you have missed every one of his current campaign ads?
wow
that is because you believe in FROM EACH ACCORDING TO THEIR ABILITY
I do not
I think taxes should be based on what you get for what you pay more than how much you can afford
and if those who demand much government actually had to pay more for that, they might stop demanding so much government
I am merely asking you to give us the quotes so we an check for the allegation of demonization. As I stated, I suspect you are confusing the hyperbolic over the top charge of demonization with a simply difference of opinion about economic policy.
Yeah. I'll be sure to mention that my friend who is working (39 hours a week at minimum wage) and has to receive foodstamps so she can feed her children. Quit stereotyping everyone who benefits from government assistance and you might actually be able to see them as human beings rather than the human garbage that you seem to imply they are.
Yeah. I'll be sure to mention that my friend who is working (39 hours a week at minimum wage) and has to receive foodstamps so she can feed her children. Quit stereotyping everyone who benefits from government assistance and you might actually be able to see them as human beings rather than the human garbage that you seem to imply they are.
Yes. Those are indeed articles.
And just what in there supports a charge of demonization of success rather than a difference of position on economic policy?
Call it what you will. Perhaps you should write to clinton and he can explain the meaning it "it".
What you fail to understand is the Republican minority leaders Sen. Mitch McConnell and Rep. John Boehner have made their mission not to compromise on ANYTHING that Obama proposes, says or does even when he proposes their own bills and things they have voted for in the past because as McConnell puts it, ""the single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president." To achieve their goal they are even willing to destroy the economy. Romney didn't have that problem because Democrats are more willing to compromise. Obama is true leader, Republicans are true traitors.No, what I am saying is that a true leader can find a way to work with his whole team. Not a dem or republican thing.
What most on this site do not understand is that the best CEOs work with and take the advise of the people working for them. This basic concept of good business, or good anything is what Obama seems to lack any understanding of.
And you see Obama as good at that? Compromising?
You sound sooo confused -- I lauded nothing.No. I just think it funny how far people will go. Even so far as lauding that which they personally oppose.
Business can, does, has and will exist and thrive with or without govt. It's that simple.
Does that mean there is no place for govt? Hell no, but the govt Obama wants is not the govt that got America where it is. Obama wants the kind of govt that is destroying Europe.
...Hell no, but the govt Obama wants is not the govt that got America where it is. Obama wants the kind of govt that is destroying Europe.
You sound sooo confused -- I lauded nothing.
I asked if businesses in the U.S. could thrive without the military to secure the nation?
A question which has endured several strawmen thrown at it, yet it remains unanswered.
I know what the answer is, don't you??
There is no evidence for that.
I at least saw some effort. I saw republicans saying the number one priority was to make sure he failed. However, to be clear, I don't think this problem is limitied to one party. Both aprties suffer from it, and noth bases see the word as a dirty word. They are all wrong IMHO.
No leader can work with a political party which publicly takes the stated position of blocking every one of said leader's actions,No, what I am saying is that a true leader can find a way to work with his whole team. Not a dem or republican thing.
What most on this site do not understand is that the best CEOs work with and take the advise of the people working for them. This basic concept of good business, or good anything is what Obama seems to lack any understanding of.
How much compromise with Republicans went into Obamacare?
How much compromise with Republicans went into Obamacare?
Well the public option....
You don't even know that "citing" something is not necessarily "lauding" it, do you?You did, you cited something you oppose as the reason for success.
You couldn't be more wrong. U.S. businesses would last only until we got invaded.And I answered it. Business would exist in this country regardless of its govt or the military that protects it.
The entire Mandate is a republicna idea. But let's not forget, republicans were invited, but once they stated clearly they were only interested in seeing Obama fail, then and only then were they excluded. What happened is what happened. They could have come to the table in earnest. If they had, I'd have been with them. But they did not. What little effort there was came from Obama.
You don't even know that "citing" something is not necessarily "lauding" it, do you?
Also, you still have no idea what I said. That is evidenced by this post of yours. I never said U.S. businesses are successful because of the U.S. military. I'm also not against the U.S. military, as you keep saying.
You couldn't be more wrong. U.S. businesses would last only until we got invaded.
The Mandate was an idea of a Republican, shot down by all the other Republicans.
why did she have more than one child if she is only capable of a minimum wage job
tell me why I have a duty to be taxed more and more because she wants more government (or you want more government for her)
I think the garbage are people who demand I have to pay more taxes so they can keep getting more and more votes or handouts
not people who have bad luck
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?