• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama on pot: 'I don't think it is more dangerous than alcohol'......

I am as serious as a heart attack when you're in the middle of the Sahara desert.

I think you and Adolf could have been good pals. He was on board with extermination tactics.
 
Yep, along with probably most elected officials here in the United States.



Not really. They don't have the same visual effect on the rest of the population that dead bodies laying in the street does.

You do have a solution to the overpopulation problem.
 
Would you prefer if he set an example of lying?

Well, he already has multiple times in fact but lying about pot use personal or otherwise would not benefit him politically.
 
Shooting people is a means to: a. Ensure there are no repeat offenders. b. Show others the consequences of making the same mistake. & c. Work towards getting people to turn offenders in before they get executed for being an accessory to possession, sale, etc....

So how did it work out in the places it has been tried?
 
All Moral crimes (anything that involves drugs, alcohol, violent behavior, or fraud) would be treated that way.

Failure to report suspected abuse, does that earn a bullet to the head? Failure to report a suspected drug deal you witnesses gets you put up against the wall? These are moral decision.
 
I think you and Adolf could have been good pals. He was on board with extermination tactics.

Not really. His criteria for the use of force were way off.


You do have a solution to the overpopulation problem.

Probably. As well as a solution for a lot of the urban blight that would end up being burned down when it was siezed from these people.
 
Failure to report suspected abuse, does that earn a bullet to the head? Failure to report a suspected drug deal you witnesses gets you put up against the wall? These are moral decision.

Not so much "failure to report" as supporting individuals who are found guilty. The cops bust in the door of mom and dad's place and end up finding the son guilty. If there's anything found in the house (as compared to on the son's person), then they're guilty of supporting him by allowing him to live their. Even if they aren't shot (depending on the likelihood they knew about it), the house is going up in smoke.
 
Not so much "failure to report" as supporting individuals who are found guilty. The cops bust in the door of mom and dad's place and end up finding the son guilty. If there's anything found in the house (as compared to on the son's person), then they're guilty of supporting him by allowing him to live their. Even if they aren't shot (depending on the likelihood they knew about it), the house is going up in smoke.

Well it's a good thing the laws will eventually be changed so we don't need to worry about just shooting everyone!
 
Well it's a good thing the laws will eventually be changed so we don't need to worry about just shooting everyone!

Regardless of what the city, county, state, or federal laws say it will NEVER be legal in my vehicle or on my property. Individuals who choose to disregard that will find themselves in an unpleasant situation. I've already got two (future) brothers-in-law who won't come to my condo because they're afraid I will narc them out if they show up.
 
Regardless of what the city, county, state, or federal laws say it will NEVER be legal in my vehicle or on my property. Individuals who choose to disregard that will find themselves in an unpleasant situation. I've already got two (future) brothers-in-law who won't come to my condo because they're afraid I will narc them out if they show up.

Are they afraid you might shoot them as well?
 
Are they afraid you might shoot them as well?

I don't think either one of them is bright enough to have put 2+2 together and gotten 4 on that yet. They are aware that I am a firearm owner and that I have no use for the crap on my property. Both of them have (so far) been smart enough to avoid the situation, but I'm not certain their combined intelligence is sufficient to reach the conclusion that even if/when it's legal it won't be in my home and that I do have ways to back that up.
 
The US Constitution ceased to have any value in April of 1865. It really hadn't had any value since April of 1861 when Mister Lincoln took it to the outhouse and used it to wipe his arse, but 1865 is when it ceased to have any meaning whatsoever.

You intrigue me.
 
I don't think either one of them is bright enough to have put 2+2 together and gotten 4 on that yet. They are aware that I am a firearm owner and that I have no use for the crap on my property. Both of them have (so far) been smart enough to avoid the situation, but I'm not certain their combined intelligence is sufficient to reach the conclusion that even if/when it's legal it won't be in my home and that I do have ways to back that up.

LOL We also have laws to prevent you from behaving that way or face life in prison. You can make friends with all the drug dealers while you are there.
 
I don't think either one of them is bright enough to have put 2+2 together and gotten 4 on that yet. They are aware that I am a firearm owner and that I have no use for the crap on my property. Both of them have (so far) been smart enough to avoid the situation, but I'm not certain their combined intelligence is sufficient to reach the conclusion that even if/when it's legal it won't be in my home and that I do have ways to back that up.

If they wind up dead, you'd better hope that the cops don't get hold of this thread and link you to it.
 
LOL We also have laws to prevent you from behaving that way or face life in prison. You can make friends with all the drug dealers while you are there.

If they wind up dead, you'd better hope that the cops don't get hold of this thread and link you to it.

You gentlemen make the mistake of believing I'd allow myself to be taken alive in such a circumstance. I have zero faith in the US Legal System and I lose even more of it on a daily basis. It would be quite a thing to see, were I ever to be forced into a courtroom as a defendant, which is why I prefer to place myself in the hands of a much Higher Court, if it were to come to that.
 
You gentlemen make the mistake of believing I'd allow myself to be taken alive in such a circumstance. I have zero faith in the US Legal System and I lose even more of it on a daily basis. It would be quite a thing to see, were I ever to be forced into a courtroom as a defendant, which is why I prefer to place myself in the hands of a much Higher Court, if it were to come to that.

Either way we won't have to worry abut you anymore. And your fate will serve as a reminder to others.
 
You gentlemen make the mistake of believing I'd allow myself to be taken alive in such a circumstance. I have zero faith in the US Legal System and I lose even more of it on a daily basis. It would be quite a thing to see, were I ever to be forced into a courtroom as a defendant, which is why I prefer to place myself in the hands of a much Higher Court, if it were to come to that.
We may be reading about you one day in the press, or hearing about it on TV.
 
Well he did say it was very healthy.....huh?

Looks like he said 'it's NOT very healthy' to me.

WHere do you see otherwise?
 
As I said in the other thread about this, I don't like the president minimizing m/j use, like it's no big deal, especially for kids.

It is no big deal and he did not minimize it re: kids.
 
Back
Top Bottom