guns_God_glory
Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2005
- Messages
- 149
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- BEAUTIFUL Ohio, BEAUTIFUL USA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
*the Onion is a satirical paper.WASHINGTON, DC—Almost a year after the cessation of major combat and a month after the nation's first free democratic elections, President Bush unveiled the coalition forces' strategy for exiting Iraq.
"I'm pleased to announce that the Department of Defense and I have formulated a plan for a speedy withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq," Bush announced Monday morning. "We'll just go through Iran."
Repub05 said:I'm not sure but I don't think we'll be getting into a war anytime soon after we're done in Iraq. But the most likely candidate that we would war against would probably be N. Korea because they pose the largest threat, but like I said I'm not really sure.
guns_God_glory said:Who will be the next up after we are completely finished in Iraq? Many options. I only put the obvious candidates up there. What do you think?
guns_God_glory said:Who will be the next up after we are completely finished in Iraq? Many options. I only put the obvious candidates up there. What do you think?
War isn't something you want. Without war there is no peace. With peace there is war.Gandhi>Bush said:Is it a requirement that we always be at war?
What is the requirement that we are not always in war? *Inverse Logic Statement*Gandhi>Bush said:Is it a requirement that we always be at war?
"Other than stopping Nazism, Fascism, Communism, and slavery, and other than securing independence for the U.S. and other countries, war has never solved anything!"Shye said:how about we DONT go to war with anyone. War is for losers
Aparently you've never had a conflict with anyone. Now imagine the conflict in the scale size of countries. It is called a war.Shye said:how about we DONT go to war with anyone. War is for losers
Like you and Ralph Nader! :2wave:Shye said:how about we DONT go to war with anyone. War is for losers
stsburns said:What is the requirement that we are not always in war? *Inverse Logic Statement*
Requirements:
Pessimism
Isolationism
Hippies
Anarchy
Gandhi>Bush Becomes President! :mrgreen:
etc...
Ahh yes.guns_God_glory said:War isn't something you want. Without war there is no peace. With peace there is war.
GySgt said:It most certainly does matter. WE do enough. WE constantly bring the Palestenians and the Israelis to the peace tables.
WE brought peace between Israel and Egypt.
WE fight for peace in Bosnia.
WE led the charge in Kuwait.
WE led the charge to feed the hungry in Somalia.
WE have come to Europe's aid twice to fight against the Germans and one of those times was while we were fighting our own part of it in the Pacific.
WE make annual hurricane humanitarian reliefs in the Carribean and South America. WE mobilize and send support to volcano eruptians in the Phillipines.
WE currently are running operations in the HOA (Horn of Africa). WE are not the problem. The problem is everybody else's impotence to do anything without our backing or charge. If Europe is so much better, than let's see them do something for the world except point fingers and criticize about how WE don't do enough.
You should learn more about America. Maybe you wouldn't be so quick to join the ranks of the cowards that really do nothing.
Arthur Fonzarelli said:"Other than stopping Nazism, Fascism, Communism, and slavery, and other than securing independence for the U.S. and other countries, war has never solved anything!"
oh war is necessary for some things like in Hitler's case, but not the war we are at right nowArthur Fonzarelli said:"People [. . .] love to say that 'Violence never solved anything.' But what solved Hitler? Was it a team of social workers? Was it putting daisies into the gun barrels of Nazi Panzer divisions? Was it a commission that tried to understand what made Hitler so angry? No. What solved Hitler was violence. And what will solve the problem of Islamo-fascist terrorism, I'm sorry to say, is not understanding, negotiation, conferences, social workers, daisies, or anything other than the heroic violence of brave men and women with guns, fighting selflessly for their country -- this greatest nation on God's green earth."
--Michael Medved, radio host and author.
Arthur Fonzarelli said:"War is an ugly thing but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feelings which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."
-- John Stuart Mill.
Arthur Fonzarelli said:"War is an ugly thing but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feelings which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."
-- John Stuart Mill.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?