- Joined
- Dec 27, 2017
- Messages
- 22,825
- Reaction score
- 25,556
- Location
- Middle of it all
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
federal judge signaled Friday that she'll likely allow a group of Georgia voters to move forward with their constitutional challenge against GOP Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, which claims she can't run for reelection because she aided the January 6 insurrectionists.
Federal Judge Amy Totenberg of the Northern District of Georgia said during a lengthy hearing that she has "significant questions and concerns" about a recent ruling in a similar case, which blocked the same challenge against Rep. Madison Cawthorn, a North Carolina Republican.
Oh yeah.This should be good for a few barrels of froth.
Nobody cares about January 6, or this pathetic strategy to distract from the disaster in the WH. lol
Nobody cares about January 6, or this pathetic strategy to distract from the disaster in the WH. lol
Dumbass lie.Nobody cares about January 6
Nobody cares about January 6, or this pathetic strategy to distract from the disaster in the WH. LOL
Don't you have to prove a crime first, then convict the accused before there is a punishment handed out.
Violations of the constitution are a crime.Don't you have to prove a crime first, then convict the accused before there is a punishment handed out.
The judge in the MTG ruling mentioned that there were "many problems" with the cawthorn ruling.this ruling isn't going to help:
Federal judge blocks NC elections board from determining Cawthorn's eligibility to run
On Friday, a federal judge effectively blocked a challenge to North Carolina Congressman Madison Cawthorn’s candidacy. The North Carolina State Board of Elections is now enjoined from deciding whether Cawthorn’s alleged role in the January 6 insurrection makes him ineligible to run.www.whqr.org
No you just wish nobody cared…Nobody cares about January 6, or this pathetic strategy to distract from the disaster in the WH. lol
Great post! ThanksNobody cares about January 6, or this pathetic strategy to distract from the disaster in the WH. lol
Nobody cares about January 6, or this pathetic strategy to distract from the disaster in the WH. lol
You may not realize this but you don't speak for everyone, it matters to many of us and we'll use it against any candidate that played any role in or supporting what happened 1/6/21. Sorry.Nobody cares about January 6, or this pathetic strategy to distract from the disaster in the WH. lol
update:The judge in the MTG ruling mentioned that there were "many problems" with the cawthorn ruling.
The lawmaker [snot wheels] has previously won an injunction against the challenge to his reelection. The Fourth Circuit declined to stay that decision but granted an expedited appeal.
Oral arguments in the case are scheduled for May 3. ... U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit will hear arguments against an injunction that prevented Cawthorn from being removed from the ballot.
Republicans are nothing but a traitorous, racist, bigoted clown show. **** all of them. Seriously.
View attachment 67384912You know everyone cares about January 6, 2021. Stop lying.
See post 19.Dumbass lie.
We'll see in November. Keep pushing the narrative though. Stick to it. You don't want Trump to run? Be careful what you wish for.You may not realize this but you don't speak for everyone, it matters to many of us and we'll use it against any candidate that played any role in or supporting what happened 1/6/21. Sorry.
See post #8.See post 19.
Tell that to all the republican seditionists getting thrown in prison.Nobody cares about January 6, or this pathetic strategy to distract from the disaster in the WH. lol
this ruling isn't going to help:
Federal judge blocks NC elections board from determining Cawthorn's eligibility to run
On Friday, a federal judge effectively blocked a challenge to North Carolina Congressman Madison Cawthorn’s candidacy. The North Carolina State Board of Elections is now enjoined from deciding whether Cawthorn’s alleged role in the January 6 insurrection makes him ineligible to run.www.whqr.org
Violating the constitution is not necessarily a crime. It's a civil suit. If they can convince a jury she violated the said constitution, then she could be tossed. I doubt it would happen, but wouldn't that teach some of these loud mouth Putin lovers a lesson or two.Don't you have to prove a crime first, then convict the accused before there is a punishment handed out.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?