EpicDude86
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2009
- Messages
- 4,384
- Reaction score
- 822
- Location
- Epic Mountain
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Define "public"?
The civil courts are granted broad restrictions on media access.
The military courts are even more secure.
Not that it matters, the evidence makes this a slam dunk for the prosecution.
Then we hang the terrorist.
Question:
Why is it that all those people who bitch and moan about how racist the United States is in their eyes refuse to move to whatever country they feel is better? Lord knows that we racists don't want their useless asses around here, so why don't they go where they'll be more comfortable?
6th Amendment said:In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial
That's a good point, since this is technically wartime, can his trial (is it a Court Martial by the way?) be restricted to certain parties or is it still required to be a Public Trial?
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial.
When was war declared by Congress?
That's a good point, since this is technically wartime, can his trial (is it a Court Martial by the way?) be restricted to certain parties or is it still required to be a Public Trial?
LOL - it's funny when the shoe is on the other foot - I remember when the liberals were ranting about Bush absorbing the moment when he was informed of 9/11 during a reading to school kids.
Bush didn't want to fly off and scare the kids, and news like that can momentarily stun a good man.
He did what was needed within minutes later.
NOBAMA has dithered since April with Gen. McChrystal's request, and we will never hear the truth told about the Fort Hood matter from him.
Fortunately for us, we have a brain of our own, and we know the truth of matters.
My only sad is the law didn't allow us to vote Bush in for another term.
Romney in 2012 is what this world needs.
Isn't the 2001 War in Afghanistan still technically ongoing or did we not declare war there? I know it's more of an informal conflict...But I can't find any solid looking sources...would the Dept of the State have that info?
Feel free to do a search and find where I have said anything l have aid anything like that. In point of fact, you will find that not only do I say that not only was 9/11 not Bush's fault, but that he handled it well. Don't go and make up crap to try and make your mindless anti rants seem of value. They are not, and once again, you take your post in a direction totally unrelated to the topic at hand. You don't like Obama, and you let it blind you.
The far right like to claim that any one who dares support Obama has "drank the koolaid", but the truth is, you and those like you who will use any excuse to mindlessly rant are much more the koolaid drinkers than those of us who sit back and actually think about things and judge each thing individually.
This guy was his own little terrorist group, and you don't want to face it. The guy even had business cards. Keep your head in the sand.Feel free to do a search and find where I have said anything l have aid anything like that. In point of fact, you will find that not only do I say that not only was 9/11 not Bush's fault, but that he handled it well. Don't go and make up crap to try and make your mindless anti rants seem of value. They are not, and once again, you take your post in a direction totally unrelated to the topic at hand. You don't like Obama, and you let it blind you.
The far right like to claim that any one who dares support Obama has "drank the koolaid", but the truth is, you and those like you who will use any excuse to mindlessly rant are much more the koolaid drinkers than those of us who sit back and actually think about things and judge each thing individually.
War has not been declared by Congress. It kinda is a nit picky thing
The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.
Isn't the 2001 War in Afghanistan still technically ongoing or did we not declare war there? I know it's more of an informal conflict...But I can't find any solid looking sources...would the Dept of the State have that info?
This guy was his own little terrorist group, and you don't want to face it. The guy even had business cards. Keep your head in the sand.
This is just sickening as well as extremely stupid.
How long is 'some time'?Lets get back on topic.
Today Major Hasan officially charged with 13 counts of premeditated murder. So this indicates that prosecuters do not believe he just snaped. He had been planning these attacks for some time.
Ft. Hood suspect charged; Obama orders review of intelligence
I do not believe it will be on TV. It will be held in a military court of law, afterall he was in the miltary and commited crimes against the miltary.
As far as it being open to the public - I doubt it - and if it is obviously it will have to be limited.
As for the evidence - guilty as charged - they have more than enough to find him guilty, and obviously, that's because he is guilty.
Like they say - if you can't do the time, don't do the crime.
This guy was his own little terrorist group, and you don't want to face it. The guy even had business cards. Keep your head in the sand.
This guy was a mass murderer with religious tendencies. There's a difference. He's as much a terrorist as the guy who shot up the gym in Pittsburgh.
If he was really planning a terrorist act, he had the opportunity to do far worse damage. Majors are not frisked, their cars are not inspected. He could have detonated a device near a large gathering of troops, a meeting of general staff, or a presidential visit. How much planning does it require to walk into a room with guns blazing?
The FBI defines terrorism as:
"The unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a Government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives."
Planned to do this in the summer but figure to stick around to see the election outcome. This particular one got so much attention and I was just curious. Not like I give a flying fcuk who won, since this exit plan was already planned. Good luck to Obama! He will be successful. The liberal media LOVES him. Amerika has chosen The Black Man. Good! In light of this I got ideas outside of Obama’s plans for the economy and such. Here it is: Every black man should get a young white girl hoe to hone up on. Kinda a reverse indentured servitude thing. Long ago, many a older white male landowner had a young Negro wench girl for his desires. Bout’ time tables are turned on that ****. Besides, dem young white hoez dig da bruthrs! LOL. More so than they dig the white dudes! Every daddy know when he sends his little girl to college, she be bangin a bruthr real good. I saw it. “Not my little girl”, daddy says! (Yeah right!!) Black dudes have thier choice of best white hoez. You do the math, there are enough young white so all the brothers can each have one for 3 or 6 months or so.
Frequently the Oklahoma City Bombing is characterized as an act of domestic terrorism, so why wouldn't this act
I'm still more upset that the warning signs were there, were ignored, and this unstable person was promoted --- all because of perceived sensitivities to Muslims. I find that unacceptable and his chain of command need a good shellacking.
This guy was a mass murderer with religious tendencies. There's a difference. He's as much a terrorist as the guy who shot up the gym in Pittsburgh.
I guess it's just a coincidence that he glorified and justified suicide bombings. That he carried around business cards with Soldier of Allah inscribed on them. That he said that Muslims should murder Americans. That he stood up and yelled the Jihadist battle cry of Allahu Akbar before he began opening fire. I guess, also, that it's just a coincidence that two of the 9-11 hijackers attended the same Mosque as Nidal under the tutelage of the radical wahhabist Imam Anwar al Awlaki who himself was under investigation by the FBI before he fled to Yemen. This is the same Imam who has since praised the fort hood attacker as a "a hero," and that he "is a man of conscience who could not bear living the contradiction of being a Muslim and serving in an army that is fighting against his own people." And that's not all folks, this is the very same Imam who Nidal emailed up to 20 times before the deadly attack. It should be clear to anyone by now that this was a Jihadist attack inspired by radical Islamist ideology and not simply a guy who snapped.
According to liberlism, terrorism doesn't exist. So, thus the arguing over whether Hasan was a terrorist. We say he is, they say he isn't.
Well he didn't get outside the post gates, right?Except, I'm not a liberal. I fully believe that terrorism exists, and that radicalized Islam is a huge problem. I just don't think that this incident meets the litmus test. But thanks for trying.
:2wave:
Well he didn't get outside the post gates, right?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?