• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

NIST's Fraudulent Report on the Collapse of WTC7 on 9/11 [W:2152,2510]

Bob0627 said:
That you can't tell which is which is understandable given your irrational unquestioned defense of the entire 9/11 narrative.
Click to expand...

That you think they're all of worth is understandable given that you're a conspiracy theorist who comes to conclusions first.
 
Mark F said:
That video which YOU have repeatedly linked to is nothing but 5 minutes of Truthers making s__t up. But for some reason you seem to be proud of it.
Click to expand...

The budget was limited. But I guess that's better than an entire government and several of its agencies spending millions and a number of years making s__t up. The video maker just plagiarized the story. Couldn't you tell? You post it almost daily.
 
Fledermaus said:
Bob, I ask again.

Are the 19 hijackers a lie?
Are the 4 airliners hijacked a lie?

Etc.
Click to expand...

Why are you asking me? You don't believe it? I thought you did.
 
Bob0627 said:
The budget was limited. But I guess that's better than an entire government and several of its agencies spending millions and a number of years making s__t up. The video maker just plagiarized the story. Couldn't you tell? You post it almost daily.
Click to expand...

Yes, thousands of people all lying to Bob and Henry. Life is so difficult for them.
 
Fledermaus said:
And yet they continue to try to trot out the necrotic equine.
Click to expand...

As they do with all their garbage. The same canards dragged out and debunked over and over again. I saw one that was thoroughly proven to be false by Sunzi surface yet again yesterday. It's like Groundhog Day with these issues.
 
NWO_Spook said:
As they do with all their garbage. The same canards dragged out and debunked over and over again. I saw one that was thoroughly proven to be false by Sunzi surface yet again yesterday. It's like Groundhog Day with these issues.
Click to expand...

They aren't even creative in their presentation.
 
Bob0627 said:
The budget was limited. But I guess that's better than an entire government and several of its agencies spending millions and a number of years making s__t up. The video maker just plagiarized the story. Couldn't you tell? You post it almost daily.
Click to expand...

The budget was limited so they just made up a bunch of stuff - for a Youtube video? And hundreds of Truthers like you watch this junk and get suckered by it and think its freakin' brilliant.

Speaks volumes about Truthers.
 
Mark F said:
The budget was limited so they just made up a bunch of stuff - for a Youtube video? And hundreds of Truthers like you watch this junk and get suckered by it and think its freakin' brilliant.

Speaks volumes about Truthers.
Click to expand...

Youtube and doctored gifs is about the strength of their resources. Throw in some prejudice and hate and *BOOM*~instant nutcase.
 
Mark F said:
The budget was limited so they just made up a bunch of stuff - for a Youtube video? And hundreds of Truthers like you watch this junk and get suckered by it and think its freakin' brilliant.

Speaks volumes about Truthers.
Click to expand...

And tens of millions just like you were suckered by the official story because I'm sure you know for sure government and its agencies never lie.
 
NWO_Spook said:
And another stupid accusation surfaces from the depths yet again.
Click to expand...

You mean this one?:

And hundreds of Truthers like you watch this junk and get suckered by it and think its freakin' brilliant.
Click to expand...

Yeah I tend to agree.
 
Bob0627 said:
And tens of millions just like you were suckered by the official story because I'm sure you know for sure government and its agencies never lie.
Click to expand...

So speaking of government lies ...

Point WTC7-6: The Fraudulent NIST Claim That There Was No Steel Recovered from Building WTC7 for Analysis

The Official Account

No steel from WTC 7 was recovered from the collapse site, as NIST reports have repeatedly pointed out.[1]

Just as there was no reference to recovered WTC 7 steel in NIST’s Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (2008),[2] there was also no reference to the building or recovered steel in The 9/11 Commission Report (2004).[3]

Because no steel from WTC 7 was recovered, it was impossible to carry out any metallography.[4]

Accordingly, it was impossible for NIST to make any statements about the quality of WTC 7’s steel in its investigations.[5]

NIST has been able to describe the steel only on the basis of construction-related documents.[6]

The Best Evidence

I. There is ample physical evidence refuting NIST’s claim that no steel was recovered from WTC 7:
Click to expand...

I forgot to post some of the evidence. So who is this?:

Figure-C2-300x225.webp
 
Bob0627 said:
... So who is this?:
Click to expand...
Dunno but the argument sounds like David Cole AKA Kawika who is obsessed with proving NIST wrong.
And his argument style is strong on innuendo, vagueness and evasion. Sound Familiar?

He uses the same tactics as Tony Szamboti:
- micro focus on a detail which may or may not be true BUT refuses to show why the detail is either relevant or significant.
- then gets underwear in knots and turns to personal abuse whenever I politely explain that until he proves his assumptions his claim is "UNPROVEN"

And that when I am being very generous and ONLY showing "UNPROVEN" when most debunkers would be shouting "FALSE" "WRONG" "LIES"
 
Last edited:
ozeco41 said:
Dunno but the argument sounds like David Cole AKA Kawika who is obsesses with proving NIST wrong.

And his argument style is strong on innuendo, vagueness and evasion. Sound Familiar?
Click to expand...

You don't recognize John Gross? Do you know who he is?
 
Bob0627 said:
And tens of millions just like you were suckered by the official story because I'm sure you know for sure government and its agencies never lie.
Click to expand...

At least we've got a story. You guys can't even get that organized.

Cheers :2wave:
 
Bob0627 said:
And tens of millions just like you were suckered by the official story because I'm sure you know for sure government and its agencies never lie.
Click to expand...

And tens of millions just like you were suckered by the UNOFFICIAL story because I'm sure you know for sure THE INTERNET never lies.

BTW- It is not just "government and its agencies".. A point you IGNORE repeatedly.

It was:

The FBI
The military
Law enforcement at all levels
ABC, CNN, CNBC, MSN, REUTERS, AL JAZEERA, CBC, The New York Times, the Chicago Tribune, etc, etc.
It is NIST
It is the ASCE
It is the University of Sydney
It is the University of Beijing
It is Purdue University
It is the various Fire experts.
It is all the labs used by the above entities.
It is the coroner of Suffolk County.
It is the military coroners.
It is thousands that combed the debris for months
It is the tens of thousands who witnessed the events.

And thousands more... They all lied, or Bob is wrong. Decisions, decisions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom