- Joined
- May 19, 2006
- Messages
- 156,720
- Reaction score
- 53,497
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
OK CC but I will never understand why Liberals are ashamed at being addressed as such.........I don't call all that just the ones that claim to be moderate or independent and in every thread they spout left wing rhetoric.......For instant I try not ot call DD that because he is one and is proud of it.........
Actually no, because he had an original mother and father. It was still in the natural order of things. He knew his biological father. It would only work if one of his 2 daddies died, then he wouldn't be looked at so troubling. The school authorities would merely assume that his mother had passed away.
It's more about folks like Blackdog. He's NOT a liberal... I've seen him post a lot and is not left-wing. I don't care if you call me "your left-wing friend"... I lean left and I am your friend. But Blackdog doesn't want you to, so for him, don't.
It's more about folks like Blackdog. He's NOT a liberal... I've seen him post a lot and is not left-wing. I don't care if you call me "your left-wing friend"... I lean left and I am your friend. But Blackdog doesn't want you to, so for him, don't.
I hate to say this but this is a personal conversation btwn u 2. Id like to suggest you guys take it to PMs
I hate to say this but this is a personal conversation btwn u 2. Id like to suggest you guys take it to PMs
Not so. Any answer that we give to one another, benefits the whole.
In bold. Appeal to tradition or Appeal to nature logical fallacy. Doesn't fly... sorry. But here, try this one:
Here's the dilemma, bicycleman. Suppose little Johnny gets into trouble at school and gets expelled. The Principal sends a note home to his parents. Johnny is instructed that if he wants to get back to school, he must have both his mother and father come to school to explain why he should be readmitted to the school. That puts poor little Johnny in a quandary because his mother was artificially inseminated and he never knew his father. Whatever will he do, now?
Oh, and you never addressed this part:
Do you realize how absolutely ridiculous your example sounds? This is NOT how it occurs. A parent or guardian would be required to do this, not both. Your example is foolish and not part of reality.
OK CC but I will never understand why Liberals are ashamed at being addressed as such.........I don't call all that just the ones that claim to be moderate or independent and in every thread they spout left wing rhetoric.......For instant I try not ot call DD that because he is one and is proud of it.........
All of which is nothing but your opinion, as I said. Appeal to Tradition. Sorry, but the bible is NOT evidence. Try again.
Still not a problem because it equates to the fact that his dad may have been killed in the war, thus causing him to grow up without a father.
If my point is ridiculous, then why do you bother coming here with a counter argument?
If so, why is the Constitution based on these Biblical truths?
If so, why is the Constitution based on these Biblical truths?
Based on doesn't mean "follows to the letter" which is what you are insinuating. The bible is NOT the Constitution. That is why God's Law is NOT the law of the land.
The problem is you think anyone who disagrees with you is a "left winger." I am a Moderate conservative. I tend to be a little more socially liberal because the Constitution protects the minority against the tyranny of the majority.
Just from this thread here is the criteria you set for being conservative...
We must treat all Arabs as terrorists, Muslim or not.
Freedom of Religion is only for Christians, because we are a Christan nation.
Gays are perverts because anal sex is disgusting.
More government is OK for security against the brown skinned folk.
This is like some caricature of white people from the 30's and 40's. Just replace Arab with Japanese.
Seriously.
No it doesn't. It could be some random sperm from a sperm bank. Similar to if a female gay couple had a child, one which one of the women had been artificially inseminated. Absolutely no difference.
To point out the ridiculousness of the argument. I consider it a public service for those who want accurate information.
But you also did not address the issue that a school would NEVER do this. They would request a guardian. They would have on file who the guardian is. You are creating a non-real situation to fit an illogical agenda. THAT is my point.
It goes much farther than that. Gods law is for our personal lives, not a government like Muslim law can be.
I wonder if you have ever read the Declaration of Independence........
Okay, let me go back to that point. Schools in my day would send letters home to the parent or "guardian". You are correct. I will concede to that, but notice it says parent or guardian, not guardians. I grew up after WW2, and as a result, there were many children without fathers. There was still no letter for "guardians." It said parent or guardian. Either the mother or a family member if both parents were deceased.
Gods law are weaved into the fabric of this country and to say otherwise is ludicrous........
OK... so you're agreeing with me. I'm not sure if there is another point you are trying to make here.
Gods law are weaved into the fabric of this country and to say otherwise is ludicrous........
To bad the Constitution, is what gives us our laws and not the DOI. :roll:
I suppose next you want to try and say the articles of confederation are somehow relevant???:lol:
Gods law are weaved into the fabric of this country and to say otherwise is ludicrous........
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?