No, A "Crime" Need Not Be Comitted

[3leftsdoo]

Democrats find the idea that they can impeach Trump even though no crime has been committed is perfect for them, after failing for 3 years to come up with a real crime to charge Trump with.

Arsonists gotta arson.

 

[3leftsdoo]

They’re all corrupt to some extent, absolutely. My point was relative to Trump, they all look pretty good.

Mass murdering war criminals like Truman, LBJ, Nixon and Bush II are MUCH cooler than Trump.

:donkeyfla:

 

[3leftsdoo]

Why thank you!

For what, checking a check box because she misunderstood a family fable about her heritage? Impeaching Warren over that is as likely to happen as tRump AND Pence getting impeached AND convicted, and then Nancy Pelosi becoming President.

New rules:

Impeach, impeach, impeach!

First resort.

:donkeyfla:

 

[3leftsdoo]

Possibly so.

It seems to me a Chairman of a House Committee is under a legal expectation that the information they are making a part of the public record must be accurate, and not purposefully deceitful and full of fabricated lies and distortions.

Further, I think in Schiff's case, a competency hearing is called for, given the mental illness he displayed during his shameful performance during the HIC hearings yesterday.

The Schiffer a head case?

Holy 5150 Batman! :shock:

 

[Airyaman]

Speaking of Schiff...

House Intel hires former Russian mob prosecutor to lead Trump probes - POLITICO

**** is getting serious.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

I wouldn't know.

But >funny< how liberals love to attack and smear great candidates like Gabbard.

And their supporters.

It seems very...

...illiberal.

:shrug:

Who is attacking Gabbard? Name names and provide links.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

Mass murdering war criminals like Truman, LBJ, Nixon and Bush II are MUCH cooler than Trump.

:donkeyfla:

I’d ask you to support your above assertion, but I’m not interested in far right wing fairytales.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

I tell you something even funnier. What if, just what if, tRump is impeached and, because he (tRump) has implicated Pence in the "phone call(s)", Pence is too. Think about that and then laugh your ass of when you realize that IF that happens … wait for it …

IF that happens then … 9 - 8 - 7 … 3 - 2 - 1 … Nancy Pelosi would become President!!!!!! Now that's something to laugh about. :2rofll:

You gotta be careful with jokes like that. You could end up being responsible for causing heart attacks in the Trumpster camp. :lamo

 

[RaleBulgarian]

Oversight doesn't extend to every phone conversation the President has.

Oversight responsibility covers any alleged wrongdoing by the president.

 

[Parrish]

Speaking of Schiff...

House Intel hires former Russian mob prosecutor to lead Trump probes - POLITICO

**** is getting serious.

Good choice.

 

[Bullseye]

Oversight responsibility covers any alleged wrongdoing by the president.

"Any witch hunt that comes to mind" is more like it. He's cough-up the WB complaint and the details of the phone con. The President of Ukraine backed him up. Against that, Congress has a hearsay complaint.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

"Any witch hunt that comes to mind" is more like it. He's cough-up the WB complaint and the details of the phone con. The President of Ukraine backed him up. Against that, Congress has a hearsay complaint.

Are you unaware of what transpired during Trump’s phone conversation with Zelensky? What Trump did with funds already approved by Congress to aid Ukraine’s defense? How Trump administration officials gave Zelensky a heads up on what Trump would want from him?

 

[Bullseye]

Are you unaware of what transpired during Trump’s phone conversation with Zelensky? What Trump did with funds already approved by Congress to aid Ukraine’s defense? How Trump administration officials gave Zelensky a heads up on what Trump would want from him?

I'm aware of what transpired during the conversation- the other crap you spew isn't pertinent.

 

[SkyFox76]

I'm aware of what transpired during the conversation- the other crap you spew isn't pertinent.

Says you.

What's happened here is Trump seems to have thought that when the Mueller thing came to an end with no formal charges, he'd skated into the end zone. Nothing can touch Trump!

Now, I don't know how this will move forward, it could get worse or it could fall apart, but I am laughing at the fact Mr Trump went from the frying pan into the fire and once again is running around with his hair on fire screaming PRESIDENTIAL HARASSMENT and WITCH HUNT!! :lol:

 

[RaleBulgarian]

I'm aware of what transpired during the conversation- the other crap you spew isn't pertinent.

per·ti·nent
/ˈpərtnənt/
adjective
relevant or applicable to a particular matter

Nope, they haven’t changed the definition of pertinent since last time I read it in a dictionary.

