• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Netanyahu was wrong about Iraq having nuclear weapons

pbrauer said:
Click to expand...


But that was less the issue. The issue was that the SC had demanded Iraq show where the known wmd were and the dictator refused.
 
joG said:
But that was less the issue. The issue was that the SC had demanded Iraq show where the known wmd were and the dictator refused.
Click to expand...

Well there wasn't any. The point is that Netanyahu was wrong then and he wrong now. There is nothing wrong with negotiating with Iran. "Trust but verify" ~ President Reagan
 
The OP youtube is a BS Left Wing ConspiracYst and you MISrepresent what's in it.
But UNLIKE Your empty Source bashing...
I Will deal with whats in that quote-mined youBube from '91177'.
LOFL!

NOWHERE did Netanyahu say Iraq had Nukes.
Of course, that's in large part probably due to Israel taking out their Nuke plant in 1981, 20 years before the appearance portrayed. (2002?)

He Accurately said Saddam had a lifle-long "Pursuit" of WMDs, and he Did: including Chemical Weapons used on the Kurds, and bizarro tech like John Bull's Long Gun which could shoot projectile Hundreds of miles, perhaps further, even sub-orbital.. bypassing the need for missiles. And he flirted with Nukes as well.

Your wack job '91177 youtube' also tries/opens with the antisemitic canard, that it was Netanyahu who convinced the USA to attack Iraq... instead of our own Intelligence.

And again, what Grotesque Hypocrisy on YOUR part, Emptily objecting to my WSJ OP 'opinion piece'
in this Same section...
http://www.debatepolitics.com/gener...ry-folding-like-tent-iran.html#post1064373221
pbrauer said:
WSJ OPINION - Not interested
Click to expand...
then posting/OPing with this Piece of RAGING CRAP BoobToob.
WTF!
Please Get your partner-in-crime over here to see this!
`
 
Last edited:
The OP title is a lie. He did not claim Iraq has nuclear weapons.
 
pbrauer said:
Well there wasn't any. The point is that Netanyahu was wrong then and he wrong now. There is nothing wrong with negotiating with Iran. "Trust but verify" ~ President Reagan
Click to expand...

You can trust them, if you want. If they do not allow you to verify, however, you may assume they are lying. And in existential matters the government would be negligent at the highest level to treat such behavior otherwise.
 
US Conservative said:
Lolz I think you are attempting to smear Netanyahu for making Obama look like a weenie. Bibi sounds more like a POTUS than Obama does.
Click to expand...

Wasn't Putin also more Presidential than Obama. It is laughable that Righties can not even find a acceptable alternative to Obama in their own ranks...but have to in-source candidates...truly sad.

How Righties ache for a "real man" to be their President.
 
1750Texan said:
Wasn't Putin also more Presidential than Obama. It is laughable that Righties can not even find a acceptable alternative to Obama in their own ranks...but have to in-source candidates...truly sad.

How Righties ache for a "real man" to be their President.
Click to expand...

Im not a Putin fan, but at least he can lead. Our POTUS can't. Its just a failure of liberalism I think-the inability to deal with reality.

Im expecting Obama to push a jobs bill for Iran any day now. :doh
 
1750Texan said:
Wasn't Putin also more Presidential than Obama. It is laughable that Righties can not even find a acceptable alternative to Obama in their own ranks...but have to in-source candidates...truly sad.

How Righties ache for a "real man" to be their President.
Click to expand...
There is only one president at a time. And ours is pushover on the world stage. So the obvious comparison is to other world leaders not potential ones. But I agree it will be nice to have a 'real man' as president again.
 
1750Texan said:
Wasn't Putin also more Presidential than Obama. It is laughable that Righties can not even find a acceptable alternative to Obama in their own ranks...but have to in-source candidates...truly sad.

How Righties ache for a "real man" to be their President.
Click to expand...

Unlike you who approves of the wrong man for the job.
 
Fletch said:
There is only one president at a time. And ours is pushover on the world stage. So the obvious comparison is to other world leaders not potential ones. But I agree it will be nice to have a 'real man' as president again.
Click to expand...

Indeed, just ask Osama bin Laden and Muammar Gaddafi.
 
1750Texan said:
Wasn't Putin also more Presidential than Obama. It is laughable that Righties can not even find a acceptable alternative to Obama in their own ranks...but have to in-source candidates...truly sad.

How Righties ache for a "real man" to be their President.
Click to expand...

I would suggest that more than just "righties" want a "real man" to be everyone's president.

After seven years of lies, foreign policy stumbles, expansion of wars, economic chaos, and a growing list of international irritants I suggest everyone but the die hard Obamalanders want a "real man" as president; a 'real man' who will live up to his word, not deliberately use "tortured language" to sell a bad law, not lie hundreds of times about who could "keep your plan", even more about the costs...

In fact, forget the "real" part all together and we can say the American people now long for a "man" as president, someone with a set of balls.
 
US Conservative said:
Pete, when did Netanyahu say Iraq had nukes?
Click to expand...
He didn't he said, "There is no question whatsoever Saddam is working.." The title is in error, I didn't it until after I posted it. My bad.

My question to you: How did Netanyahu know Saddam was working for a nuke when we know now he wasn't?
 
Fearandloathing said:
I would suggest that more than just "righties" want a "real man" to be everyone's president.

After seven years of lies, foreign policy stumbles, expansion of wars, economic chaos, and a growing list of international irritants I suggest everyone but the die hard Obamalanders want a "real man" as president; a 'real man' who will live up to his word, not deliberately use "tortured language" to sell a bad law, not lie hundreds of times about who could "keep your plan", even more about the costs...

In fact, forget the "real" part all together and we can say the American people now long for a "man" as president, someone with a set of balls.
Click to expand...

bathhouse-barry-mooch.jpg
 
pbrauer said:
He didn't he said, "There is no question whatsoever Saddam is working.." The title is in error, I didn't it until after I posted it. My bad.

My question to you: How did Netanyahu know Saddam was working for a nuke when we know now he wasn't?
Click to expand...

Of course he was working for nuke. Liberal/Progressive memes can't erase historical facts, no matter how many times it's tried.

IAEA and Iraq - Global Special Weapons - Nuclear, Biological Chemical and Missile Proliferation News

UNSCOM Reports to the Security Council
 
pbrauer said:
He didn't he said, "There is no question whatsoever Saddam is working.." The title is in error, I didn't it until after I posted it. My bad.

My question to you: How did Netanyahu know Saddam was working for a nuke when we know now he wasn't?
Click to expand...

You are evading the question.

Saddam is dead. He died before Obama was around. It has nothing whatsoever to do with Netanyahu's current assertions.

Your thread is bogus.

Simply admit it that Netanyahu never said Iraq HAS nukes as in "Netanyahu was wrong...."

You blew it...again
 
Fearandloathing said:
You are evading the question.

Saddam is dead. He died before Obama was around. It has nothing whatsoever to do with Netanyahu's current assertions.

Your thread is bogus.

Simply admit it that Netanyahu never said Iraq HAS nukes as in "Netanyahu was wrong...."

You blew it...again
Click to expand...

You quoted me, why don't you read it???
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom