....and four of them are MMTers. Five, if you include Wynne Godley. And they should have counted Bill Mitchell, too.
Nine People Who Saw the Greek Crisis Coming Years Before Everyone Else Did - Bloomberg Business
Maybe there is something to this "monetary sovereignty" thing...
The basis of their complaints is that the EU lacks any mechanism (as currently constructed) that can effect fiscal policy, which prevents Keynesian-style countercyclical deficit spending.
Anybody care to make the case for more austerity?
One thing I should say immediately is that Greece would profit very much by taking a number of the steps the lenders are requiring. The country would do much better.
This is not the same as saying austerity is a good idea in these circumstances. Generally a government should be restricted to only sensible spending on what economists call "public goods"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_good . When the private sector reduces its activities it can make sense to expand fiscal spending to prevent recessions becoming depressions or to try to stimulate out of a depression to prevent civil unrest. This is certain,y the case in Greece today, where we could easily get a breakdown of society and general uproar.
The problem in Spain, Ireland, Portugal, France and Greece is that the spending on social programs et alias in good times have depleted borrowing availability. So the question is, where should the cash come from. In the case of Euroland the EZB has factually refinanced the ailing countries(, which is illegal BTW but has been allowed by the courts on a theory that buying someones debt is not refinancing her). But to expand government spending enough to save the hungry, sick or unemployed youth (up to 60%) more cash would be required. This can only come from the other members of Euroland. The arguments are rather good to justify it. Among others:
1. The problem is primarily not the Greeks or Spaniards etc. IT is the construction of the Euro the defects of which made later crisis and damage to people all over Euroland unavoidable and which were known at the time of signing the Maastricht Treaty.
2. Demanding the Greeks fulfill the contracts is pure hypocrisy and non general application of law. The Greeks did sign but so did the others. When the Germans broke the Maastricht contract in its first year of existence they were allowed to and the others were left to deal with the problems. The Germans have not complied with the Stability Pact in any year.
3. The Other countries signed the Greek entry off, though, they did know at the time, that the balance sheets were way off.
We are talking of a collective failure and general collusion. This does lend credibility to the argument for the others pitching in.