• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

new Text Msgs Reveal FBI Agent was Friends with Judge in Flynn Case

haymarket said:
and that was false.
Click to expand...

Don't you just hate it when a poster edits your posts, presents them as complete and pretends that they are not edited. Very slippery. I know I hate it when you do it continuously in almost every post you quote.

A laundry list of you own impressions unsupported by any quotes from the principals discussed or citation of any real world events is rubbish.

This is what you post.

Have you got any real world facts? If you do, it would be nice to see them. If you have them, why are you hiding them so effectively?

Why are gripped by the fantasies that possess you?
 
code1211 said:
Don't you just hate it when a poster edits your posts, presents them as complete and pretends that they are not edited. Very slippery. I know I hate it when you do it continuously in almost every post you quote.

A laundry list of you own impressions unsupported by any quotes from the principals discussed or citation of any real world events is rubbish.

This is what you post.

Have you got any real world facts? If you do, it would be nice to see them. If you have them, why are you hiding them so effectively?

Why are gripped by the fantasies that possess you?
Click to expand...

In post 105 I gave you an entire list of facts. In 107 I gave you the law that was requested - also a fact.

Resorting to low brow cheap shots insults against me does not change that reality.
 
haymarket said:
In post 105 I gave you an entire list of facts. In 107 I gave you the law that was requested - also a fact.

Resorting to low brow cheap shots insults against me does not change that reality.
Click to expand...

Your list was a laundry list of stuff and nonsense that you recount which is unrelated to actual real world facts germane to the topic.

The quotation of the law was an interesting digression from the topic.

Would you care to post the statute on double parking used in Paris?
 
code1211 said:
Your list was a laundry list of stuff and nonsense that you recount which is unrelated to actual real world facts germane to the topic.

The quotation of the law was an interesting digression from the topic.

Would you care to post the statute on double parking used in Paris?
Click to expand...

The quotation of the law was requested and provided.

My list was pure factual. Do you wish to dispute any of the facts I listed? To make it easy for you, here they are again

*** Donald Trump publicly invited the Russians to help him in his campaign and promised them if they did so they would be rewarded for their help

*** The Russians interfered in the election process and aided Trump in his effort to get elected.

*** Help from foreign nations in providing things of value to a presidential campaign is illegal according to federal law

*** Top Trump campaign officials met with people they believed represented Russian government interests for the purpose of obtaining illegal information in the campaign which would violate the federal law.

*** Top Trump campaign officials even speculated on the best way to use the illegal information and discussed coordinating things like timing of the release of the info.

*** Persons associated with Trump and his campaign colluded with those connected to the hack and the wikileaks release.

*** As the information was released, Trump and his campaign embraced it and weaponized it and used it over 160 times in the campaign.

*** As the scandal around this has developed publicly, Trump has openly and repeatedly lied and lied and lied some more about his relationship with Russians and the involvement of his top people with the Russians.

*** Several people associated with Trump including some senior officials have pled guilty to the crimes related to the scandal and its cover-up.

Which of these facts are you disputing?
 
haymarket said:
The quotation of the law was requested and provided.

My list was pure factual. Do you wish to dispute any of the facts I listed? To make it easy for you, here they are again

*** Donald Trump publicly invited the Russians to help him in his campaign and promised them if they did so they would be rewarded for their help

*** The Russians interfered in the election process and aided Trump in his effort to get elected.

*** Help from foreign nations in providing things of value to a presidential campaign is illegal according to federal law

*** Top Trump campaign officials met with people they believed represented Russian government interests for the purpose of obtaining illegal information in the campaign which would violate the federal law.

*** Top Trump campaign officials even speculated on the best way to use the illegal information and discussed coordinating things like timing of the release of the info.

*** Persons associated with Trump and his campaign colluded with those connected to the hack and the wikileaks release.

*** As the information was released, Trump and his campaign embraced it and weaponized it and used it over 160 times in the campaign.

*** As the scandal around this has developed publicly, Trump has openly and repeatedly lied and lied and lied some more about his relationship with Russians and the involvement of his top people with the Russians.

*** Several people associated with Trump including some senior officials have pled guilty to the crimes related to the scandal and its cover-up.

Which of these facts are you disputing?
Click to expand...

I'm disputing your methodology.

Everything you listed is an unsourced, unreferenced, untrue opinion from your biased and twisted view of the world.

When you have on rare occasion in the past linked to the basis of your fantasies, you are always exposed as the propagandist you are.

THAT is why I always ask for the link on which you and others rely. Most of those links presented are also unsourced, unreferenced and untrue opinions.

That kind of link is what passes for reporting in today's world, so your ignorance of the proper foundation of reporting is excusable.

However, your gullibility is not a justification for anything else than your idle chatter. When I cite your opinions as opinions, it's confusing why you find that to be insulting.

What could possibly make you think that your opinion based on rumor is fact? Especially when there is so much room for error? I find this to be more revealing of you than of anything you state.
 
code1211 said:
I'm disputing your methodology.

Everything you listed is an unsourced, unreferenced, untrue opinion from your biased and twisted view of the world.
Click to expand...

So which of the facts that I have listed to you dispute? It appears you do not dispute a single one.

THAT is why I always ask for the link on which you and others rely. Most of those links presented are also unsourced, unreferenced and untrue opinions.
Click to expand...

If I said there were seven continents - would you ask for a link?

If I said FDR brought in The New Deal - would you ask for a link?

If I said the Beatles appeared on Ed Sullivan and drew a major audience - would you ask for a link?

What on my list are you disputing that requires a link to something you had never previously been informed about or dispute?
 
Last edited:
haymarket said:
So which of the facts that I have listed to you dispute? It appears you do not dispute a single one.



If I said there were seven continents - would you ask for a link?

If I said FDR brought in The New Deal - would you ask for a link?

If I said the Beatles appeared on Ed Sullivan and drew a major audience - would you ask for a link?

What on my list are you disputing that requires a link to something you had never previously been informed about or dispute?
Click to expand...

Any one of them. I loved it when you imagined that a joke told by Trump in front of millions in person and on TV was an appeal to enter into a secret conspiracy.

Tell me another one.
 
code1211 said:
Any one of them. I loved it when you imagined that a joke told by Trump in front of millions in person and on TV was an appeal to enter into a secret conspiracy.

Tell me another one.
Click to expand...

Sure thing. But lets have your boy Trump tell you the jokes that make up his routine. You know the routine don't you? Its the one where Trump gets a bad case of public diarrhea of the mouth and you guys who clean up for him want to pretend its fine Swiss chocolate dribbling down his chin instead of the other stinky stuff. The routine that has more so called "jokes" than a baggy pants Vegas comedian in an out of date tux playing the afternoon show in a seedy side street strip club.

One of the late was Trump was "just joking" when he invented the Japanese bowling ball test off the hoods of imported cars.

So Trump was "just joking" about killing people in broad daylight and it not hurting his popularity?

And Trump was "just joking " when he invited the Russians into the election to help him and then they did just that?

And Trump was "just joking" about grabbing women by the vagina and how he could not help himself from doing it?

And Trump was "just joking" about peeping in on minors half undressed at beauty pageants because he had the power to do it since it was his pageant?

And Trump was "just joking" about punching protesters at his rallies and having them carried out on stretchers like the old days?

And Trump was "just joking" about congressmen being guilty of treason for not clapping loud enough reminiscent of the Soviet Union or Nazi Germany?

And Trump was “just joking” when he said that police should rough up arrested suspects instead of respecting their constitutional rights?

And Trump was “just joking: when he said he challenged Sec of State Rex Tillerson to an IQ test to show he was smarter?

And Trump was “just joking” he accused Obama of being a founder of ISIS?

