• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

New York Post gives Dems hope - Faithless electors could still elect Hillary Dec 20th

Re: New York Post gives Dems hope - Faithless electors could still elect Hillary Dec

There is a zero point zero chance of this happening.
 
Re: New York Post gives Dems hope - Faithless electors could still elect Hillary Dec

Good luck with that. Classy the way they keep spreading naked photos at the Post of our First Lady-Elect.
 
Re: New York Post gives Dems hope - Faithless electors could still elect Hillary Dec

More left wing bias still making tje election about her even after she has lost

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
Re: New York Post gives Dems hope - Faithless electors could still elect Hillary Dec

backpacker said:
Good luck with that. Classy the way they keep spreading naked photos at the Post of our First Lady-Elect.
Click to expand...

Whatever. Looking at naked pics of the first lady is about the only gratification most of Trump's supporters are ever going to get from voting for him. It's going to be a small consolation for his failure to bring manufacturing back to the Rust Belt, but... whatever.
 
Re: New York Post gives Dems hope - Faithless electors could still elect Hillary Dec

NoLeftNoRight said:
The one scenario that could still get Hillary into the White House | New York Post

This would probably result result in outright civil war. I don't believe the American people who voted for Trump would go for this.

Comments?
Click to expand...
Not going to happen. And I don't think even Clinton, as much as she desperately wanted the job, would even accept it.

Donald Trump will be our next President. Whether one loves that idea or hates it or is anywhere in between, it's just the fact.
 
Re: New York Post gives Dems hope - Faithless electors could still elect Hillary Dec

It looks like Trump will carry Michigan, that will give him 306 Electors to Hillary's 232.
39 electors would have to change their vote.
I would say there are low odds of that happening.
 
Re: New York Post gives Dems hope - Faithless electors could still elect Hillary Dec

NoLeftNoRight said:
The one scenario that could still get Hillary into the White House | New York Post

This would probably result result in outright civil war. I don't believe the American people who voted for Trump would go for this.

Comments?
Click to expand...

Trump won. You lot can drop the revolution fetish now....




Of course, feel free to pick it up again in a couple years when it becomes clear that as predicted, Trump is just an exaggerated version of business as usual. We already tried hope and change, sung by an outsider. I guess people were too obsessed with being mad at muslims to realize that they were voting for the same song, different singer.
 
Re: New York Post gives Dems hope - Faithless electors could still elect Hillary Dec

Mr Person said:
Trump won. You lot can drop the revolution fetish now....
Click to expand...

They won't have anything else to say for a while, until someone feeds them new talking points. Should take a week or so for the software to update so to speak.
 
Re: New York Post gives Dems hope - Faithless electors could still elect Hillary Dec

If someone want so see riots that there would sure do it.
 
Re: New York Post gives Dems hope - Faithless electors could still elect Hillary Dec

RickJames3000 said:
Whatever. Looking at naked pics of the first lady is about the only gratification most of Trump's supporters are ever going to get from voting for him. It's going to be a small consolation for his failure to bring manufacturing back to the Rust Belt, but... whatever.
Click to expand...
Dont feel bad when your voice is ignored

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
Re: New York Post gives Dems hope - Faithless electors could still elect Hillary Dec

trouble13 said:
Dont feel bad when your voice is ignored

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

You've already demonstrated that you lack the self-discipline to ignore me.:2razz:
 
Re: New York Post gives Dems hope - Faithless electors could still elect Hillary Dec

Goshin said:
Yes, it would result in civil war.


There is no question about that.
Click to expand...

Maybe not right away or directly, but it sure would let us know where we stand..
 
Re: New York Post gives Dems hope - Faithless electors could still elect Hillary Dec

Hawkeye10 said:
If someone want so see riots that there would sure do it.
Click to expand...

I don't think Trump voters would riot like the libs.. We are more calculating and would come up with more efficient approaches I would think...
 
Re: New York Post gives Dems hope - Faithless electors could still elect Hillary Dec

Orly? said:
I don't think Trump voters would riot like the libs.. We are more calculating and would come up with more efficient approaches I would think...
Click to expand...
Yeah, you just run with all haste to your local gun shop and buy up all the guns and ammo they have in stock for the inevitable revolution/civil war/gun confiscation. :roll:

People act stupidly when they lose. It's not a right or left thing, it's just a thing. It just so happens those who supported the Democrat are acting stupid now and those who supported the Republican acted stupid last time.
 
Re: New York Post gives Dems hope - Faithless electors could still elect Hillary Dec

It will never happen. It should not happen. I would never vote for someone like Ttump, but we work within our political framework.
 
Re: New York Post gives Dems hope - Faithless electors could still elect Hillary Dec

All I can hear is the liberal faux outrage that Trump reserved the right to contest the election results if there was cause to do so. The hypocrisy of the left was deafening this election cycle, its evidence of terribly misguided rhetoric. They may have a good message buried somewhere, but its lost in the nonsense and hate speech they engaged in all season.
 
Re: New York Post gives Dems hope - Faithless electors could still elect Hillary Dec

Hmm... I wonder if Trump-supporters would flip-flop on their current love for the electoral college...
 
Re: New York Post gives Dems hope - Faithless electors could still elect Hillary Dec

Slyfox696 said:
Yeah, you just run with all haste to your local gun shop and buy up all the guns and ammo they have in stock for the inevitable revolution/civil war/gun confiscation. :roll:

People act stupidly when they lose. It's not a right or left thing, it's just a thing. It just so happens those who supported the Democrat are acting stupid now and those who supported the Republican acted stupid last time.
Click to expand...

Can you post a link to those tens of thousands of Republican cry babies that took to the streets after Obama's first OR second victory?...because I think there's a bit of a mistake in your argument there.

It's a little insulting that you compare the adult like response of most who call themselves Republicans to the utterly childish response of tens of thousands if not millions of Hillary Liberals.
 
Re: New York Post gives Dems hope - Faithless electors could still elect Hillary Dec

NoLeftNoRight said:
Can you post a link to those tens of thousands of Republican cry babies that took to the streets after Obama's first OR second victory?...because I think there's a bit of a mistake in your argument there.
Click to expand...
I didn't say they did, I said they made all haste to their local gun shops to prepare for revolution/civil war/gun confiscation, which was their way of acting stupidly.

Seriously, do you even read anything you respond to? That's twice just today where you have shown absolutely zero comprehension of what you've read when responding to my post. Stop vomiting rhetoric and actually comprehend what someone says before you respond.
 
Re: New York Post gives Dems hope - Faithless electors could still elect Hillary Dec

NoLeftNoRight said:
The one scenario that could still get Hillary into the White House | New York Post

This would probably result result in outright civil war. I don't believe the American people who voted for Trump would go for this.

Comments?
Click to expand...
The only way I could support this is if something totally disqualifying came out between now and December 19 - like incontrovertible evidence that Trump murdered somebody or was paid by Putin to run for president or something. Or maybe in a hypothetical case where someone won the popular vote by like 5% or more but somehow lost the electoral vote.

It's never going to happen here - it's a fantasy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom