• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama - Biblically Hostile President

Logicman

Logicman

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
23,086
Reaction score
2,376
Location
United States
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
Obama - America's Most Biblically-Hostile U.S. President

WallBuilders - Issues and Articles - America’s Most Biblically-Hostile U. S. President

Not only is Obama's theology screwed up, but so is his presidency. He's Biblically-challenged, on the wrong side of the issues of abortion and gay marriage, and is a serial liar. More than that, his 'redistribution of wealth scheme is unbiblical.

This thread is for debate and discussion on these and other related issues.
 
He isnt Jesus .:2razz:
 
Logicman said:
Obama - America's Most Biblically-Hostile U.S. President

WallBuilders - Issues and Articles - America’s Most Biblically-Hostile U. S. President

Not only is Obama's theology screwed up, but so is his presidency. He's Biblically-challenged, on the wrong side of the issues of abortion and gay marriage, and is a serial liar. More than that, his 'redistribution of wealth scheme is unbiblical.

This thread is for debate and discussion on these and other related issues.
Click to expand...

More unsubstantiated opinion from the ahem Logicman.

Why do you always use a shot gun to start a thread? Are you intentionally sabotaging it by making about multiple topics?

Pick one of the 7 subjects you bring up and discuss it.
 
The constitution prohibits our government from enforcing any religion over the people. The president swears an oath to uphold and defend that constitution. Being biblically hostile is part of the job.
 
Paschendale said:
The constitution prohibits our government from enforcing any religion over the people. The president swears an oath to uphold and defend that constitution. Being biblically hostile is part of the job.
Click to expand...

Nope.

In the landmark case School District of Abington Township v. Schempp, the U.S. Supreme Court recognized that "the State may not establish a 'religion of secularism' in the sense of affirmatively opposing or showing hostility to religion, thus 'preferring those who believe in no religion over those who do believe." - Sch. Dist. of Abington Twp. v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203, 225 (1963)
 
Utter BS. Secularism is embodied in a non-religious government. You may prefer a theocracy, but the USA was founded to get away from exactly that.
 
Logicman said:
Obama - America's Most Biblically-Hostile U.S. President

WallBuilders - Issues and Articles - America’s Most Biblically-Hostile U. S. President

Not only is Obama's theology screwed up, but so is his presidency. He's Biblically-challenged, on the wrong side of the issues of abortion and gay marriage, and is a serial liar. More than that, his 'redistribution of wealth scheme is unbiblical.

This thread is for debate and discussion on these and other related issues.
Click to expand...

Before Obama was president we did not have such issues as deflategate! Gee thanks Obama...
 
Redress said:
Can you explain why some book written by old guys thousands of years ago should even be referenced by 21st century politicians?
Click to expand...

Well, for one thing it tells people to speak the truth. If Obama had taken that to heart he wouldn't be known as such a bald-faced, serial liar.

And there's scores of endearing and enduring principles like that in the Bible.

Besides, try busting the resurrection accounts sometime. If you can't you'd better give your life to Jesus.

By the way, did you bother to read the article I posted on Obama vs. the Bible - Redistribution of Wealth? You might be surprised to find out why it's bad for America. So expand your horizons.
 
Logicman said:
Well, for one thing it tells people to speak the truth. If Obama had taken that to heart he wouldn't be known as such a bald-faced, serial liar.

And there's scores of endearing and enduring principles like that in the Bible.

Besides, try busting the resurrection accounts sometime. If you can't you'd better give your life to Jesus.

By the way, did you bother to read the article I posted on Obama vs. the Bible - Redistribution of Wealth? You might be surprised to find out why it's bad for America. So expand your horizons.
Click to expand...

Turns out that "bald-faced, serial liar" tells the truth an awful lot...

All True statements involving Barack Obama | PolitiFact
All Mostly True statements involving Barack Obama | PolitiFact

That is better than most politicians.

And do you know who else besides that old book endorse telling the truth? Well, just about every single person. In fact, picking just one person at slightly less than random, Karl Marx espoused the importance of truth. So that old book is kinda like Karl Marx. Think about that awhile. Maybe you will see that big flaw in your logic...
 
Logicman said:
Nope.

In the landmark case School District of Abington Township v. Schempp, the U.S. Supreme Court recognized that "the State may not establish a 'religion of secularism' in the sense of affirmatively opposing or showing hostility to religion, thus 'preferring those who believe in no religion over those who do believe." - Sch. Dist. of Abington Twp. v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203, 225 (1963)
Click to expand...

Where did you get this information? Talk about quote mining.

Abington was about getting the bible thrown out of public schools.

Abington School District v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203 (1963), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court decided 8–1 in favor of the respondent, Edward Schempp, and declared school-sponsored Bible reading in public schools in the United States to be unconstitutional.
Click to expand...

Justice Brennan took great pains to also show that many states, such as South Dakota, New Hampshire, Wisconsin, Ohio and Massachusetts, had already enacted and revoked laws similar to Pennsylvania's by the first half of the 20th century. In addition, many political leaders including attorneys general and presidents like Ulysses S. Grant and Theodore Roosevelt insisted that "matters of religion be left to family altars, churches and private schools" and "[It] is not our business to have the Protestant Bible or the Catholic Vulgate or the Talmud read in [public] schools"
Click to expand...
 
Redress said:
Turns out that "bald-faced, serial liar" tells the truth an awful lot...

All True statements involving Barack Obama | PolitiFact
All Mostly True statements involving Barack Obama | PolitiFact

That is better than most politicians.

And do you know who else besides that old book endorse telling the truth? Well, just about every single person. In fact, picking just one person at slightly less than random, Karl Marx espoused the importance of truth. So that old book is kinda like Karl Marx. Think about that awhile. Maybe you will see that big flaw in your logic...
Click to expand...

Not even with an approach radar, flashlight and both hands...
 
Redress said:
Turns out that "bald-faced, serial liar" tells the truth an awful lot...

All True statements involving Barack Obama | PolitiFact
All Mostly True statements involving Barack Obama | PolitiFact

That is better than most politicians.
Click to expand...

Sorry, they missed a bunch. And this is over a year old.

» 252 Documented Examples of Barack Obama

Redress said:
And do you know who else besides that old book endorse telling the truth? Well, just about every single person. In fact, picking just one person at slightly less than random, Karl Marx espoused the importance of truth. So that old book is kinda like Karl Marx. Think about that awhile. Maybe you will see that big flaw in your logic...
Click to expand...

There is no flaw in my logic. And Karl Marx was anything but a 'truth-teller."

The Daily Bell - The Austrian Economists Who Refuted Marx (and Obama)

As for "Redistribution of Wealth," a few excerpts from my previous link:

When given everything by the state, however, through redistribution of wealth, recipients are taught not gratitude but a sense of entitlement... And while government certainly has a safety-net role, the state should eschew policies that enlarge dependency...

A society that is leveled is a society in which all become equally disadvantaged. Yet, many liberals prefer an equality of mediocrity and lack of wealth over one of achievement and prosperity if, in the end, prosperity means some have more than others, even though the poor directly benefit and live better because of the success of others. This is not social justice but socialism, which is a political category, not a moral category.

The greater the ability to create wealth, the more money is available for charity and good works. It is America’s men and women of wealth, imbued with religious and civic responsibility, who have served as the greatest patrons of the civic infrastructure, be it hospitals, libraries, museums, the arts, or the charitable United Way. England once had those patrons, but they went away as redistribution of wealth came in.
 
I couldn't care less about what the Bible says, so I couldn't care less if some bible-banger wrote an article whining about how Obama doesn't govern by it.
 
Logicman said:
Sorry, they missed a bunch. And this is over a year old.

» 252 Documented Examples of Barack Obama
Click to expand...

Infowars....:lamo

There is no flaw in my logic. And Karl Marx was anything but a 'truth-teller."

The Daily Bell - The Austrian Economists Who Refuted Marx (and Obama)

As for "Redistribution of Wealth," a few excerpts from my previous link:

When given everything by the state, however, through redistribution of wealth, recipients are taught not gratitude but a sense of entitlement... And while government certainly has a safety-net role, the state should eschew policies that enlarge dependency...

A society that is leveled is a society in which all become equally disadvantaged. Yet, many liberals prefer an equality of mediocrity and lack of wealth over one of achievement and prosperity if, in the end, prosperity means some have more than others, even though the poor directly benefit and live better because of the success of others. This is not social justice but socialism, which is a political category, not a moral category.

The greater the ability to create wealth, the more money is available for charity and good works. It is America’s men and women of wealth, imbued with religious and civic responsibility, who have served as the greatest patrons of the civic infrastructure, be it hospitals, libraries, museums, the arts, or the charitable United Way. England once had those patrons, but they went away as redistribution of wealth came in.
Click to expand...

There is a huge flaw with your logic, and the bible has been proven wrong on many issues. Turns out it isn't exactly that honest either...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom