• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Muslims who voted for Trump upset by his pro-Israel cabinet picks

Uh huh.




You were specifically asked how many woman and children should be killed. You said as many as it takes.

Babies and kids had **** all to do with it.

Like I said. I don't support YOUR kids or anyone elses being killed because someone else did something either. At least I'm consistent.
 
Netanyahu is as tuned in to American politics as anyone here. He knew how much of a wedge issue the Gazan War would be for the Democratic Party and how that would impact the 2024 election.

And now with an American government that's 100% pro-Israel and 100% anti-Palestinian, there won't be Palestinians in a few years (or less).
And if it comes to that at least I have not sat back and watched it happen silently.
 
You were specifically asked how many woman and children should be killed. You said as many as it takes.

Babies and kids had **** all to do with it.

Like I said. I don't support YOUR kids or anyone elses being killed because someone else did something either. At least I'm consistent.


But their parents did.


Unfortunate but it's part of war.
 
Exactly what I said. I can't be any clearer.

I'm not trying to be difficult or combative, but "at least I have not sat back and watched it happen silently" can actually have several meanings, in the context of the election and this discussion.
 
I'm not trying to be difficult or combative, but "at least I have not sat back and watched it happen silently" can actually have several meanings, in the context of the election and this discussion.
I’m thinking the avatar isn’t random?
 
I'm not trying to be difficult or combative, but "at least I have not sat back and watched it happen silently" can actually have several meanings, in the context of the election and this discussion.
I'm not trying to be dificult either.

Here was my thoughts on the conflict and the election.

I don't believe that those who will "no longer" vote for him were actually ever going to support Joe anyway.

I do think care needs to be taken not to alienate and attack those who support Joe for the most part but have what they see as a legitimate concern with some of the ways the Biden administration has handled the I/P situation to date.

Democrats should continue to support each other and find common ground in other areas where they can.
 
I don't know what that avatar means.
I had it all queued up in my reply, but said, if he wants to know, he’ll find out.
 
Uh huh.




Hamas was their only representative - there is no alternative to Hamas, so take the word support with a grain of salt. From the POV of most Palestinians, Hamas is better than the country that stole their grandparents' land, yes. Almost any group of people on the face of the earth would feel that way if you stole their land, too.
 
I had it all queued up in my reply, but said, if he wants to know, he’ll find out.
And I did. Finally got a reverse image search add-on for my browser.
 
It never ceases to amaze me how easily people can be convinced to vote against their own interests.
 
They probably bought into the whole taking rights away from women/misogyny nonsense the left was feeding everyone.
The right is taking rights away from women. Your denial doesn't change that.
 
In your view, what is the acceptable number of Palestinian women and children that should be killed in response to every Israeli that were victims of Hamas? Is it 10, 100, 1000?
If you start a war, you should have the balls to see it through to the end, and not just hide behind the skirt of the international community and use your own people as both human shields and political pawns when things don't go according to plan.
 
In your view, what is the acceptable number of Palestinian women and children that should be killed in response to every Israeli that were victims of Hamas? Is it 10, 100, 1000?
Ask Hamas they are the ones killing them.
 
THEY are responsible for it all starting with the attack on the Israelis.
If a criminal took a woman as hostage and then hid behind a dozen children. Would you kill a dozen children to save that woman? Would you tell yourself its all the fault of the criminal that took the woman hostage? Of course you wouldn't.
 
Its a complex issue and obviously there had to be a severe response, but there is also a concept of proportionality that Israel has blown way past.

I wouldn't have as much of a problem if the IDF would go door-to-door and round up or even take out the terrorists. But bombing schools and hospitals is disgusting.
 
Back
Top Bottom