We still have shows in California, but the only guns you can buy and take home are 50 years old or more. Destroying the gun show " loophole" ruins gatherings like this of law abiding good people. Screw the antis for their hatred of these people and their fun.
Oklahoma Full Auto Shoot and Trade Show - YouTube
We still have shows in California, but the only guns you can buy and take home are 50 years old or more. Destroying the gun show " loophole" ruins gatherings like this of law abiding good people. Screw the antis for their hatred of these people and their fun.
Oklahoma Full Auto Shoot and Trade Show - YouTube
We still have shows in California, but the only guns you can buy and take home are 50 years old or more. Destroying the gun show " loophole" ruins gatherings like this of law abiding good people. Screw the antis for their hatred of these people and their fun.
Oklahoma Full Auto Shoot and Trade Show - YouTube
We still have shows in California, but the only guns you can buy and take home are 50 years old or more. Destroying the gun show " loophole" ruins gatherings like this of law abiding good people. Screw the antis for their hatred of these people and their fun.
Oklahoma Full Auto Shoot and Trade Show - YouTube
Looks badass, but I just have to say "a sniper competition with targets out to 400 meters" is pretty close to be calling yourself a sniper.
On the Marine Corps known range rifle qualification range, the basic Marine is suppose to be able to hit a man size target from 500 meters and that's with open sights.
The last time I requalified on the range back in the "old Corps", I qualified with the M-14. Fired 10 rounds on the 500 meter line. 9 rounds in the 5 and 1 in the 4.
There's an old 1,000 yard rifle range on Camp Pendleton. It's just off the side of the Las Pulgas Rd. Hasn't been used in decades. Marines use to use that range back when they had the M-1 Garand.
Nice video but I didn't see any guns. I'll watch again.
when I was in middle school the local rifle club ran a "military match" DCM supplied Garands and Lake City M2 Ball was provided for a nominal fee. Now while my dad had been a naval officer he had been a varsity rifle shooter in college and high school and loved shooting these military matches and while I had not shot much center fire (other than his Browning 30-06 hunting rifle) he figured since I shot 500 pellets a week with an olympic level air rifle and was pretty proficient with a 12 G pump gun He'd let me shoot the course
so after ten sighters we started. sure the rifle had more recoil than that Weihrauch 55 but it wasn't all that much heavier and I was used to shooting a sling in prone position. and I had no problem shooting expert level
I don't think I saw one gun that would be legal here.
Our constitutional rights
Your basic human right to arms. It's the same as your right to breath.Infringement on what?
Your basic human right to arms. It's the same as your right to breath.
That's an opinion, and one most people don't agree with.
true
Man is born free and everywhere he is in chains
JJR
Truth is not an opinion, the right to arms is the right to self-defense. 1,000 years ago we would be talking about the sword and bow, 1,000 years from now we'll be talking about energy weapons, different objects, same right. The right to life means you have the right to access food and water, even if you have to steel to survive, that's ethical and moral. The right to pursue happiness is the right to possess a contract or licence, land, income, and set your own rules as long as you aren't harming others. Likewise the right to self defense is the right to access any modern weapon so long as you aren't a danger to anyone.That's an opinion.
Truth is not an opinion, the right to arms is the right to self-defense. 1,000 years ago we would be talking about the sword and bow, 1,000 years from now we'll be talking about energy weapons, different objects, same right. The right to life means you have the right to access food and water, even if you have to steel to survive, that's ethical and moral. The right to pursue happiness is the right to possess a contract or licence, land, income, and set your own rules as long as you aren't harming others. Likewise the right to self defense is the right to access any modern weapon so long as you aren't a danger to anyone.
It's impossible to disagree with this statement because it's not an opinion, it's the truth. If you "disagree" you're simply wrong. Feel free to go in the corner and be wrong all you want, just don't harm others with your stupidity or we're going to have a problem.
So you've never read the Heller decision....Who says its the truth?
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZS.html
1. The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Pp. 2–53.
....
(b) The prefatory clause comports with the Court’s interpretation of the operative clause. The “militia” comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. The Antifederalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable this citizens’ militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms, so that the ideal of a citizens’ militia would be preserved. Pp. 22–28.
http://constitution.findlaw.com/amendment2/amendment.html
The Court reasoned that this right is fundamental to the nation's scheme of ordered liberty, given that self-defense was a basic right recognized by many legal systems from ancient times to the present, and Heller held that individual self-defense was "the central component" of the Second Amendment right. Moreover, a survey of the contemporaneous history also demonstrated clearly that the Fourteenth Amendment's Framers and ratifiers counted the right to keep and bear arms among those fundamental rights necessary to the Nation's system of ordered liberty.
So you've never read the Heller decision....
There's more....
We still have shows in California, but the only guns you can buy and take home are 50 years old or more. Destroying the gun show " loophole" ruins gatherings like this of law abiding good people. Screw the antis for their hatred of these people and their fun.
Oklahoma Full Auto Shoot and Trade Show - YouTube
Yes there is. The firearm is the modern object needed to exercise the basic human right to self defense.What I was getting at was that there is no "natural right" to own a firearm...
That's the declaration of independence, whereas the right to self-defense is inherent in the species for millions of years. The gun is merely the modern object to carry that right out. The right itself has been with human beings since there have been human beings.or at least I don't like to talk natural rights because they have no tangible backing and isn't derive their authority from some intangible impossible to define source that can't be challenged because its "nature" or "God" saying that it should be so.
We're not talking about a legal right. The right to own a firearm is a Basic Human Right exactly like the right to breath. Every single human being on the planet has this right regardless of whether or not their government is infringing upon it.Legal rights
You're just being wrong again. To the corner.however are wholly created by man
Because I had it handy and am about to log out for the night and so don't have the time to look up deep historical references. Yes, I have the Heller decision in my Bookmarks on my browser. I have a lot of Bookmarks.So what you're quoting is a legal source...
There you go being wrong again. My source was a sample proving the claim that I made. That, also, is just a fact.although it doesn't have anything to do with your last post...
Dude I gave you one example. Did you honestly expect me to provide a deep thesis on the matter.... especially on the internet, especially in a single post? Good luck with that arrogance.In other words, if the SCOTUS says something is a right thats good backing to me, if someone else "God says its a right" that's the worst kind of backing.
You are quoting the post which gives that answer. Maybe you should read more, troll less.Let me ask you this, do you believe you have any rights given to you from God or nature and thus are outside the realm of men to seize or take away?
You asked a question, I answered it. You had no point other than to ask a question. You asked the question because you didn't know. THat's why people ask questions.Ugh you obviously missed my point.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?