• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Musk & Twitter

Bringing Balance or Weaponizing information?


  • Total voters
    26

grip

Light △ Bender
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 1, 2011
Messages
33,086
Reaction score
14,055
Location
FL - Daytona
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Is Elon Musk's purchase of Twitter bringing some conservative balance to social media, like Fox on cable, in a sea of liberal media influences, or is it more rightwing nuttery that propagates disinformation?

 
1. I hope that Mr. M. will allow more freedom of expression. That's great!

2. I hope that he will allow President Trump to return. (I personally am not interested in his views. I think that I already know what they are.)

3. I personally have never visited Twitter and have no interest in doing so.

4. I understand, however, he is setting up a committee (AKA moderators) to decide what is acceptable and not acceptable.

5. Sadly, I believe that there have to be limits, for some people have no sense of discretion.

6. I heard that some big advertisers have already pulled out, lest they offend their customer base.

7. Cliche though it be, we shall see what we shall see.
 
Here is all you need to know about Musk owning twitter... Now, pretend you buy advertising on twitter, would this cause you any concern?

 
Is Elon Musk's purchase of Twitter bringing some conservative balance to social media, like Fox on cable, in a sea of liberal media influences, or is it more rightwing nuttery that propagates disinformation?

My answer to your poll, since you didn't provide this option, is "Neither".

I guess you and other don't understand...Twitter allowing everyone (that includes Musk, himself) to speak their mind is NOT the same thing as taking a side.
 
I wrote about it, so nothing of the alternatives

Okay, I have read up on the issue and now understand that Elon Musk wants to create a plattform equal to the chinese Wechat.

Background:
Elon Musk's plans for Twitter seem to carry links back to the entrepreneur's very first corporate success. In 1999, he co-founded X.com, a financial services provider. The company later changed its name to Paypal and was sold to Ebay for a multi-billion dollar sum. In 2017, Musk bought back the domain name "x.com" from Paypal for an undisclosed sum. Shortly afterwards, he himself wrote on Twitter that at the time he had no plans for the domain, but that it had great sentimental value. Anyone who visits the domain name today is greeted by just one letter - an "x" against a white background. The acquisition of Twitter is an accelerator for the creation of X, the everything app," Musk wrote on Twitter as recently as early October, adding that it was about the "original vision for X.com." Exactly what Musk means by an "everything app" is not clear from his often rather cryptic Twitter posts.

However, the role model seems to be the Chinese app Wechat, which like "X" can also be described as "an app for everything". In addition to communication, the app also offers its users everything from booking doctor's appointments, ordering food to payment services.

I hope he fails. It is not at all good that the concentration of power or control over our media is concentrated to a few white men in the United States. At the same time, it is easy to launch new apps and the chance that someone will create apps that are better than the ones Twitter can create is great. Here comes the problem with that big companies often kill smaler ones by buying them up at a premium. We'll see how it goes.

He will try to monopolize the online market, which is much more damaging for the free market and even for democracy than trying to dominate the social market.

And by the way, you need to stop calling the news sites "liberal media influences". It is to turn the facts into fiction to do that. There are proffesional news, that apply a set of rules to make their news reporting neutral (doesn't mean that their editorial sites are neutral, they shouldn't be...) , those are the ones you call liberal and then their are the ones that doesn't care about fact or professional integrity, like Fox. There are some very conservative newsoutlet that apply the integrity and professional rules for reporting. (I can give you swedish examples if you like) It is just the US ones that has gone bananas....
 
Last edited:
My answer to your poll, since you didn't provide this option, is "Neither".

I guess you and other don't understand...Twitter allowing everyone (that includes Musk, himself) to speak their mind is NOT the same thing as taking a side.
You're only right when you're left?
 
The guy is a nutbag who is already promoting fake news websites in his tweets.
 
Face it, none of this would have happened but for the LEFT. They want to censor everything that does not fit their liking and they want to re-write history, tear down statues, rename schools, holidays etc , devoid the country of crosses and Christianity, and promote nothing but Transgender, drag queen, etc., and climate change. They pushed "wokism" and "racism"to the point of NO ONE is listening any more. So here we have a rich man who can buy this Twitter and actually fight back and of course the left hate him. Same reason they hate Trump, because he fights back!!
They are nothing but big crybabies!!
 
Face it, none of this would have happened but for the LEFT. They want to censor everything that does not fit their liking and they want to re-write history, tear down statues, rename schools, holidays etc , devoid the country of crosses and Christianity, and promote nothing but Transgender, drag queen, etc., and climate change. They pushed "wokism" and "racism"to the point of NO ONE is listening any more. So here we have a rich man who can buy this Twitter and actually fight back and of course the left hate him. Same reason they hate Trump, because he fights back!!
They are nothing but big crybabies!!

Awww... Did the mean ole left hurt your feelings?
 
I wrote about it, so nothing of the alternatives



He will try to monopolize the online market, which is much more damaging for the free market and even for democracy than trying to dominate the social market.

And by the way, you need to stop calling the news sites "liberal media influences". It is to turn the facts into fiction to do that. There are proffesional news, that apply a set of rules to make their news reporting neutral (doesn't mean that their editorial sites are neutral, they shouldn't be...) , those are the ones you call liberal and then their are the ones that doesn't care about fact or professional integrity, like Fox. There are some very conservative newsoutlet that apply the integrity and professional rules for reporting. (I can give you swedish examples if you like) It is just the US ones that has gone bananas....
Any news organization that says "baseless claims of election fraud" is NOT being "neutral". If they were neutral, they would only say "claims of election fraud" and not add their own preferred adjective in front of it.
 
Is Elon Musk's purchase of Twitter bringing some conservative balance to social media, like Fox on cable, in a sea of liberal media influences, or is it more rightwing nuttery that propagates disinformation?

Conservative balance is a whitewash of "whitelash".






 
Conservative balance is a whitewash of "whitelash".







Race war? Is it black skin that whites don't like or black culture?
 
Is Elon Musk's purchase of Twitter bringing some conservative balance to social media, like Fox on cable, in a sea of liberal media influences, or is it more rightwing nuttery that propagates disinformation?

You left out "throwing a tantrum" which is the real reason for the purchase.
 
Musk was a left darling because of his EV company. Now it seems he is enemy #2.
(Trump is still #1)

Free speech is scary to some. Because you support free expression does not mean you support the speech being expressed.
Free speech is necessary for a healthy society. The current cancel culture opposes different ideas. They want you shut down. Silenced!!

Take some time and read some of the Supreme Court cases on free speech.
Censorship is a very dangerous thing!
 
I think he believes it will give his companies some leverage with politicians thru public influence.

How do you think that is going to work out?

 
Musk was a left darling because of his EV company. Now it seems he is enemy #2.
(Trump is still #1)

Free speech is scary to some. Because you support free expression does not mean you support the speech being expressed.
Free speech is necessary for a healthy society. The current cancel culture opposes different ideas. They want you shut down. Silenced!!


Free speech like this?




Take some time and read some of the Supreme Court cases on free speech.
Censorship is a very dangerous thing!

I have read a few, which ones do you think apply to social media companies?
 
How do you think that is going to work out?


Time will tell how much influence he has by any political clout he gathers if any. It could backfire if he becomes too conspiratorial.
 
Voted Don't Care.

But Musk & Twitter sounds like some odd personal care hair balm or such?

:ROFLMAO:
 
I think the idiot bullied himself into making a catastrophic financial decision. Twitter started eking out some profits, after years of loses, when they became more heavily moderated.

GM doesn’t want their advertisements sandwiched between N-bombs and Nazis.
 
Race war? Is it black skin that whites don't like or black culture?
Whose culture is doing more damage to whom? I've repeated my points all over this forum until I'm blue in the face.

The biggest tell that there is no interest in relieving tensions are the pattern of nominations to the 188 seats combined of the two highest federal courts, the average age of the judges nominated to those seats, the disparity of per capita police shootings of blacks compared to whites,
and of course, this,

Plenty of money for freakishly high per capita incarceration in the same states refusing to expand medicaid, and many parolees lose their right to vote.

12 states still refuse to expand Medicaid. Why that's a problem for all of us​

im-398467


World Incarceration Rates If Every U.S. State Were A Country

Louisiana 1,094
Mississippi 1,031
Oklahoma 993
Georgia (State) 968
Arkansas 942
Alabama 938
Kentucky 930
Arizona 868
Texas 840
Florida 795
Massachusetts 275



Massachusetts has 1/4 the per capita incarceration rate of Louisiana

Shootings and homicides are down in Boston this year ...

https://www.bostonglobe.com › 2021/12/07 › metro › sho...
Dec 7, 2021 — Total shooting incidents also were down, from 224 last year to 163 this year. Overall, what police refer to as Part 1 crime, which includes ...

2. Massachusetts
> Median household income:
$85,843
> Adults with at least a bachelor’s degree: 45.0% (the highest)
> Poverty rate: 9.4% (8th lowest)
> Median home value: $418,600 (3rd highest)
> Population: 6,892,503

Oklahoma - The Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence

https://efsgv.org › State Specific Info
More than 700 Oklahomans died by gun violence in 2019, an average of two people every day. Suicides were 64% of the gun deaths and homicides were 33%.

43. Oklahoma
> income:
$54,449
> at least a bachelor’s degree: 26.2% (7th lowest)
> Poverty (8th highest)
> home value: $147,000 (4th lowest)
> Pop.: 3,956,971





Shall I go on?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom