Wehrwolfen
Banned
- Joined
- May 11, 2013
- Messages
- 2,329
- Reaction score
- 402
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
By Roger L Simon
8/19/2013
It’s hard to fathom how or why our administration ever thought the Muslim Brotherhood saw democracy as other than a means to an end — and a particularly repellent one at that — in the first place.
It’s not as if the MB is subtle. They have proclaimed who they are since their founding by Hasan al Banna in 1928 and have not wavered in any significant way since in their global jihadist goals. They have also been unstinting in their massive misogyny, homophobia and rigid support of Shariah law über alles (quite literally über alles, since the Brotherhood were — virtually the last still unrepentant — allies of Hitler in WWII).
By Roger L Simon
8/19/2013
It’s hard to fathom how or why our administration ever thought the Muslim Brotherhood saw democracy as other than a means to an end — and a particularly repellent one at that — in the first place.
It’s not as if the MB is subtle. They have proclaimed who they are since their founding by Hasan al Banna in 1928 and have not wavered in any significant way since in their global jihadist goals. They have also been unstinting in their massive misogyny, homophobia and rigid support of Shariah law über alles (quite literally über alles, since the Brotherhood were — virtually the last still unrepentant — allies of Hitler in WWII).
You know, liberal stuff.
Democracy, as their kissing cousin Turkey’s Erdogan so blithely explained, is “like a streetcar. When you come to your stop, you get off.” Or, as one of the Brotherhood’s own internal documents put it in that oh-so-distant year of 2007, they (the MB) are dedicated to “eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house.”
That’s from the Muslim Brotherhood’s “General Strategic Goal” for North America. The “miserable house” of Western civilization of course includes all the tenets of classical liberalism and most of those laterally paid lip service by today’s soi-disant “liberals” (rights of women, rights of homosexuals, freedom of expression, ad tedium, ad hypocrisia).
And yet those same liberals — not to mention the increasingly addle-brained John McCain who seemingly can’t tell an al-Qaeda operative from Paul Revere — are suddenly pounding Saharan sand in outrage at the extreme treatment of the Brotherhood at the hands of the mean Egyptian military.
(Excerpt)
Read more:
Roger L. Simon » Obama’s Strange Love Affair with the Muslim Brotherhood
Will Obama's bias for the Muslim Brotherhood interfere with the quelling of the MB insurgency in Egypt.
[Consistency gentlemen, we need some consistency.
Choose a side.
You seem to be obsessed with Obama; constantly making threads about him.
Do you have a secret man crush on him? I think you may.
The hard lined right HAS been consistant. Whatever Obama is for they are against. Obama could say he hates Al-Qaeda and the hard lined right would find a reason to support Al-Qaeda. If Obama said for everyone to breathe, the hard lined right would try and sufficate themselves out of spite.
I won't go so far as to say racism is the key factor, but there is a seething hatred for Obama from some of the hard lined righties. Obama is a lousy president, but it's hilarious watching the things some of the hard-lined righties pick for a fight. Wehrwolfen's threads are a good example of the seething and foaming hatred for Obama.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?