Jesus Christ thought so?
Another reason why Leftists are seldom sought out for their opinions on Christian teachings.
Fiscal years go from October 1 of one year onto September 30 of the following year. Therefore, FY2009 began on October 1, 2008. And when was TARP enacted?
Wanna try that one again?
There someone found it for you... Puts your chart in perspective, no?
That's good because that's not what you asked me and not what I answered.
Using the historical record like that is ... well .... is that allowed here?
Yes, it shows the massive deficits in FY2010 caused by repubican legislation passed the previous year and signed by bush*
Jesus Christ thought so?
Another reason why Leftists are seldom sought out for their opinions on Christian teachings.
Delusional appears to be a constant state with your side.
Why is it that those who most often profess to be "Christian" are the ones who know the least about the man?
/facepalm
Democrats control the purse strings, Obama was one of those democrats. and it's still going up up up....
bush* was president. He signed it.
So it was Obamas' fault :roll:
We will also discuss the economic policies of the right, which got us into this mess.
Um, you do both, if you know anything about business.
Objective Voice;1059665341]Fiscal years go from October 1 of one year onto September 30 of the following year. Therefore, FY2009 began on October 1, 2008. And when was TARP enacted?
Wanna try that one again?
Or your military, which is where most of our tax money goes
bush* was president. He signed it.
So it was Obamas' fault :roll:
1) a budget has two sides to it
2) deal with both sides
/facepalm
Democrats control the purse strings, Obama was one of those democrats. and it's still going up up up....
Obama hasn't put spending steroids, that's a fallacious argument, however Bush 43 did put spending on steroids - big time. Bush's last budget was 2009, not 2008 as you keep saying. The reason tax revenues went up after Reagan's tax adjustments was inflation that started in earnest during Ford's administration got worse during Carter's and partially through Reagan's administration. Wages were so low by comparison they had to be raised by the nation's employers. Higher wages mean more tax revenue for the government. Reagan gave the biggest tax breaks to the wealthy - the top marginal rate was lowered from 70% to 50%.So because President's Reagan and Both Bushs spent plenty that gives Obama the right to put that spending on steroids? Obama's 2010 budget was 700 billion more than the Bush 2008 budget. You don't seem to get it, we have a spending problem not a tax problem. It has been posted many times FIT revenue went up AFTER the Reagan and Bush tax cuts but in your world you have no problem raising taxes with 24 plus million unemployed or unemployed Americans and supposedly giving more money to the politicians that have given us a 14.4 trillion dollar debt. That doesn't make any sense and is purely the liberal ideology. Have you ever looked at the budget of the United States? Try it some times and tell me why the Federal Govt. spends as much as it does and what can be cut and do that before buying the political rhetoric that we need more taxes.
When you have a budget problem do you first find a way to raise more revenue or do you check what expenses can be cut? Stop with the ideological rants and think.
cuomo doesn't know anything about business, rahm the ram doesn't know business?
California budget: Democrats pass austerity budget - Los Angeles Times
Cuomo budget: $10 billion deficit cut, no new taxes, layoffs likely
Jerry Brown Budget Cuts | California budget: Gov. Jerry Brown approves cuts to services for poor, sick and elderly - Los Angeles Times
MA House votes to restrict unions - Boston.com
New Jersey Assembly Passes Bill That Requires Public Workers' Unions To Pay More For Benefits - WPIX
Emanuel Unveils Major Budget Cut On First Full Day « CBS Chicago
Governor Pat Quinn signs Illinois education reform bill into law, new rules effect school days, teacher strikes, tenure | abc7chicago.com
Detroit Moves Against Unions - WSJ.com
Union Deal Defeated; Gov. Malloy Pledges To Cut State Workers - CTnow
Rahm Emanuel sends layoff notices to city workers in union showdown - Chicago Sun-Times
I've told you this before, I'm not reading every article you throw at me. But it's common sense that if your business is suffering losses, you don't just cut your expenses, you look at ways to increase your revenue as well. This is seriously Business 101. Are you arguing that I'm not correct?
Is it unreasonable to ask for some tax hikes if you've already put $4 trillion in spending cuts on the table?
You have to love these guys.....Obama is responsible for all of Bush's failures.
Clinton is responsible for the worst attack on our country that occurred on Bush's watch....oh...and Bush deserves credit for capturing and killing Osama Bin Laden despite the fact that he didn't really spend any time thinking about him or going after him.
Its all gamemanship to the wingers.
TARP was passed under bush* and the spending was included in FY2010
I'm not sure he always read those either
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?