- Joined
- Jun 6, 2014
- Messages
- 43,804
- Reaction score
- 8,673
- Location
- Flanders.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
LOL!!!
Bone valley, so named due to all the bones which have presumably been found by fossil hunters....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bone_Valley_Formation
Says nothing about shark's teeth. But given it is Florida and very low lying I would expect that the occaisional sea level change would put such things in there.
You will have to do a lot better than quote some place that has scientists all over it.
Where do you get such gibberish from???
Not claimed by anybody.
Where did you get that nonsense from?
The University of Florida offered an imaginative explanation for why so many fossils in Bone Valley were out of geological order. The university scientists claim hurricanes disturbed old fossil beds over millions of years, mixing old fossils with new, leaving the whole jumbled mess out of order today.
I'm not buying speculations like those which may calm the secularists down but do nothing to add to scientific truth.
Someone asked me to do the math, using their numbers, so I did.
Originally Posted by zyzygy View Post
Distance from Earth to Moon 384,400 km
Speed of the Moon's recession from Earth 4 cm per year.
You do the math.
961 million years ago, if secularist assumptions are to be believed, the earth and the moon were in physical contact with each other.
Someone asked me to do the math, using their numbers, so I did.
Given that you are uttely unwilling to look at the utterly overwhelming evidence that shows utterly clearly that the universe is billions of years old you fully know that you have just committed yourself to lying to yourself.
I would find that deeply personally mind unhinging.
You don't need to do this.
96.1 billion years. By too simple maths. Wrong number.
He has convinced himself as long as someone will argue something, it's not a fact.
The University of Florida offered an imaginative explanation for why so many fossils in Bone Valley were out of geological order. The university scientists claim hurricanes disturbed old fossil beds over millions of years, mixing old fossils with new, leaving the whole jumbled mess out of order today.
I'm not buying speculations like those which may calm the secularists down but do nothing to add to scientific truth.
I think it is far deeper than that.
I think the whole thing is a committment to none-truth. To avoidance of mental challenge and permissiveness of double standards.
Ooops, 9.6 billion.
How old are the Earth and Moon? Break the habit of a lifetime and actually answer a question.
Huh? Earth is only 4.6 Billion years old. Moon was formed shortly thereafter, probably due to an impact.
Yes, but if you divide the numbers, orbital distance and rate of increase you get that number.
The point is that it is far more complex than that.
How dare you fabricate nonsense like that? God waved his magic wand! Marke will prove that. We await on him with bated breath.
Rate of increase is certainly not constant. And, the moon was never orbiting the earth at 1 foot. Best guess I read was that the original orbit of our moon was about 25% closer than it is today, which actually does match the math of a steady drift of roughly 4mm per year.
Originally Posted by zyzygy View Post
Distance from Earth to Moon 384,400 km
Speed of the Moon's recession from Earth 4 cm per year.
You do the math.
The energy that Earth loses is picked up by the moon, increasing its distance from the Earth, which means the moon gets farther away by 1.5 inches (3.8 centimeters) annually.8 Sep 2017
I've looked at the same evidence that you have looked at. I'm not ignoring anything. You haven't addressed my counterargument that evidence is not proof. It doesn't matter how much support this evidence may or may not have; it is still not proof of anything... it is merely evidence. Evidence can lead to numerous different conclusions because they are based on observations, and observations are subject to phenomenological issues. We all (as individuals) experience the world in our own unique way.Given that you are uttely unwilling to look at the utterly overwhelming evidence that shows utterly clearly that the universe is billions of years old
...deleted 'you're lying' mantra... deleted 'lack of intelligence' mantra...
Everyone knows it's 6000 years. The good book says so.
If you see a photo of a child, the photo is of you, would you claim that it is false with the same justification as above?
Everyone knows it's 6000 years. The good book says so.
That's 38mm. SI is easy but you do have to make sure you have the right units.
I have explained why the rate is not steady over long time periods.
I've looked at the same evidence that you have looked at. I'm not ignoring anything. You haven't addressed my counterargument that evidence is not proof. It doesn't matter how much support this evidence may or may not have; it is still not proof of anything... it is merely evidence. Evidence can lead to numerous different conclusions because they are based on observations, and observations are subject to phenomenological issues. We all (as individuals) experience the world in our own unique way.
Now, you happen to find this particular evidence to be very convincing, and you have strong faith in your "old Earth-er" religion. Personally, this particular evidence doesn't convince me of anything. I happen to be an agnostic when it comes to the age of the uni(multi)verse while you happen to be a fundamentalist "old Earth-er". That's where we are butting heads.