- Joined
- Oct 4, 2017
- Messages
- 23
- Reaction score
- 9
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I just came across this short YouTube clip (link below), discussing Trump statements which seems to link his victory to Musks stay in Pennsylvania and his knowledge about vote counting computers:
View attachment 67552425
Have any of you seen it? Any comments?
What many Republicans don't get is that convicted criminal person will make y'all pay as he breaks his promises to all of us, one after another. What y'all actually voted for when you voted for trump is more debt, higher prices and less service from our government. Let us on the left know when prices start to drop and gas is cut in half, we'll be waiting and hoping Donald at least fulfills those two promises he made to the citizens of America while campaigning.That "convicted felon" label in action as hoped for and expected by the Left.
LOL! Didn't do much to help the Democrats to win now did it?
As for the question posed by the video?
IMO Trump meant nothing more than that Elon trusted the computers after looking at them. Gave Trump more confidence the positive polling numbers might well reflect in the votes. Which they did since he won PA.
By the way, 50.6% is a majority where the opponent got 49.4% (or less if a 3rd Party candidate got any percentage of the votes).![]()
And why wouldn't it be? It certainly applies. Trump IS a convicted felon.That "convicted felon" label in action as hoped for and expected by the Left.
![]()
Have you seen anything which backs up that statement? Did he actually 'look' at them? If yes, what kind of access did he get? What exactly did he look at?IMO Trump meant nothing more than that Elon trusted the computers after looking at them
Trump's count was not 50.6%. He got a plurality of votes, not a majority.By the way, 50.6% is a majority where the opponent got 49.4% (or less if a 3rd Party candidate got any percentage of the votes).
link his victory to Musks stay in Pennsylvania and his knowledge about vote counting computers
'faux addicts'? Please elaborate.If the election was rigged, reputable sources will find out eventually. At this point, I haven't seen evidence of that. I blame Republican voters / faux addicts.
Here's a good podcast that explains faux.'faux addicts'? Please elaborate.
When some ballot boxes were set on fire in October, I was surprised (I'm living in Scandinavia) that one could vote that way in US. How do people identify themselves as legitimate voters when voting in such boxes?
'faux addicts'? Please elaborate.
When some ballot boxes were set on fire in October, I was surprised (I'm living in Scandinavia) that one could vote that way in US. How do people identify themselves as legitimate voters when voting in such boxes?