• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama: No Deal Without Tax Hikes

Status
Not open for further replies.

Get someone to read the line item budget I posted. here is the 2008 budget. I pulled out the 2009 budget because it included TARP and some of the stimulus along with other Obama supplementals

Defense 696.1 616.1
International Affairs 45.2 28.9
Gen. Science, Space 30.9 27.8
Energy 11.5 ..5
Natural resources/env 41.6 31.9
Agriculture 23.2 18.4
Commerce 30.1 27.7
Transportation 92.5 77.6
Community Dev 24.5 23.9
Education/Train/Social 125.1 90.9
Health 369.0 280.7
Medicare 451.6 390.8
Income Security 624.0 427.4
Social Security 706.7 617.0
Veterans Benefits 108.4 84.6
Justice 55.2 47.1
General Govt. 18.1 20.3
Net Interest 196.9 252.8


Total 3650.6 3063.9


Are you ever going to respond to the tough questions asked of you? Doubt it so carry on with posting misinformation and false information
 
from Conservative

Really!!!!!!!!!!!

The full faith and credit of the United States of America means nothing to you?

The treasury notes held mean nothing to you?

What kind of American patriot are you anyways?

Huh? Being irresponsible is now patriotic? Pshaw!
 

My apologies...

It's just that at first-read, the way you worded your statement made it seem as if you were trying to say that TARP was enacted under Obama (again). Next time, I'll try to read slower, deal?

As to your question, "Where did all the repaid TARP money go?" Treasury, I suppose, to get redistrubted elsewhere. Where exactly, I don't know. You'd have to ask Geithner, Bernanke or Congress about that.
 
Bush was at fault for Taarp 1, obama was at fault for all that came after. This isn't really hard. :doh




Hey, when does it become Obama's fault for not fixing this mess?

No, Obama wasn't the one who ran up the debt. Obama just has to pay the interest on the republican debt.
 

Paid back or not, it was still included in your #'s. And TARP included spending in FY2010
 

No problem, thanks for the apology. The point I was making with regard to the repayment of TARP is that it should have gone back to reducing the deficit but didn't. You are right, it was redistributed elsewhere showing that obama has an addiction to spending.
 
Why should I pay for your police? For you fire department? C'mon Con....why should I pay for your libraries or your parks?

You don't pay for mine. You pay for yours.
 

It's all about winning for them. Like this guy

 
I'm not reading every article you throw at me.

your loss, more power to you

Are you arguing that I'm not correct?

no, cuomo is

except he's not so much arguing as acting

and rahm the ram, governor omalley, governor malloy, governor moonbeam, the state assemblies in springfield and boston and trenton, the emergency managers of detroit...

everyone's cutting, no one's taxing

maybe you could write em a letter

since you don't want to read
 
The only two massive spending measure that can be directly attributed to Pres. Obama would be the Stimulus and unemployment insurance extension (and the extension of the Bush tax cuts, if we can all agree that tax cuts in a recession cost the Treasury money because they aren't paid for when running deficits).
 
You don't pay for mine. You pay for yours.

Amazing how Disneydude ran when proven wrong. A liberal can never admit when wrong. Barack Obama has an ideology that mirrors many here but the fact is that Obama nor those here can admit what that ideology is, cradle to grave coverage by a massive central govt. That hope and change message was misinterpreted by many in the electorate that voted for him but not by many here who want a European socialist economy because most apparently cannot make it on their own.
 

Just pointing out that it was bush* who is mostly responsible for the out of control spending because he never even tried to control the spending.
 

Hello pot.
 

What do I care what Cuomo is doing in New York or Rahm is doing in Chicago? I don't live there. We're talking about national politics and you're changing the subject because you know I've boxed you into a corner. You know that it is necessary to increase revenues if you aren't making enough money. You just don't want to admit it.
 

I will never accept the statement that tax cuts are an expense to the govt. I posted the line item expenses of the govt. and tax cuts isn't there. Tax cuts give people more spendable income and that scares the hell out of liberals. It makes economic growth easier because of consumer spending which always happens when people have more spendable income. GDP growth means more tax revenue and more employees. Happens every time unless there are economic conditions that prevent it, i.e. recessions, 9/11, and the financial crisis.
 

If those funds were "redistributed" back into Treasury to pay for extended tax cuts or extended unemployment benefits, I'd say both were valid expenditures under present day economic circumstances.
 

It did go back into reducing the deficit, but that won't show on a chart that only shows SPENDING.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…