And Trump was “just joking” when he suggested a SecondAmendment solution to dealing with Hillary Clinton?

The guy seems to be one living breathing joke - and a bad one at that. Sadly, that is a joke on the American people.
 
haymarket said:
yeah - because judges cannot have any friends in other white collar law related fields. :doh:roll:
Click to expand...

The judge RECUSED himself, and you say there is nothing? Would you like some fries with that blind faith?
 
haymarket said:
Sure thing. But lets have your boy Trump tell you the jokes that make up his routine. You know the routine don't you? Its the one where Trump gets a bad case of public diarrhea of the mouth and you guys who clean up for him want to pretend its fine Swiss chocolate dribbling down his chin instead of the other stinky stuff. The routine that has more so called "jokes" than a baggy pants Vegas comedian in an out of date tux playing the afternoon show in a seedy side street strip club.

One of the late was Trump was "just joking" when he invented the Japanese bowling ball test off the hoods of imported cars.

So Trump was "just joking" about killing people in broad daylight and it not hurting his popularity?

And Trump was "just joking " when he invited the Russians into the election to help him and then they did just that?

And Trump was "just joking" about grabbing women by the vagina and how he could not help himself from doing it?

And Trump was "just joking" about peeping in on minors half undressed at beauty pageants because he had the power to do it since it was his pageant?

And Trump was "just joking" about punching protesters at his rallies and having them carried out on stretchers like the old days?

And Trump was "just joking" about congressmen being guilty of treason for not clapping loud enough reminiscent of the Soviet Union or Nazi Germany?

And Trump was “just joking” when he said that police should rough up arrested suspects instead of respecting their constitutional rights?

And Trump was “just joking: when he said he challenged Sec of State Rex Tillerson to an IQ test to show he was smarter?

And Trump was “just joking” he accused Obama of being a founder of ISIS?

And Trump was “just joking” when he suggested a SecondAmendment solution to dealing with Hillary Clinton?

The guy seems to be one living breathing joke - and a bad one at that. Sadly, that is a joke on the American people.
Click to expand...

Do you know how to post a link?
 
DarkWizard12 said:
The judge RECUSED himself, and you say there is nothing? Would you like some fries with that blind faith?
Click to expand...

I have no idea what you are talking about. Can you be a little less vague?
 
haymarket said:
Sure thing. But lets have your boy Trump tell you the jokes that make up his routine. You know the routine don't you? Its the one where Trump gets a bad case of public diarrhea of the mouth and you guys who clean up for him want to pretend its fine Swiss chocolate dribbling down his chin instead of the other stinky stuff. The routine that has more so called "jokes" than a baggy pants Vegas comedian in an out of date tux playing the afternoon show in a seedy side street strip club.

One of the late was Trump was "just joking" when he invented the Japanese bowling ball test off the hoods of imported cars.

So Trump was "just joking" about killing people in broad daylight and it not hurting his popularity?

And Trump was "just joking " when he invited the Russians into the election to help him and then they did just that?

And Trump was "just joking" about grabbing women by the vagina and how he could not help himself from doing it?

And Trump was "just joking" about peeping in on minors half undressed at beauty pageants because he had the power to do it since it was his pageant?

And Trump was "just joking" about punching protesters at his rallies and having them carried out on stretchers like the old days?

And Trump was "just joking" about congressmen being guilty of treason for not clapping loud enough reminiscent of the Soviet Union or Nazi Germany?

And Trump was “just joking” when he said that police should rough up arrested suspects instead of respecting their constitutional rights?

And Trump was “just joking: when he said he challenged Sec of State Rex Tillerson to an IQ test to show he was smarter?

And Trump was “just joking” he accused Obama of being a founder of ISIS?

And Trump was “just joking” when he suggested a SecondAmendment solution to dealing with Hillary Clinton?

The guy seems to be one living breathing joke - and a bad one at that. Sadly, that is a joke on the American people.
Click to expand...

Do you know how to post a link?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom