davidtaylorjr
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 30, 2013
- Messages
- 6,775
- Reaction score
- 1,123
- Location
- South Carolina
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Just 6 down is the Same Story by another POS Tabloid. (DailyMail)
http://www.debatepolitics.com/environment-and-climate-issues/172154-and-now-its-global-cooling.html
("cooling" with "Ice up 60%")
and by Code1211 http://www.debatepolitics.com/envir...ll-time-record-high-ice-extent-antarctic.html
But hey, the whole section is a giant duplicate Blog of another Blog, wattsupwiththat, which also encompasses the Majority of several other people's OPs/posts here.
And Many before that by Lowdown under various "Climate headline you won't see Part ###" bylines that are hard to see because the actual topic isn't discernible from those titles.
It's arrant nonsense, there's nothing of substance to disprove. One incidence doesn't reverse a trend, and this particular incidence is coming off a record low. It's still below the 20 year average of satellite observations.
Like everything you post - combative and empty.And in all of the threads, you came there long enough to complain and add nothing of substance.. Prove his posts wrong then dude... Really...
Like everything you post - combative and empty.
In my previous post in this section a few days ago I noted it had become Blog.
This is Indisputable. Just look 'Lower down' the page.
Previous to that, ALL my posts in the section had lots of meat.. as they do Everywhere else on this board. Perhaps the Most substantial/least frivolous of anyone's board-wide.
However, because of what has Obviously happened to this section I (and I think 2 others) have withdrawn from it - except to point out that Continuing Debacle.
(Manc has answered the OP's Duplicate non-point already)
1. http://www.debatepolitics.com/envir...-more-comedy-gold-un-ipcc.html#post1062221801Trend is that temps are actually going down over the last 15 years.
1. http://www.debatepolitics.com/envir...-more-comedy-gold-un-ipcc.html#post1062221801
2. Manc Already answered your non-point, AS I SAID In my last.
Mebbe Read Before you post your Straight-down-the-line Knee-Jerk Right Wing Creationist Goofy politics.
What JOKE.
3. I suggest again, therefore you not only read Before posting a New string Next Time... but read my Extensive posts on this particular subject.
I'm not going to repost the last few pages here because of your Incompetence.
Tho I have relinked for you one point.
You pop down here with as MindLESS duplicate string as if you've got a scoop. Then, like several other science-Ignorant Teas Partiers, it's back up to your Creationism and... "Obama sucks" etc.
Only on a message board could this encounter/mismatch take place.
I'm Not indulging/encouraging this Unabashed/Unregulated Lowdown BLOG and neither are several others. Bye.
1. http://www.debatepolitics.com/envir...-more-comedy-gold-un-ipcc.html#post1062221801
2. Manc Already answered your non-point, AS I SAID In my last.
Mebbe Read Before you post your Straight-down-the-line Knee-Jerk Right Wing Creationist Goofy politics.
What JOKE.
3. I suggest again, therefore you not only read Before posting a New string Next Time... but read my Extensive posts on this particular subject.
I'm not going to repost the last few pages here because of your Incompetence.
Tho I have relinked for you one point.
You pop down here with as MindLESS duplicate string as if you've got a scoop. (then, like several other NON-science-Ignorant Teas Partiers, back up to your 100% Creationist politics/"Obama sucks" etc.)
Only on a message board could this encounter/mismatch take place.
I'm Not indulging this Lowdown BLOG and neither are several others.
Instrumental temperature record - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
10 warmest years on record (°C anomaly from 1901–2000 mean)
Year - Global - Land - Ocean
2010 0.6590 1.0748 0.5027
2005 0.6523 1.0505 0.5007
1998 0.6325 0.9351 0.5160
2003 0.6219 0.8859 0.5207
2002 0.6130 0.9351 0.4902
2006 0.5978 0.9091 0.4792
2009 0.5957 0.8621 0.4953
2007 0.5914 1.0886 0.3900
2004 0.5779 0.8132 0.4885
2012 0.5728 0.8968 0.4509
Arctic sea ice up 60 percent in 2013 | Fox News
Guess we won't burn up from all of our carbon emissions after all..... :shrug:
Just 6 down is the Same Story by another POS Tabloid. (DailyMail)
http://www.debatepolitics.com/environment-and-climate-issues/172154-and-now-its-global-cooling.html
("cooling" with "Ice up 60%")
and by Code1211 http://www.debatepolitics.com/envir...ll-time-record-high-ice-extent-antarctic.html
But hey, the whole section is a giant duplicate Blog of another Blog, wattsupwiththat, which also encompasses the Majority of several other people's OPs/posts here.
And Many before that by Lowdown under various "Climate headline you won't see Part ###" bylines that are hard to see because the actual topic isn't discernible from those titles.
It's arrant nonsense, there's nothing of substance to disprove. One incidence doesn't reverse a trend, and this particular incidence is coming off a record low. It's still below the 20 year average of satellite observations.
I have always believed, all other things being equal, that higher CO2 levels mean higher temperatures sooner or later. I don't know and do not believe anyone else can make more than I wild guess on what CO2 level increase correlates to what increase in temperatures. I firmly believe that sacrifices by the West are useless and even possibly harmful without sacrifices from the developing world.
1. http://www.debatepolitics.com/envir...-more-comedy-gold-un-ipcc.html#post1062221801
2. Manc Already answered your non-point, AS I SAID In my last.
Mebbe Read Before you post your Straight-down-the-line Knee-Jerk Right Wing Creationist Goofy politics.
What JOKE.
3. I suggest again, therefore you not only read Before posting a New string Next Time... but read my Extensive posts on this particular subject.
I'm not going to repost the last few pages here because of your Incompetence.
Tho I have relinked for you one point.
You pop down here with a MindLESS DUPLICATE string as if you've got a scoop. Then, like several other science-Ignorant Teas Partiers, it's back up to your Creationism and... "Obama sucks" etc.
Only on a message board with thoughtless posters could this encounter/mismatch take place.
I'm Not indulging/encouraging this Unabashed/Unregulated Lowdown BLOG and neither are several others.
(I believe 2 more have withdrawn from this BLOG at my urging as well)
Again and Finally, Goodbye to EC section until someone starts exercising control of this Disgraceful BLOG.
No more content until some semblance of order is established here.
However, the Green house effect of CO2 has run its course. We must Double the concentration of CO2 increase the temperature by that method even one degree.
Like everything you post - combative and empty.
In my previous post in this section a few days ago I noted it had become Blog.
This is Indisputable. Just look 'Lower down' the page.
Previous to that, ALL my posts in the section had lots of meat.. as they do Everywhere else on this board. Perhaps the Most substantial/least frivolous of anyone's board-wide.
However, because of what has Obviously happened to this section I (and I think 2 others) have withdrawn from it - except to point out that Continuing Debacle.
(Manc has answered the OP's Duplicate non-point already)
The link I posted was to the National Snow and Ice Data Center which operates under the auspices of NASA, not WUWT.
Do you have an authority that you would prefer above that one?
So you think the NSIDC is a credible organization?
Because there is no doubt in their mind that AGW exists.
Snow, Ice and Climate Change :: NSIDC
But that's because they are scientists.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?