I'd like to propose a new type of debate, and wondering what people here think. I think at least 1 debate should be have a rule where each candidate can't talk about their opponent, where they can only talk about what they would do as president, and their own ideals.
What say you?
I'd like to propose a new type of debate, and wondering what people here think. I think at least 1 debate should be have a rule where each candidate can't talk about their opponent, where they can only talk about what they would do as president, and their own ideals.
What say you?
I'd like to propose a new type of debate, and wondering what people here think. I think at least 1 debate should be have a rule where each candidate can't talk about their opponent, where they can only talk about what they would do as president, and their own ideals.
What say you?
Like - Like - Like - Like - Like - Like - Like - Like - Like - Like - Like - Like - Like - Like - Like - Like - Like - Like !!
In theory great.
In practice, not so much. Its actually somewhat easy to talk about your opponent without directly talking about your opponent, and essentially this is what would happen which would cause the other to complain about it whenever the first person did it and it'd generally spiral out from there I think.
It would require a good moderator and strict rules, such as if the mod thinks you are breaking the rule you get a warning, if you do it again you lose your time on that topic.
It would require a good moderator and strict rules, such as if the mod thinks you are breaking the rule you get a warning, if you do it again you lose your time on that topic.
I'd like to propose a new type of debate, and wondering what people here think. I think at least 1 debate should be have a rule where each candidate can't talk about their opponent, where they can only talk about what they would do as president, and their own ideals.
What say you?
In theory great.
In practice, not so much. Its actually somewhat easy to talk about your opponent without directly talking about your opponent, and essentially this is what would happen which would cause the other to complain about it whenever the first person did it and it'd generally spiral out from there I think.
I'd like to propose a new type of debate, and wondering what people here think. I think at least 1 debate should be have a rule where each candidate can't talk about their opponent, where they can only talk about what they would do as president, and their own ideals.
What say you?
I'd like to propose a new type of debate, and wondering what people here think. I think at least 1 debate should be have a rule where each candidate can't talk about their opponent, where they can only talk about what they would do as president, and their own ideals.
What say you?
It would require a good moderator and strict rules, such as if the mod thinks you are breaking the rule you get a warning, if you do it again you lose your time on that topic.
I would like to end all the debates and go back to Congress voting only.I'd like to propose a new type of debate, and wondering what people here think. I think at least 1 debate should be have a rule where each candidate can't talk about their opponent, where they can only talk about what they would do as president, and their own ideals.
What say you?
Fixed it for you.Let's up the ante and hook them to electro-shock machines and they get zapped whentheir time is up and they are still talkingthey talk.
Fixed it for you.
Not bad, but I'd expand my desires to inlcude all candidates that qualify to be on the ballot in enough states to mathmatically (electorally) become president. The way it used to be when The League of Women Voters used to host the debates.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?