent benefits is 'mediocre'...ok, i'm cool with that....UAW AND PROUD OF IT
Conservative/libertarians think low wages make a thriving economy - it does just the opposite.
I think he is laughing at the incredible ineptness of boy blunder-Obumble the magic Kenyan
SC must be a right-to-work-for-less state.Unions clearly were a benefit until they became a hindrance. Pendulums seem to swing to far in either direction. The problem seems to be less about salary and benefits and more about work rules. The new Boeing plant in SC as I understand it paid essentially the same think as the union plant.
President Barack Obama is neither a "boy" nor a Kenyan.
President Barack Obama is neither a "boy" nor a Kenyan.
It's a shame that has to be said to anyone.
feigned indignation, the last refuge of the sanctimonious left?
It's a shame that has to be said to anyone.
Sending jobs overseas make corporate profits higher/CEO's compensation bigger. Retail prices of products sold is determined by supply and demand principles.nah liberals want artificially high wages for union members at the expense of others
unsustainable wages that send jobs overseas
SC must be a right-to-work-for-less state.
Nothing feigned. I find it sad you had to be told. That's plain and simple.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?