The MSM is going nuts for the fact pepper spray was used on the criminal invaders at the border. How soon they have forgotten the Obama admin did the same things many times. What is the difference now libs?
The MSM is going nuts for the fact pepper spray was used on the criminal invaders at the border. How soon they have forgotten the Obama admin did the same things many times. What is the difference now libs?
The MSM is going nuts for the fact pepper spray was used on the criminal invaders at the border. How soon they have forgotten the Obama admin did the same things many times. What is the difference now libs?
asylum seekers are not Criminals...Seeking Asylum is not a criminal offense! As Always you are badly confused...Read a book or two!
Diving Mullah
I'll believe it when you document it, credibly. No RWNJ sites.
As soon as they cross the border illegally, they are.
As soon as they cross the border illegally, they are.
Crossing the border at a place other than a designated port of entry, however, IS illegal. And that's what they were doing when the CS was deployed. Further, you are not a legitimate asylum seeker if you pass through another country that can offer it to you. Mexico offered them asylum. They kept going. They are not legitimate asylum seekers.asylum seekers are not Criminals...Seeking Asylum is not a criminal offense! As Always you are badly confused...Read a book or two!
Diving Mullah
But that's not all they were doing, is it? They were crossing the border at a place other than a designated port of entry. This is a criminal act.There is absolutely nothing illegal about standing at the United States border, and there is absolutely nothing illegal about seeking asylum. You may need to read up on laws before tossing around the word "criminal" incorrectly, as you just did.
They are supposed to apply at the first safe country they enter. Mexico offered them asylum. And even if they so apply for asylum, they have to do it not at just any point on the border, but at a designated port of entry. Breaking through a fence and barging into the country is not seeking asylum; it is instead unlawful entry and a crime.Asylum seekers are supposed to apply at the border, so no.
They are supposed to apply at the first safe country they enter. Mexico offered them asylum. And even if they so apply for asylum, they have to do it not at just any point on the border, but at a designated port of entry. Breaking through a fence and barging into the country is not seeking asylum; it is instead unlawful entry and a crime.
Asylum seekers are supposed to apply at the border, so no.
Someone who crosses elsewhere is a misdemeanor illegal entrant, "criminal" in pretty much the lowest sense federally speaking.
You can spin it any way you want.
When they cross illegally, they are a criminal.
They are not as asylum seekers if they cross the border with out proper papers. If they do there are indeed criminal invaders. If they are in Mexico there are several Consulates and the Embassy they can apply to get the proper papers. What is wrong with doing it the lawful way??????????
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?