CaughtInThe
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2017
- Messages
- 149,911
- Reaction score
- 173,022
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Now, this is coming from fox 'news' and we all know what kind of massive liars they are. So...
Now, this is coming from fox 'news' and we all know what kind of massive liars they are. So...
Yes, depending on who you mean it's acceptable to. Can you imagine if trump had been re-elected so Biden hadn't cleaned house?I wonder if lying to protect Trump is acceptable secret service behavior?
To republicans it's not only acceptable, it's a requirement.I wonder if lying to protect Trump is acceptable secret service behavior?
I'm still waiting for retired Secret Service Assistant Director Tony Ornato to officially debunk Cassidy Hutchinson's 1/6 testimony about him. Tick tock.
Who could forget the crazy sea lioning about how Ornato was going to refute Hutchinson's testimony about what Ornato said about Trump's behavior on 1/6?Me too. Didn't the citizens of Trump Fan Nation repeatedly assure of that was going to happen any day now...?
Who could forget the crazy sea lioning about how Ornato was going to refute Hutchinson's testimony about what Ornato said about Trump's behavior on 1/6?
she was perfect ............Who could forget the crazy sea lioning about how Ornato was going to refute Hutchinson's testimony about what Ornato said about Trump's behavior on 1/6?
I wonder if lying to protect Trump is acceptable secret service behavior?
They will not lie under oath. A couple may have to take the 5th thoughI doubt they will lie. Secret service guys are pretty straight arrow.. at least the guys I've known.
ROFLMAO. Hutichison made a third party claim, which the so-called second party denied ever occurred and you are silly enough to think the burden of proof is on Ornato?I'm still waiting for retired Secret Service Assistant Director Tony Ornato to officially debunk Cassidy Hutchinson's 1/6 testimony about him. Tick tock.
They will not lie under oath. A couple may have to take the 5th though![]()
ROFLMAO. Hutichison made a third party claim, which the so-called second party denied ever occurred and you are silly enough to think the burden of proof is on Ornato?
And here we go ...ROFLMAO. Hutichison made a third party claim, which the so-called second party denied ever occurred and you are silly enough to think the burden of proof is on Ornato?
He is one who I think may plead the 5th.Ornato will testify under oath. He won't throw it all away for Trump.
Unless the "incentive" or kompromat carries more weight than jail time. Don't forget Weisselberg.Ornato will testify under oath. He won't throw it all away for Trump.
Just like "Wait for the Durham Report".I can't forget it. Those people posted it over and over and over and over and over.
Hutchison claimed her ridiculous version of events was told to her by Tony Ornato. Ornato claims he told her no such thing. Burden of proof is on Hutchison. No need for Ornato to debunk anything.And here we go ...
This isn't about me. My comments are referring to the dozens of posts in DP that called Hutchinson a liar and promised that Ornato would debunk her testimony.
Just like "Wait for the Durham Report".![]()
Hutchison claimed her ridiculous version of events was told to her by Tony Ornato. Ornato claims he told her no such thing. Burden of proof is on Hutchison. No need for Ornato to debunk anything.
ROFLMAO. Hutichison made a third party claim, which the so-called second party denied ever occurred and you are silly enough to think the burden of proof is on Ornato?
Tell that to your conservative comrades. I honestly dgaf about what Ornato has to say about it. Company he keeps and all that.Hutchison claimed her ridiculous version of events was told to her by Tony Ornato. Ornato claims he told her no such thing. Burden of proof is on Hutchison. No need for Ornato to debunk anything.