Boo Radley
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2009
- Messages
- 37,066
- Reaction score
- 7,028
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Waiting for you to prove me wrong and that I ran when that happened.
You have to love these guys.....Obama is responsible for all of Bush's failures.
Clinton is responsible for the worst attack on our country that occurred on Bush's watch....oh...and Bush deserves credit for capturing and killing Osama Bin Laden despite the fact that he didn't really spend any time thinking about him or going after him.
Its all gamemanship to the wingers.
if i could give multiple likes on this, i would.:mrgreen:
I will never accept the statement that tax cuts are an expense to the govt.
I will never accept the statement that tax cuts are an expense to the govt. I posted the line item expenses of the govt. and tax cuts isn't there.
The only spending problem we have is around the military industrial complex.
If those funds were "redistributed" back into Treasury to pay for extended tax cuts or extended unemployment benefits, I'd say both were valid expenditures under present day economic circumstances.
I've never heard anybody up against a budget say "I need to cut out food, clothing and shelter, but I refuse to look for a part-time job to supplement what we have coming in."
You mean that city in CA, governed by a republican inseminator?
Isn't sticking your fingers in your ears and going nanananana running? When have you ever addressed an actual point? Yep, hello pot. :coffeepap
I've never heard anybody up against a budget say "I need to cut out food, clothing and shelter, but I refuse to look for a part-time job to supplement what we have coming in."
Jesus Christ seemed to think so
I will never accept the statement that tax cuts are an expense to the govt. I posted the line item expenses of the govt. and tax cuts isn't there. Tax cuts give people more spendable income and that scares the hell out of liberals. It makes economic growth easier because of consumer spending which always happens when people have more spendable income. GDP growth means more tax revenue and more employees. Happens every time unless there are economic conditions that prevent it, i.e. recessions, 9/11, and the financial crisis.
Please provide a quote from the Bible where Jesus said that government should tax people for the purpose of welfare programs?
Borrow and spend was the republican policy under bush*. Now that we have a dem president, borrow and spend is suddenly A Very Bad Thing
I have addressed every point you ever made even though most of them are biased, off based, and contrary to reality. Nice attempt however to derail this thread. I back up my posts with facts that are verifiable. Noticed you and every other liberal here running from the data. Not surprising, those facts cannot be refuted.
Huh? I believe the mayor of Los Angeles is a Democrat.
Antonio Villaraigosa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please provide a quote from the Bible where Jesus said that government should tax people for the purpose of welfare programs?
There someone found it for you... Puts your chart in perspective, no?
comedic gold, i tell ya, comedic gold!!:lamo :lamo :lamo
If only you had. If only you had, mr. Pot. :coffeepap
I DON'T have a problem with tax cuts provide they are done in the right way. Currently, I don't think they're having the net redeeming value most would like to think they do. The prime example would be our current economic state.
YES, we've had to spend alot of money in the last 2.5-3 years, but the reason(s) for that were made very clear - Corporate America created a financial mess they could not get themselves out of and WE, the taxpayers, bailed them out. It was because of their excessive greed that nearly brought our financial system to a complete halt! It was their wrecklessness that cost this country millions of jobs. Yet, what exactly is Corporate America doing now? Building their balance sheets and personal financial portfolios back up while everyone else waits...in unemployment lines.
Those who blindly support capitalism and the free market system, look at what your blind faith as brought us too? And no. I am not anti-business nor anti-rich. I do not begrudge what the wealthiest among us have achieved. I do, however, have a problem with the irresponsiblity of it all, as well as the lack of accountability. It's like many among the wealthy who caused this mess got their money from the Treasury and gave the rest of us the finger.
I know that the Gropenator was a republican
Christianity is built on free will and not forced redistribution. Liberals always confuse that fact and believe Jesus would force people to give to someone else. Free will promotes people doing the right thing and the fact that there are consequences for failure.
No, Obama wasn't the one who ran up the debt. Obama just has to pay the interest on the republican debt.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?