Um they have regular state sponsored "death to America" rallies in Iran.
You don't have as much time and insulation as you think. The next generation Shahab missile will include Europe in its target universe. This is precisely why the normally passive European Union is almost frantic it its carrot/stick approach to Iran's nuclear ambitions.Why should we be worried?
You don't have as much time and insulation as you think. The next generation Shahab missile will include Europe in its target universe. This is precisely why the normally passive European Union is almost frantic it its carrot/stick approach to Iran's nuclear ambitions.
Different titles, different people, same general procedure.
Nobody in the U.S. gets within actual winning distance of the White House that hasn't been properly groomed and vetted by one of the Establishment's 'parties'.
That definitely includes Obama as well, despite all the smoke and hubris put out by the likes of Daily Kos and the National Review.
The last big scare for the Establishment was George McGovern, due to a weakness in the Democratic Party's procedures, but that flaw was corrected in 1984, by implementing the 'Super Delegate' scheme, which once and for all made any sort of populist threat from that wing utterly impossible.
It hasn't even got Nukes yet, it'll take years to get to that stage
But would they use it? I doubt it seeing it is not the west that seemed to have inspired their new found love of Nukes
So? Such rallies have always been around
There are death to 'UK' rallies all over ME and has been there for some time.
Hand on heart, do you really think Iran would attack a country with the most Nukes in the world AND has had a history of using it?
I don't think so.
Iran is all talk no action. It hasn't started a war for decades.
You'd be surprised at the threat a nuclear Iran poses for Europe.It hasn't even got Nukes yet, it'll take years to get to that stage
But would they use it? I doubt it seeing it is not the west that seemed to have inspired their new found love of Nukes
A high turnout is usually not good for the incumbent. So WTF?Now there's a rigged election. Record disapproval ratings. High youth voter turnout.
And Disco Stu wins?
R-I-G-G-E-D.
The 67% for Disco Stu is clearly rigged. If the Mullahs were not scared, they wouldn't have shutdown text messaging, facebook, Myspace and other non-controlled news outlets.
As many as it takes to convince people that we have a fairly good system in need of reform and that the Iranians are not ready for self government..How many Iranian election threads do we need?
Leftists ought to rejoice that Iminajihad was re-elected. They still have a anti-Semite ally running Iran.
Israel tacticians want Mahmoud Ahmadinejad win
A SENIOR Israeli official said yesterday the consensus among his colleagues in Jerusalem was that a victory for the hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in the Iranian elections would be in Israel's best interest.
Israel tacticians want Mahmoud Ahmadinejad win | The Australian"There is no one who has served Israel's information program better than him," wrote columnist Ben Caspi in the daily Ma'ariv yesterday.
Israeli security officials note that decisions regarding major issues such as the nuclear program are made in Iran not by the president, regardless of who he is, but by Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and a small group of senior clerics.
"From an operational point of view, it doesn't make a difference who wins," said one official. And a Foreign Ministry official who deals with the Iranian issue said: "From an informational point of view, he (Ahmadinejad) is the best thing that's happened to us."
What the hell are you talking about?As many as it takes to convince people that we have a fairly good system in need of reform and that the Iranians are not ready for self government..
Don't get me wrong, Israel doesn't want Iran to have nukes, but it is you who should worry and do something about it.
The Iranians are not that dumb.UK is not in as much danger as Israel, you are the num 1. target not us.
Israel fears Iran getting Nukes and its consequences of an Arms race on other Arab countries.
So technically it is your country which should worry more than Europe.
Sure, in years time they'd have the ability to take us out assuming we don't release our nukes on them but we all know which country would get it first.
It is in Israel's interest more than the worlds imo this whole fiasco with Iran and therefore we should allow Israel to deal with it and not waste our time, effort, money or soldiers to defend anyone but ourselves.
I remind you that the UK is not safe from terrorism(London bombing).
Just imagine how would it be if those terrorists have nukes.
You're saying this as if Israel started those wars.And it works as well, who's fault is that? Isreal seems to hand them ways to allow Iran to gain its popularity. Hezbollah war, Gaza .... It was Iran's side that came out strong and Israel's actions weakened the Sunni side
Call it however you wish, it was terrorism and it was targeting the UK. THE HORROR.That was a homegrown threat and occured because of UK backing US in Iraq.
Terrorists are many kinds of people, not only "young naive Muslims from Northern London"Yeah ... because young niave Muslims from North London will have Nukes to use on London.
And it works as well, who's fault is that? Isreal seems to hand them ways to allow Iran to gain its popularity. Hezbollah war, Gaza .... It was Iran's side that came out strong and Israel's actions weakened the Sunni side
That was a homegrown threat and occured because of UK backing US in Iraq.
Yeah ... because young niave Muslims from North London will have Nukes to use on London.
You're saying this as if Israel started those wars.
If anything it was Hamas and Hizbullah who gave support to Iran, and not the Israeli reaction.
Call it however you wish, it was terrorism and it was targeting the UK. THE HORROR.
Terrorists are many kinds of people, not only "young naive Muslims from Northern London"
And yes, they could easily get their hands on a nuke in case a nuclear arming race would take place in the ME.
So what was Israel supposed to do ignore the hundreds of rockets flying into Israel civilian sectors? If there was no mainstream support within Lebanon for Hezbollah prior to the 2nd Lebanese/Israeli war then that war would never have occurred because Hezbollah would have been destroyed by the Lebanese people themselves.
That was not a homegrown event, those people never considered themselves as citizens of the U.K. but rather citizens of the Ummah fighting for the global Jihad against the infidel. That event occurred not because of UK backing of the US in Iraq that occurred because those people were members of the global Jihad who heralded OBL's call to kill westerners. The Jihadists kill the infidel for one reason because they believe it is ordained by god to do so. If there was no war in Iraq, no Israel, and no troops in Saudi Arabia the Jihad of the Islamic Imperialist expansionists would still exist just as it has existed non-stop for the last fifteen hundred years.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?