• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

NAACP Releases Statement On 2014 Elections, But No Mention Of Mia Love Or Tim Scott

Re: NAACP Releases Statement On 2014 Elections, But No Mention Of Mia Love Or Tim Sco

NAACP Releases Statement On 2014 Elections, But No Mention Of Mia Love Or Tim Scott's Historic Wins - Matt Vespa

Instead they focused on the bogus issue of voter ID preventing people of color to vote.

Dip****z.

Is it really surprising. NAACP did a study on the relation of crime and welfare. It found that for a 50% increase in welfare there was a 110% increase in crime. But they still support and back pro-welfare candidates while bitching about the number of black men in prison.

It's a liberal organization, not one based upon bettering black people. This proven by both the op and it's illogical approach to issues like I mentioned. Only Liberals and other leftist could be that illogical.
 
Last edited:
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

This is also true of the Catholic Church, the Mormon Church and Focus on the Family with regard to Republicans and conservatives.

No, that has more to do with separation of church and state.
 
Re: NAACP Releases Statement On 2014 Elections, But No Mention Of Mia Love Or Tim Sco

The intent of the NAACP is to lobby for black causes and Democrats are more receptive than Republicans. You may not like it...but Blacks are allowed to organize in this country

The mission of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People is to ensure the political, educational, social, and economic equality of rights of all persons and to eliminate race-based discrimination.

So with that mission statement I would think they would celebrate the first black person elected to a statewide office in a southern state post reconstruction. Is that not part of eliminating race-based discrimination?
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

That only counts if one is a democrat.

How often have we heard that Obama is merely a product of AA. But we sure don't hear that about republican blacks.

Well, I'm just trying to see whether the statistics and rule of thumb used by Turtle actually apply to black Republicans. I'm sure they will, until they get elected. I think what is interesting is that Nikki Haley (a minority, even though she's shed her ethnic names) appointed another minority (Tim Scott) for office, and that minority seems to favor companies making stronger efforts to hire minorities. But I am sure none of that is Affirmative Action now.
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

It's the "systemic privilege exists" argument.

Privilege would mean that only colored people would need IDs, while whites just stroll up and vote no questions asked.
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.


Only the "other" is a product of AA. The "us" exist in a world without AA.
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

Privilege would mean that only colored people would need IDs, while whites just stroll up and vote no questions asked.

Umm... no.

:lamo
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.


That's probably one of the things you like most about him.
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

Umm... no.

:lamo

You know if there is any person who can't afford an ID, have them step up. I have no doubt they would be taken care of somehow.
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

That's probably one of the things you like most about him.

Oh, I haven't even begun to state my feelings on this matter. I am actually glad Republicans have realized that race does matter in elections. The fact that a Southern state finally made the decision to elect a black male without meddling from Republicans is progress. It doesn't matter that Tim Scott was initially picked for his position by another minority. Ironically, Tim Scott's election by the historically progressive Republican party is doing the same exact thing Republican carpetbagger efforts did in the 1870s.
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

Do you not understand what systemic privilege means, or do you deny the existence of it.



Once again you need to define it.
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

Once again you need to define it.

While I find it amazing that someone would not know, I can understand how being so ignorant could result in a horrible misunderstanding wherein AA is racist because, as far as the person knows, there is no such thing as systemic privilege.

Here's an article to introduce you to the concept. I'm sure you'll like the source.

What Is a ‘system of privilege’?
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.




really a blog?





uhm, obama identified himself as black, hell he ran on it, calling out typical white people as racists. lmao
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

uhm, obama identified himself as black, hell he ran on it, calling out typical white people as racists. lmao

What does that have to do with the paragraph you quoted? Did you miss some of the sentences?
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

You know if there is any person who can't afford an ID, have them step up. I have no doubt they would be taken care of somehow.

Systemic privilege is not overt institutionalized privilege. You're conflating the terms.

Anyway, I support voter ID.
 
Re: NAACP Releases Statement On 2014 Elections, But No Mention Of Mia Love Or Tim Sco


wouldn't surprise me at all. They got theirs and to hell with all the rest of the blacks. They were, after all, elected by conservative whites from the south who don't give a damn about minorities.
 
Re: NAACP Releases Statement On 2014 Elections, But No Mention Of Mia Love Or Tim Sco

wouldn't surprise me at all. They got theirs and to hell with all the rest of the blacks. They were, after all, elected by conservative whites from the south who don't give a damn about minorities.
Utah is the south? I think one of us needs a new map.
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

What does that have to do with the paragraph you quoted? Did you miss some of the sentences?



I read it, the last sentence shows how seriously the blog should be taken.
 
Re: NAACP Releases Statement On 2014 Elections, But No Mention Of Mia Love Or Tim Sco

:lol: yeah. that's why they support school choice, eh? Blacks overwhelmingly want it and so obviously the NAACP is all about it, right?

lol I don't think you could've found a more biased, partisan source than the anti-science Heartland Institute, if you tried. Those are the folks that testified before congress that smoking doesn't cause cancer and now they want you to believe a poll conducted by morons in Oklahoma that want to abolish Common Core in favor of creationism. Yay, let the dumbing down of America begin.

That was the first link....I haven't looked at the second....I don't think my heart can't take it.
 
Re: NAACP Releases Statement On 2014 Elections, But No Mention Of Mia Love Or Tim Sco



Common core i goofy and dumbing down america.


 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

I read it, the last sentence shows how seriously the blog should be taken.

Look, it's just an overview of the concept for one that has no clue. What, you wanna sign up for 3 credit hours?

How do you expect to debate social dynamics without a clue regarding systemic privilege.
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

Look, it's just an overview of the concept for one that has no clue. What, you wanna sign up for 3 credit hours?

How do you expect to debate social dynamics without a clue regarding systemic privilege.


Maybe you can give me some examples of "systemic privilege".
 
Re: NAACP Releases Statement On 2014 Elections, But No Mention Of Mia Love Or Tim Sco

Utah is the south? I think one of us needs a new map.

Utah? they might as well be. After all, they only decided to recognize the equality of blacks once they realized that they needed them for the football team.
 
Re: NAACP Releases Statement On 2014 Elections, But No Mention Of Mia Love Or Tim Sco

Utah is the south? I think one of us needs a new map.

LOL!

Maybe he meant the whites in southern Utah.
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

You have no idea how diversity is valuable to a university and its students, do you.

Indeed I do, yet you seem to limit diversity to matters (factors?) of race/ethnicity (perhaps even economic status) but not based on any other factors. I maintain that diversity of political opinion, economic background, rural/city environment matters as well - how diverse is any group that votes mainly (90%+?) for one political party?

Obviously, a random lottery would be best at assuring diversity, as it can give no weight to any "discriminating" factors. What seems to pass for diversity (to you?) is a desire to define an "optimal mix" and thereby skew the selection (discrimination?) process to achieve that mix.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…