Nate in Skeptic Shock by Tom the Dancing Bug

[Phys251]

This sums up climate science denialism very nicely. :lol:

If you are going to respond to this using denialist beliefs, please prove that your opinion carries more weight than the entire scientific community's combined. Your comments will be judged first and foremost based on your ability to formulate and defend this proof.

 

[Taylor]

Your comments will be judged first and foremost based on your ability to formulate and defend this proof.

...says the guy with the comic-book argument, lol.

 

[Phys251]

...says the guy with the comic-book argument, lol.

Please post your proof as requested.

 

[joG]

This sums up climate science denialism very nicely. :lol:

If you are going to respond to this using denialist beliefs, please prove that your opinion carries more weight than the entire scientific community's combined. Your comments will be judged first and foremost based on your ability to formulate and defend this proof.

The math has been known since Dr Malthus and Dr Darwin. It's only been a question of the variables and parameters. It still is.

 

[Jack Hays]

[h=2]Expert judgement and uncertainty quantification for climate change[/h] Posted on April 28, 2016 | 179 comments
by Judith Curry
When it comes to climate change, the procedure by which experts assess the accuracy of models projecting potentially ruinous outcomes for the planet and society is surprisingly informal. – Michael Oppenheimer
Continue reading →

 

[Tim the plumber]

Originally Posted by Tim the plumber View Post
I am asking you what you think because you seem to be under the impression that the earth could boil or something.

The worst case scenario, as predicted by the IPCC, is for a 4.2c rise over pre-industrial temperatures by 2100. We already have had 0.8c and have not seen the 0.3c per decade rise needed to achieve this since the graph that predicted it came out 18 years ago.

So what do you think is so bad about it all?

Sixth time of asking [6].

Any chance of an answer or are you going to deny the question again?

 

[Lord of Planar]

Sorry, but the deniers are the one's who think the OP is accurate.

We do not deny the reality of AGW.

We just disagree with the severity of the claims.

When you continually get the argument wrong, and will not accept the truth.... YOU ARE THE DENIERS!