Sorry, pertinent fits perfectly.

 

[Bullseye]

Says you.

What's happened here is Trump seems to have thought that when the Mueller thing came to an end with no formal charges, he'd skated into the end zone. Nothing can touch Trump!

Says you.

Now, I don't know how this will move forward, it could get worse or it could fall apart, but I am laughing at the fact Mr Trump went from the frying pan into the fire and once again is running around with his hair on fire screaming PRESIDENTIAL HARASSMENT and WITCH HUNT!! :lol:

That isn't Trump; it's the Trumpophobes doing their usual happy dance before the wheels come off the bus as usual.

 

[SkyFox76]

Says you.
That isn't Trump; it's the Trumpophobes doing their usual happy dance before the wheels come off the bus as usual.

He literally just melted down on Twitter posting videos for an hour .

That's where the wheels are coming off the bus and you don't have enough hands to keep trying to put the lug nuts back on. But keep on trying

 

[Bullseye]

He literally just melted down on Twitter posting videos for an hour .

That's where the wheels are coming off the bus and you don't have enough hands to keep trying to put the lug nuts back on. But keep on trying

You spend an hour watching him tweet?

 

[marke]

Arsonists gotta arson.

And crooked politicians must destroy evidence if caught.

 

[ocean515]

Speaking of Schiff...

House Intel hires former Russian mob prosecutor to lead Trump probes - POLITICO

**** is getting serious.

So Schiff is hiring Russians to help influence a Presidential Election?

It would be a compliment to say Schiff has **** for brains

 

[SkyFox76]

You spend an hour watching him tweet?

:lamo No, I have a life and no Twitter account. I guess being president does have it's perks though. It's not like he's got anything better to do right?

 

[Bullseye]

:lamo No, I have a life and no Twitter account. I guess being president does have it's perks though. It's not like he's got anything better to do right?

So, all that blather about Trump coming undone and creating a Tweet storm was second hand? Are you the IC whistleblower? :lol:

 

[SkyFox76]

So, all that blather about Trump coming undone and creating a Tweet storm was second hand? Are you the IC whistleblower? :lol:

Sorry I didn't realize you're not able to open a link and see what's listed. Maybe the stable genius can help you out.

 

[Athanasius68]

Alot of mouthbreathing going on over this, so I wanted to make a thread here dedicated to the constitutional interpretation of the impeachment process.

High Crimes and Misdemeanors - Constitutional Rights Foundation



As 2nd amendment advocates will clearly agree with this interpretation, I suspect Turtledude to change his opinion directly. The constitution's original intent is quite clear as the founders understood it. It's quite clear the founders had used the terminology best known to them to describe abuses of power and other damaging acts for the trust of the public.

I would suggest everyone read this article and specifically the highlighted portion. The founders intent is paramount; if impeached, the SCOTUS would never dare overturn it; as an originalist court would and indeed must interpret the constitution as the founders intended.

Discuss.

The courts can't stop an impeachment or overturn an impeachment.
And yes, no crime need have been committed. Congress sets its own standards for impeachment.
However, as we all know, there is no crime at at the core of all this. All it is a disagreement of the constitutional authority of the president using total minutia.
Well, there is no reason why a president can't challenge in court the actions of Congress; there is no reason to suppose that they can't be guilty of abusing their own power. After all, the Democrats will benefit from their actions of impeaching a Republican president. No reason why that shouldn't be blasted out there.

 

[Obscurity]

The courts can't stop an impeachment or overturn an impeachment.
And yes, no crime need have been committed. Congress sets its own standards for impeachment.
However, as we all know, there is no crime at at the core of all this. All it is a disagreement of the constitutional authority of the president using total minutia.
Well, there is no reason why a president can't challenge in court the actions of Congress; there is no reason to suppose that they can't be guilty of abusing their own power. After all, the Democrats will benefit from their actions of impeaching a Republican president. No reason why that shouldn't be blasted out there.

It doesn't matter if there is a crime. You admit that then use that as a defense. Lol.