- Joined
- Dec 22, 2009
- Messages
- 4,138
- Reaction score
- 807
- Location
- Volunteer State
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
This is a continuation of debate from the Breaking News section. I move it here per moderator warning as the discussion is moving towards more into the abortion debate. In that thread my post with various debaters starts from here:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...form-abortions-w-425-a-35.html#post1065889443
However, in the context of human affair of this nation, both the 5th and the 14th amendment do talk about "life", which specifically prohibit the depriving of life. The Declaration of Independence firmly declares that the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God who entitles us the self-evident truth of certain unalienable Rights, "that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." Notice that Life is listed first and foremost.
Now, isn't a prenatal life growing in a human mother's womb a Life from human procreation in human event? Of course it is.
So, how can you dismiss the procreated Life of its unalienable Right to Life as clearly and specifically mentioned in the Declaration of Independence? How can you deprave of its Life as specifically prohibited by the 5th and 14th amendments where they state: "nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law" and "nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law", respectively?
No, you people steadfast refuse to see what are clearly mentioned in the founding documents and contained in the Constitution. Instead you people chose to deny the self-evident truth that the Declaration of Independence clearly revealed. In its stead you people twisted the Constitution and invented rights that are not there and call it "women's rights" in order to legitimize the violation of human life. But out of thin air did the Roe v Wade court set the faux rights in a synthetic stone for you and your proabortion cohort to salivate upon and to embrace in order that you people can slaughter innocent human lives with impunity to your heart's content and be falsely comforted by it's "legality".
The Oklahoma antiabortion bill was just a revisiting of the antiabortion laws that exist in various States before Roe v Wade ruled them unconstitutional. But, it is sad that in this day and age, what is right is deemed wrong and what is wrong is deemed right; where good is turned into evil and evil good. Clearly, the antiabortion law that criminalizes the act of murder of human beings in the womb truly conforms to the spirit of the Declaration of Independence and upholds the Constitution of our nation. It also acknowledges the self-evident truth of human life in the womb that is confirmed through the science of human embryology.
What is unconstitutional is the legislating from the bench by a bunch of unelected black robes nincompoops against the will of the People and against the Constitution by depriving the human life of its life without due process of the law. Yet, no truth can get in the way of the proabortion activists and their supporters. For they don't want the truth. They want innocent blood to be taken as sacrifice for their bottomless lust that nothing inconvenient can get in their way of carnal pleasure.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...form-abortions-w-425-a-35.html#post1065889443
Neither the 5th nor the 14th amendment contains anything about "women's rights" let alone the phantom right to abortion or privacy.Unless women rights contained in the 5th and 14th Amendment are dismantled and women are no longer protected under those Bill of Right Amendments Roe v Wade won't be overturned. It would take a Constitutional Amendment to do that. That's NOT going to happen. Consequently, the Federal government can't create or enact anti-abortion laws because they are unconstitutional.
However, in the context of human affair of this nation, both the 5th and the 14th amendment do talk about "life", which specifically prohibit the depriving of life. The Declaration of Independence firmly declares that the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God who entitles us the self-evident truth of certain unalienable Rights, "that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." Notice that Life is listed first and foremost.
Now, isn't a prenatal life growing in a human mother's womb a Life from human procreation in human event? Of course it is.
So, how can you dismiss the procreated Life of its unalienable Right to Life as clearly and specifically mentioned in the Declaration of Independence? How can you deprave of its Life as specifically prohibited by the 5th and 14th amendments where they state: "nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law" and "nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law", respectively?
No, you people steadfast refuse to see what are clearly mentioned in the founding documents and contained in the Constitution. Instead you people chose to deny the self-evident truth that the Declaration of Independence clearly revealed. In its stead you people twisted the Constitution and invented rights that are not there and call it "women's rights" in order to legitimize the violation of human life. But out of thin air did the Roe v Wade court set the faux rights in a synthetic stone for you and your proabortion cohort to salivate upon and to embrace in order that you people can slaughter innocent human lives with impunity to your heart's content and be falsely comforted by it's "legality".
The Oklahoma antiabortion bill was just a revisiting of the antiabortion laws that exist in various States before Roe v Wade ruled them unconstitutional. But, it is sad that in this day and age, what is right is deemed wrong and what is wrong is deemed right; where good is turned into evil and evil good. Clearly, the antiabortion law that criminalizes the act of murder of human beings in the womb truly conforms to the spirit of the Declaration of Independence and upholds the Constitution of our nation. It also acknowledges the self-evident truth of human life in the womb that is confirmed through the science of human embryology.
What is unconstitutional is the legislating from the bench by a bunch of unelected black robes nincompoops against the will of the People and against the Constitution by depriving the human life of its life without due process of the law. Yet, no truth can get in the way of the proabortion activists and their supporters. For they don't want the truth. They want innocent blood to be taken as sacrifice for their bottomless lust that nothing inconvenient can get in their way of carnal pleasure.