you
Oh look unverifiable anecdotes :lamo sorry alt-reicher this is out of your league. I know you want genetic hierarchies so badly but like the old stories of bloodline right to rule racial hierarchies were only designed for the people that wanted to benefit from such systems, even if they put another above, there still money to be made by telling the white man he has a genetic destiny in the hierarchies of race. You can tell Murray had a pre-defined objective before he went into this because he did this for his own policy objectives and to make money from discredited eugenics think tanks. Why else would he flippantly leave out relevant data and cite mankind quarterly accolades?****ing anecdotes lol. Those teachers if i took your anecdotes as true did not even say what Murray is saying. Murray’s work is not that the gap exists, its that he pretends to have the sociological background and the relevant scientific background to understand the environmental effects and what heritability means. Since you think social sciences are useless, i highly doubt you have the knowledge to even begin understanding the relevant data to look at.
When have those think tanks been discredited? How have they been discredited? The public and graphic failures of Head Start and No Child Left Behind provide irrefutable proof of significant racial differences in average intelligence. So does this:
RACE, INTELLIGENCE, AND THE BRAIN: THE ERRORS AND OMISSIONS OF THE REVISED EDITION OF S. J. GOULD'S THE MISMEASURE OF MAN
By J. Philippe Rushton
Department of Psychology
University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario N6A 5C2
Gould withholds from his readers that The Bell Curve is mainly an empirical work about the causes of social stratification and that it reached its conclusions only after fully analyzing a 12-year longitudinal study of 12,486 youths (3,022 of whom were African American) which showed that most 17-year-olds with high IQs (Blacks as well as Whites) went on to occupational success by their late 20s and early 30s whereas many of those with low IQs (both Black and White) went on to welfare dependency. The average IQ for African Americans was found to be lower than those for Latino, White, Asian, and Jewish Americans (85, 89, 103, 106, and 115, respectively, pp. 273-278). Failure to mention these data fosters the false belief that IQ tests are not predictive and are biased in favor of North Europeans.
Article...
And this:
=========================
2006 College & University
Guidance, Scholarships, Money and Info Gateways
(For Students, Parents, College Advisors, Mentors,
and Cultural Groups)
==========================
SAT and ACT Scores by Race/Ethnicity: 2003
In recent years the noted pattern of test scores has reflected similar numbers--
Editor, 2005
SAT Ethnic Group Scores (Math/Verbal+total)
• American Indian---482/480 (962)
• Asian American-----575/508 (1083)
• African American-----426/431 (857)
• Puerto Rican----457/448 (905)
Other Hispanic----464/457 (921)
• White-----534/529 (1063)
• Other ----513/501 (1014)
Source:
www.collegeboard.com
Average ACT Composite Score by Race/Ethnicity, 2003
----------------------------------------------------
• African American ----16.9
• American Indian---18.7
• Caucasian---- 21.7
• Mexican American----18.3
• Asian American---- 21.8
• Hispanic----19.0
• Other ----19.3
• Multiracial-----20.9
• Prefer Not to Respond -----21.8
• No Response-----20.1
Source:
Home | ACT
SAT and ACT Scores by Race/Ethnicity
Members of some races tend to perform better on all the mental aptitude tests, however they are designed, than members of other races. Those who perform well on the mental aptitude tests nearly always perform well in the class room and on the job.